Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > dfrab2 | GIF version |
Description: Alternate definition of restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2003.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
dfrab2 | ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝐴) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | df-rab 2453 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
2 | inab 3390 | . . 3 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
3 | abid2 2287 | . . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴 | |
4 | 3 | ineq1i 3319 | . . 3 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) = (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) |
5 | 2, 4 | eqtr3i 2188 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} = (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) |
6 | incom 3314 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) = ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝐴) | |
7 | 1, 5, 6 | 3eqtri 2190 | 1 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝐴) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: ∧ wa 103 = wceq 1343 ∈ wcel 2136 {cab 2151 {crab 2448 ∩ cin 3115 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-io 699 ax-5 1435 ax-7 1436 ax-gen 1437 ax-ie1 1481 ax-ie2 1482 ax-8 1492 ax-10 1493 ax-11 1494 ax-i12 1495 ax-bndl 1497 ax-4 1498 ax-17 1514 ax-i9 1518 ax-ial 1522 ax-i5r 1523 ax-ext 2147 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-tru 1346 df-nf 1449 df-sb 1751 df-clab 2152 df-cleq 2158 df-clel 2161 df-nfc 2297 df-rab 2453 df-v 2728 df-in 3122 |
This theorem is referenced by: minmax 11171 xrminmax 11206 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |