Theorem bj-indsuc 16937

Description: A direct consequence of the definition of Ind. (Contributed by BJ, 30-Nov-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-indsuc	⊢ (Ind 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → suc 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))

Proof of Theorem bj-indsuc

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-bj-ind 16936	. . 3 ⊢ (Ind 𝐴 ↔ (∅ ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 suc 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
2	1	simprbi 275	. 2 ⊢ (Ind 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 suc 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
3		suceq 4545	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → suc 𝑥 = suc 𝐵)
4	3	eleq1d 2307	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (suc 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ suc 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
5	4	rspcv 2925	. 2 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 suc 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → suc 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
6	2, 5	syl5com 29	1 ⊢ (Ind 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → suc 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1402   ∈ wcel 2209  ∀wral 2528  ∅c0 3520  suc csuc 4508  Ind wind 16935

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-ext 2220

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1405  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-ral 2533  df-v 2823  df-un 3224  df-sn 3714  df-suc 4514  df-bj-ind 16936

This theorem is referenced by:  bj-indint  16940  bj-peano2  16948  bj-inf2vnlem2  16980