Theorem ssoprab2i 5967

Description: Inference of operation class abstraction subclass from implication. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
ssoprab2i.1	|- ( ph -> ps )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ssoprab2i	|- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } C_ { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ps }

Distinct variable groups:   x, z   y, z

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, y, z)   ps( x, y, z)

Proof of Theorem ssoprab2i

Dummy variable w is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ssoprab2i.1	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> ps )
2	1	anim2i 342	. . . 4 |- ( ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) -> ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ps ) )
3	2	2eximi 1601	. . 3 |- ( E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) -> E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ps ) )
4	3	ssopab2i 4279	. 2 |- { <. w , z >. | E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) } C_ { <. w , z >. | E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ps ) }
5		dfoprab2 5925	. 2 |- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } = { <. w , z >. | E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) }
6		dfoprab2 5925	. 2 |- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ps } = { <. w , z >. | E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ps ) }
7	4, 5, 6	3sstr4i 3198	1 |- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } C_ { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ps }

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   = wceq 1353   E.wex 1492   C_ wss 3131   <.cop 3597   {copab 4065   {coprab 5879

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 709  ax-5 1447  ax-7 1448  ax-gen 1449  ax-ie1 1493  ax-ie2 1494  ax-8 1504  ax-10 1505  ax-11 1506  ax-i12 1507  ax-bndl 1509  ax-4 1510  ax-17 1526  ax-i9 1530  ax-ial 1534  ax-i5r 1535  ax-14 2151  ax-ext 2159  ax-sep 4123  ax-pow 4176  ax-pr 4211

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 980  df-tru 1356  df-nf 1461  df-sb 1763  df-clab 2164  df-cleq 2170  df-clel 2173  df-nfc 2308  df-v 2741  df-un 3135  df-in 3137  df-ss 3144  df-pw 3579  df-sn 3600  df-pr 3601  df-op 3603  df-opab 4067  df-oprab 5882

This theorem is referenced by: (None)