Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > dfrab2 | GIF version |
Description: Alternate definition of restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2003.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
dfrab2 | ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝐴) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | df-rab 2457 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
2 | inab 3395 | . . 3 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
3 | abid2 2291 | . . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴 | |
4 | 3 | ineq1i 3324 | . . 3 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) = (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) |
5 | 2, 4 | eqtr3i 2193 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} = (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) |
6 | incom 3319 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) = ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝐴) | |
7 | 1, 5, 6 | 3eqtri 2195 | 1 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝐴) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: ∧ wa 103 = wceq 1348 ∈ wcel 2141 {cab 2156 {crab 2452 ∩ cin 3120 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-io 704 ax-5 1440 ax-7 1441 ax-gen 1442 ax-ie1 1486 ax-ie2 1487 ax-8 1497 ax-10 1498 ax-11 1499 ax-i12 1500 ax-bndl 1502 ax-4 1503 ax-17 1519 ax-i9 1523 ax-ial 1527 ax-i5r 1528 ax-ext 2152 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-tru 1351 df-nf 1454 df-sb 1756 df-clab 2157 df-cleq 2163 df-clel 2166 df-nfc 2301 df-rab 2457 df-v 2732 df-in 3127 |
This theorem is referenced by: minmax 11193 xrminmax 11228 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |