Theorem ssoprab2i 6109

Description: Inference of operation class abstraction subclass from implication. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
ssoprab2i.1	|- ( ph -> ps )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ssoprab2i	|- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } C_ { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ps }

Distinct variable groups:   x, z   y, z

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, y, z)   ps( x, y, z)

Proof of Theorem ssoprab2i

Dummy variable w is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ssoprab2i.1	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> ps )
2	1	anim2i 342	. . . 4 |- ( ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) -> ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ps ) )
3	2	2eximi 1649	. . 3 |- ( E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) -> E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ps ) )
4	3	ssopab2i 4372	. 2 |- { <. w , z >. | E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) } C_ { <. w , z >. | E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ps ) }
5		dfoprab2 6067	. 2 |- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } = { <. w , z >. | E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) }
6		dfoprab2 6067	. 2 |- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ps } = { <. w , z >. | E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ps ) }
7	4, 5, 6	3sstr4i 3268	1 |- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } C_ { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ps }

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   = wceq 1397   E.wex 1540   C_ wss 3200   <.cop 3672   {copab 4149   {coprab 6018

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 716  ax-5 1495  ax-7 1496  ax-gen 1497  ax-ie1 1541  ax-ie2 1542  ax-8 1552  ax-10 1553  ax-11 1554  ax-i12 1555  ax-bndl 1557  ax-4 1558  ax-17 1574  ax-i9 1578  ax-ial 1582  ax-i5r 1583  ax-14 2205  ax-ext 2213  ax-sep 4207  ax-pow 4264  ax-pr 4299

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1006  df-tru 1400  df-nf 1509  df-sb 1811  df-clab 2218  df-cleq 2224  df-clel 2227  df-nfc 2363  df-v 2804  df-un 3204  df-in 3206  df-ss 3213  df-pw 3654  df-sn 3675  df-pr 3676  df-op 3678  df-opab 4151  df-oprab 6021

This theorem is referenced by:  mpomulf  8168