Theorem nfopd 3760

Description: Deduction version of bound-variable hypothesis builder nfop 3759. This shows how the deduction version of a not-free theorem such as nfop 3759 can be created from the corresponding not-free inference theorem. (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2008.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nfopd.2	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)
nfopd.3	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfopd	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)

Proof of Theorem nfopd

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfaba1 2305	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}
2		nfaba1 2305	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵}
3	1, 2	nfop 3759	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥⟨{𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}, {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵}⟩
4		nfopd.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)
5		nfopd.3	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)
6		nfnfc1 2302	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
7		nfnfc1 2302	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
8	6, 7	nfan 1545	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)
9		abidnf 2880	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴)
10	9	adantr 274	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) → {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴)
11		abidnf 2880	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 → {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵} = 𝐵)
12	11	adantl 275	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) → {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵} = 𝐵)
13	10, 12	opeq12d 3751	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) → ⟨{𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}, {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵}⟩ = ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)
14	8, 13	nfceqdf 2298	. . 3 ⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) → (Ⅎ𝑥⟨{𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}, {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵}⟩ ↔ Ⅎ𝑥⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩))
15	4, 5, 14	syl2anc 409	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Ⅎ𝑥⟨{𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}, {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵}⟩ ↔ Ⅎ𝑥⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩))
16	3, 15	mpbii 147	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103   ↔ wb 104  ∀wal 1333   = wceq 1335   ∈ wcel 2128  {cab 2143  Ⅎwnfc 2286  ⟨cop 3564

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 699  ax-5 1427  ax-7 1428  ax-gen 1429  ax-ie1 1473  ax-ie2 1474  ax-8 1484  ax-10 1485  ax-11 1486  ax-i12 1487  ax-bndl 1489  ax-4 1490  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2139

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 965  df-tru 1338  df-nf 1441  df-sb 1743  df-clab 2144  df-cleq 2150  df-clel 2153  df-nfc 2288  df-v 2714  df-un 3106  df-sn 3567  df-pr 3568  df-op 3570

This theorem is referenced by:  nfbrd  4011  nfovd  5852