Theorem bj-indsuc 16315

Description: A direct consequence of the definition of Ind. (Contributed by BJ, 30-Nov-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-indsuc	⊢ (Ind 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → suc 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))

Proof of Theorem bj-indsuc

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-bj-ind 16314	. . 3 ⊢ (Ind 𝐴 ↔ (∅ ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 suc 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
2	1	simprbi 275	. 2 ⊢ (Ind 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 suc 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
3		suceq 4493	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → suc 𝑥 = suc 𝐵)
4	3	eleq1d 2298	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (suc 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ suc 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
5	4	rspcv 2903	. 2 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 suc 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → suc 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
6	2, 5	syl5com 29	1 ⊢ (Ind 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → suc 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1395   ∈ wcel 2200  ∀wral 2508  ∅c0 3491  suc csuc 4456  Ind wind 16313

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 714  ax-5 1493  ax-7 1494  ax-gen 1495  ax-ie1 1539  ax-ie2 1540  ax-8 1550  ax-10 1551  ax-11 1552  ax-i12 1553  ax-bndl 1555  ax-4 1556  ax-17 1572  ax-i9 1576  ax-ial 1580  ax-i5r 1581  ax-ext 2211

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1398  df-nf 1507  df-sb 1809  df-clab 2216  df-cleq 2222  df-clel 2225  df-nfc 2361  df-ral 2513  df-v 2801  df-un 3201  df-sn 3672  df-suc 4462  df-bj-ind 16314

This theorem is referenced by:  bj-indint  16318  bj-peano2  16326  bj-inf2vnlem2  16358