Theorem bj-indsuc 16544

Description: A direct consequence of the definition of Ind. (Contributed by BJ, 30-Nov-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-indsuc	⊢ (Ind 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → suc 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))

Proof of Theorem bj-indsuc

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-bj-ind 16543	. . 3 ⊢ (Ind 𝐴 ↔ (∅ ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 suc 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
2	1	simprbi 275	. 2 ⊢ (Ind 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 suc 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
3		suceq 4499	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → suc 𝑥 = suc 𝐵)
4	3	eleq1d 2300	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (suc 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ suc 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
5	4	rspcv 2906	. 2 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 suc 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → suc 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
6	2, 5	syl5com 29	1 ⊢ (Ind 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → suc 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1397   ∈ wcel 2202  ∀wral 2510  ∅c0 3494  suc csuc 4462  Ind wind 16542

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 716  ax-5 1495  ax-7 1496  ax-gen 1497  ax-ie1 1541  ax-ie2 1542  ax-8 1552  ax-10 1553  ax-11 1554  ax-i12 1555  ax-bndl 1557  ax-4 1558  ax-17 1574  ax-i9 1578  ax-ial 1582  ax-i5r 1583  ax-ext 2213

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1400  df-nf 1509  df-sb 1811  df-clab 2218  df-cleq 2224  df-clel 2227  df-nfc 2363  df-ral 2515  df-v 2804  df-un 3204  df-sn 3675  df-suc 4468  df-bj-ind 16543

This theorem is referenced by:  bj-indint  16547  bj-peano2  16555  bj-inf2vnlem2  16587