P. 38 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 3701-3800   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	nfpw 3701	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for power class. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   =>    |- F/_ x ~P A
Theorem	pwidg 3702	Membership of the original in a power set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.)
|- ( A e. V -> A e. ~P A )
Theorem	pwid 3703	A set is a member of its power class. Theorem 87 of [Suppes] p. 47. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- A e. ~P A
Theorem	pwss 3704*	Subclass relationship for power class. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2009.)
|- ( ~P A C_ B <-> A. x ( x C_ A -> x e. B ) )
2.1.17  Unordered and ordered pairs
Syntax	csn 3705	Extend class notation to include singleton.
class { A }
Syntax	cpr 3706	Extend class notation to include unordered pair.
class { A , B }
Syntax	ctp 3707	Extend class notation to include unordered triplet.
class { A , B , C }
Syntax	cop 3708	Extend class notation to include ordered pair.
class <. A , B >.
Syntax	cotp 3709	Extend class notation to include ordered triple.
class <. A , B , C >.
Theorem	snjust 3710*	Soundness justification theorem for df-sn 3711. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.)
|- { x | x = A } = { y | y = A }
Definition	df-sn 3711*	Define the singleton of a class. Definition 7.1 of [Quine] p. 48. For convenience, it is well-defined for proper classes, i.e., those that are not elements of _V, although it is not very meaningful in this case. For an alternate definition see dfsn2 3719. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- { A } = { x | x = A }
Definition	df-pr 3712	Define unordered pair of classes. Definition 7.1 of [Quine] p. 48. They are unordered, so { A , B } = { B , A } as proven by prcom 3783. For a more traditional definition, but requiring a dummy variable, see dfpr2 3724. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- { A , B } = ( { A } u. { B } )
Definition	df-tp 3713	Define unordered triple of classes. Definition of [Enderton] p. 19. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1994.)
|- { A , B , C } = ( { A , B } u. { C } )
Definition	df-op 3714*	Definition of an ordered pair, equivalent to Kuratowski's definition { { A } , { A , B } } when the arguments are sets. Since the behavior of Kuratowski definition is not very useful for proper classes, we define it to be empty in this case (see opprc1 3921 and opprc2 3922). For Kuratowski's actual definition when the arguments are sets, see dfop 3898. Definition 9.1 of [Quine] p. 58 defines an ordered pair unconditionally as <. A , B >. = { { A } , { A , B } }, which has different behavior from our df-op 3714 when the arguments are proper classes. Ordinarily this difference is not important, since neither definition is meaningful in that case. Our df-op 3714 was chosen because it often makes proofs shorter by eliminating unnecessary sethood hypotheses. There are other ways to define ordered pairs. The basic requirement is that two ordered pairs are equal iff their respective members are equal. In 1914 Norbert Wiener gave the first successful definition <. A , B >.2 = { { { A } , (/) } , { { B } } }. This was simplified by Kazimierz Kuratowski in 1921 to our present definition. An even simpler definition is <. A , B >.3 = { A , { A , B } }, but it requires the Axiom of Regularity for its justification and is not commonly used. Finally, an ordered pair of real numbers can be represented by a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- <. A , B >. = { x | ( A e. _V /\ B e. _V /\ x e. { { A } , { A , B } } ) }
Definition	df-ot 3715	Define ordered triple of classes. Definition of ordered triple in [Stoll] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.)
|- <. A , B , C >. = <. <. A , B >. , C >.
Theorem	sneq 3716	Equality theorem for singletons. Part of Exercise 4 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( A = B -> { A } = { B } )
Theorem	sneqi 3717	Equality inference for singletons. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jan-2004.)
|- A = B   =>    |- { A } = { B }
Theorem	sneqd 3718	Equality deduction for singletons. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jan-2004.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> { A } = { B } )
Theorem	dfsn2 3719	Alternate definition of singleton. Definition 5.1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-1994.)
|- { A } = { A , A }
Theorem	elsng 3720	There is exactly one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15 (generalized). (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A e. { B } <-> A = B ) )
Theorem	elsn 3721	There is exactly one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-1995.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( A e. { B } <-> A = B )
Theorem	velsn 3722	There is only one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.)
|- ( x e. { A } <-> x = A )
Theorem	elsni 3723	There is only one element in a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-1994.)
|- ( A e. { B } -> A = B )
Theorem	dfpr2 3724*	Alternate definition of unordered pair. Definition 5.1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-1994.)
|- { A , B } = { x | ( x = A \/ x = B ) }
Theorem	elprg 3725	A member of an unordered pair of classes is one or the other of them. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15, generalized. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-1995.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A e. { B , C } <-> ( A = B \/ A = C ) ) )
Theorem	elpr 3726	A member of an unordered pair of classes is one or the other of them. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-1995.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( A e. { B , C } <-> ( A = B \/ A = C ) )
Theorem	elpr2 3727	A member of an unordered pair of classes is one or the other of them. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.)
|- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   =>    |- ( A e. { B , C } <-> ( A = B \/ A = C ) )
Theorem	elpri 3728	If a class is an element of a pair, then it is one of the two paired elements. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Apr-2011.)
|- ( A e. { B , C } -> ( A = B \/ A = C ) )
Theorem	nelpri 3729	If an element doesn't match the items in an unordered pair, it is not in the unordered pair. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 10-May-2015.)
|- A =/= B   &    |- A =/= C   =>    |- -. A e. { B , C }
Theorem	prneli 3730	If an element doesn't match the items in an unordered pair, it is not in the unordered pair, using e/. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 10-May-2015.)
|- A =/= B   &    |- A =/= C   =>    |- A e/ { B , C }
Theorem	nelprd 3731	If an element doesn't match the items in an unordered pair, it is not in the unordered pair, deduction version. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Jan-2018.)
|- ( ph -> A =/= B )   &    |- ( ph -> A =/= C )   =>    |- ( ph -> -. A e. { B , C } )
Theorem	eldifpr 3732	Membership in a set with two elements removed. Similar to eldifsn 3836 and eldiftp 3751. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2017.)
|- ( A e. ( B \ { C , D } ) <-> ( A e. B /\ A =/= C /\ A =/= D ) )
Theorem	rexdifpr 3733	Restricted existential quantification over a set with two elements removed. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 7-Feb-2018.)
|- ( E. x e. ( A \ { B , C } ) ph <-> E. x e. A ( x =/= B /\ x =/= C /\ ph ) )
Theorem	snidg 3734	A set is a member of its singleton. Part of Theorem 7.6 of [Quine] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-2003.)
|- ( A e. V -> A e. { A } )
Theorem	snidb 3735	A class is a set iff it is a member of its singleton. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.)
|- ( A e. _V <-> A e. { A } )
Theorem	snid 3736	A set is a member of its singleton. Part of Theorem 7.6 of [Quine] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-1993.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- A e. { A }
Theorem	vsnid 3737	A setvar variable is a member of its singleton (common case). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
|- x e. { x }
Theorem	elsn2g 3738	There is only one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. This variation requires only that B, rather than A, be a set. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-2003.)
|- ( B e. V -> ( A e. { B } <-> A = B ) )
Theorem	elsn2 3739	There is only one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. This variation requires only that B, rather than A, be a set. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-1994.)
|- B e. _V   =>    |- ( A e. { B } <-> A = B )
Theorem	nelsn 3740	If a class is not equal to the class in a singleton, then it is not in the singleton. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 17-Aug-2020.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 4-May-2021.)
|- ( A =/= B -> -. A e. { B } )
Theorem	mosn 3741*	A singleton has at most one element. This works whether A is a proper class or not, and in that sense can be seen as encompassing both snmg 3826 and snprc 3770. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Aug-2018.)
|- E* x x e. { A }
Theorem	ralsnsg 3742*	Substitution expressed in terms of quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A. x e. { A } ph <-> [. A / x ]. ph ) )
Theorem	ralsns 3743*	Substitution expressed in terms of quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A. x e. { A } ph <-> [. A / x ]. ph ) )
Theorem	rexsns 3744*	Restricted existential quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) (Revised by NM, 22-Aug-2018.)
|- ( E. x e. { A } ph <-> [. A / x ]. ph )
Theorem	ralsng 3745*	Substitution expressed in terms of quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( A. x e. { A } ph <-> ps ) )
Theorem	rexsng 3746*	Restricted existential quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-2012.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( E. x e. { A } ph <-> ps ) )
Theorem	exsnrex 3747	There is a set being the element of a singleton if and only if there is an element of the singleton. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jan-2018.)
|- ( E. x M = { x } <-> E. x e. M M = { x } )
Theorem	ralsn 3748*	Convert a quantification over a singleton to a substitution. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2009.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x e. { A } ph <-> ps )
Theorem	rexsn 3749*	Restricted existential quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 5-Jan-2011.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E. x e. { A } ph <-> ps )
Theorem	eltpg 3750	Members of an unordered triple of classes. (Contributed by FL, 2-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 11-Feb-2015.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A e. { B , C , D } <-> ( A = B \/ A = C \/ A = D ) ) )
Theorem	eldiftp 3751	Membership in a set with three elements removed. Similar to eldifsn 3836 and eldifpr 3732. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 22-Jul-2017.)
|- ( A e. ( B \ { C , D , E } ) <-> ( A e. B /\ ( A =/= C /\ A =/= D /\ A =/= E ) ) )
Theorem	eltpi 3752	A member of an unordered triple of classes is one of them. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Feb-2015.)
|- ( A e. { B , C , D } -> ( A = B \/ A = C \/ A = D ) )
Theorem	eltp 3753	A member of an unordered triple of classes is one of them. Special case of Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 17. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Feb-2015.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( A e. { B , C , D } <-> ( A = B \/ A = C \/ A = D ) )
Theorem	dftp2 3754*	Alternate definition of unordered triple of classes. Special case of Definition 5.3 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-1994.)
|- { A , B , C } = { x | ( x = A \/ x = B \/ x = C ) }
Theorem	nfpr 3755	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-1995.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ x B   =>    |- F/_ x { A , B }
Theorem	ralprg 3756*	Convert a quantification over a pair to a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = B -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( A. x e. { A , B } ph <-> ( ps /\ ch ) ) )
Theorem	rexprg 3757*	Convert a quantification over a pair to a disjunction. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = B -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( E. x e. { A , B } ph <-> ( ps \/ ch ) ) )
Theorem	raltpg 3758*	Convert a quantification over a triple to a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = B -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = C -> ( ph <-> th ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ C e. X ) -> ( A. x e. { A , B , C } ph <-> ( ps /\ ch /\ th ) ) )
Theorem	rextpg 3759*	Convert a quantification over a triple to a disjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = B -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = C -> ( ph <-> th ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ C e. X ) -> ( E. x e. { A , B , C } ph <-> ( ps \/ ch \/ th ) ) )
Theorem	ralpr 3760*	Convert a quantification over a pair to a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = B -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( A. x e. { A , B } ph <-> ( ps /\ ch ) )
Theorem	rexpr 3761*	Convert an existential quantification over a pair to a disjunction. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = B -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( E. x e. { A , B } ph <-> ( ps \/ ch ) )
Theorem	raltp 3762*	Convert a quantification over a triple to a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = B -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = C -> ( ph <-> th ) )   =>    |- ( A. x e. { A , B , C } ph <-> ( ps /\ ch /\ th ) )
Theorem	rextp 3763*	Convert a quantification over a triple to a disjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = B -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = C -> ( ph <-> th ) )   =>    |- ( E. x e. { A , B , C } ph <-> ( ps \/ ch \/ th ) )
Theorem	sbcsng 3764*	Substitution expressed in terms of quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( [. A / x ]. ph <-> A. x e. { A } ph ) )
Theorem	nfsn 3765	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for singletons. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-1995.)
|- F/_ x A   =>    |- F/_ x { A }
Theorem	csbsng 3766	Distribute proper substitution through the singleton of a class. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.)
|- ( A e. V -> [_ A / x ]_ { B } = { [_ A / x ]_ B } )
Theorem	disjsn 3767	Intersection with the singleton of a non-member is disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 30-Sep-2014.)
|- ( ( A i^i { B } ) = (/) <-> -. B e. A )
Theorem	disjsn2 3768	Intersection of distinct singletons is disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 25-May-1998.)
|- ( A =/= B -> ( { A } i^i { B } ) = (/) )
Theorem	disjpr2 3769	The intersection of distinct unordered pairs is disjoint. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 11-Nov-2017.)
|- ( ( ( A =/= C /\ B =/= C ) /\ ( A =/= D /\ B =/= D ) ) -> ( { A , B } i^i { C , D } ) = (/) )
Theorem	snprc 3770	The singleton of a proper class (one that doesn't exist) is the empty set. Theorem 7.2 of [Quine] p. 48. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( -. A e. _V <-> { A } = (/) )
Theorem	r19.12sn 3771*	Special case of r19.12 2657 where its converse holds. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) (Revised by BJ, 20-Dec-2021.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( E. x e. { A } A. y e. B ph <-> A. y e. B E. x e. { A } ph ) )
Theorem	rabsn 3772*	Condition where a restricted class abstraction is a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-2006.)
|- ( B e. A -> { x e. A | x = B } = { B } )
Theorem	rabsnifsb 3773*	A restricted class abstraction restricted to a singleton is either the empty set or the singleton itself. (Contributed by AV, 21-Jul-2019.)
|- { x e. { A } | ph } = if ( [. A / x ]. ph , { A } , (/) )
Theorem	rabsnif 3774*	A restricted class abstraction restricted to a singleton is either the empty set or the singleton itself. (Contributed by AV, 12-Apr-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 21-Jul-2019.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- { x e. { A } | ph } = if ( ps , { A } , (/) )
Theorem	rabrsndc 3775*	A class abstraction over a decidable proposition restricted to a singleton is either the empty set or the singleton itself. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Aug-2018.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- DECID ph   =>    |- ( M = { x e. { A } | ph } -> ( M = (/) \/ M = { A } ) )
Theorem	euabsn2 3776*	Another way to express existential uniqueness of a wff: its class abstraction is a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2016.)
|- ( E! x ph <-> E. y { x | ph } = { y } )
Theorem	euabsn 3777	Another way to express existential uniqueness of a wff: its class abstraction is a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2004.)
|- ( E! x ph <-> E. x { x | ph } = { x } )
Theorem	reusn 3778*	A way to express restricted existential uniqueness of a wff: its restricted class abstraction is a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2016.)
|- ( E! x e. A ph <-> E. y { x e. A | ph } = { y } )
Theorem	absneu 3779	Restricted existential uniqueness determined by a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2006.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ { x | ph } = { A } ) -> E! x ph )
Theorem	rabsneu 3780	Restricted existential uniqueness determined by a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ { x e. B | ph } = { A } ) -> E! x e. B ph )
Theorem	eusn 3781*	Two ways to express " A is a singleton". (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-2010.)
|- ( E! x x e. A <-> E. x A = { x } )
Theorem	rabsnt 3782*	Truth implied by equality of a restricted class abstraction and a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
|- B e. _V   &    |- ( x = B -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( { x e. A | ph } = { B } -> ps )
Theorem	prcom 3783	Commutative law for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- { A , B } = { B , A }
Theorem	preq1 3784	Equality theorem for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 29-Mar-1998.)
|- ( A = B -> { A , C } = { B , C } )
Theorem	preq2 3785	Equality theorem for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( A = B -> { C , A } = { C , B } )
Theorem	preq12 3786	Equality theorem for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.)
|- ( ( A = C /\ B = D ) -> { A , B } = { C , D } )
Theorem	preq1i 3787	Equality inference for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.)
|- A = B   =>    |- { A , C } = { B , C }
Theorem	preq2i 3788	Equality inference for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.)
|- A = B   =>    |- { C , A } = { C , B }
Theorem	preq12i 3789	Equality inference for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.)
|- A = B   &    |- C = D   =>    |- { A , C } = { B , D }
Theorem	preq1d 3790	Equality deduction for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> { A , C } = { B , C } )
Theorem	preq2d 3791	Equality deduction for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> { C , A } = { C , B } )
Theorem	preq12d 3792	Equality deduction for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> C = D )   =>    |- ( ph -> { A , C } = { B , D } )
Theorem	tpeq1 3793	Equality theorem for unordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2011.)
|- ( A = B -> { A , C , D } = { B , C , D } )
Theorem	tpeq2 3794	Equality theorem for unordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2011.)
|- ( A = B -> { C , A , D } = { C , B , D } )
Theorem	tpeq3 3795	Equality theorem for unordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2011.)
|- ( A = B -> { C , D , A } = { C , D , B } )
Theorem	tpeq1d 3796	Equality theorem for unordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> { A , C , D } = { B , C , D } )
Theorem	tpeq2d 3797	Equality theorem for unordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> { C , A , D } = { C , B , D } )
Theorem	tpeq3d 3798	Equality theorem for unordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> { C , D , A } = { C , D , B } )
Theorem	tpeq123d 3799	Equality theorem for unordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> C = D )   &    |- ( ph -> E = F )   =>    |- ( ph -> { A , C , E } = { B , D , F } )
Theorem	tprot 3800	Rotation of the elements of an unordered triple. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Oct-2011.)
|- { A , B , C } = { B , C , A }