Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next > Nearby theorems Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  ssoprab2i GIF version

Theorem ssoprab2i 5860
 Description: Inference of operation class abstraction subclass from implication. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.)
Hypothesis
Ref Expression
ssoprab2i.1 (𝜑𝜓)
Assertion
Ref Expression
ssoprab2i {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓}
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑧   𝑦,𝑧
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem ssoprab2i
Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 ssoprab2i.1 . . . . 5 (𝜑𝜓)
21anim2i 339 . . . 4 ((𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓))
322eximi 1580 . . 3 (∃𝑥𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑥𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓))
43ssopab2i 4199 . 2 {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)}
5 dfoprab2 5818 . 2 {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
6 dfoprab2 5818 . 2 {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)}
74, 5, 63sstr4i 3138 1 {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓}
 Colors of variables: wff set class Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103   = wceq 1331  ∃wex 1468   ⊆ wss 3071  ⟨cop 3530  {copab 3988  {coprab 5775 This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 698  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-10 1483  ax-11 1484  ax-i12 1485  ax-bndl 1486  ax-4 1487  ax-14 1492  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2121  ax-sep 4046  ax-pow 4098  ax-pr 4131 This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 964  df-tru 1334  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736  df-clab 2126  df-cleq 2132  df-clel 2135  df-nfc 2270  df-v 2688  df-un 3075  df-in 3077  df-ss 3084  df-pw 3512  df-sn 3533  df-pr 3534  df-op 3536  df-opab 3990  df-oprab 5778 This theorem is referenced by: (None)
 Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator