Theorem nfopd 3775

Description: Deduction version of bound-variable hypothesis builder nfop 3774. This shows how the deduction version of a not-free theorem such as nfop 3774 can be created from the corresponding not-free inference theorem. (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2008.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nfopd.2	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)
nfopd.3	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfopd	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)

Proof of Theorem nfopd

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfaba1 2314	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}
2		nfaba1 2314	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵}
3	1, 2	nfop 3774	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥⟨{𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}, {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵}⟩
4		nfopd.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)
5		nfopd.3	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)
6		nfnfc1 2311	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
7		nfnfc1 2311	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
8	6, 7	nfan 1553	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)
9		abidnf 2894	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴)
10	9	adantr 274	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) → {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴)
11		abidnf 2894	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 → {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵} = 𝐵)
12	11	adantl 275	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) → {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵} = 𝐵)
13	10, 12	opeq12d 3766	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) → ⟨{𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}, {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵}⟩ = ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)
14	8, 13	nfceqdf 2307	. . 3 ⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) → (Ⅎ𝑥⟨{𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}, {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵}⟩ ↔ Ⅎ𝑥⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩))
15	4, 5, 14	syl2anc 409	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Ⅎ𝑥⟨{𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}, {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵}⟩ ↔ Ⅎ𝑥⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩))
16	3, 15	mpbii 147	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103   ↔ wb 104  ∀wal 1341   = wceq 1343   ∈ wcel 2136  {cab 2151  Ⅎwnfc 2295  ⟨cop 3579

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 699  ax-5 1435  ax-7 1436  ax-gen 1437  ax-ie1 1481  ax-ie2 1482  ax-8 1492  ax-10 1493  ax-11 1494  ax-i12 1495  ax-bndl 1497  ax-4 1498  ax-17 1514  ax-i9 1518  ax-ial 1522  ax-i5r 1523  ax-ext 2147

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 970  df-tru 1346  df-nf 1449  df-sb 1751  df-clab 2152  df-cleq 2158  df-clel 2161  df-nfc 2297  df-v 2728  df-un 3120  df-sn 3582  df-pr 3583  df-op 3585

This theorem is referenced by:  nfbrd  4027  nfovd  5871