| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > iinss | GIF version | ||
| Description: Subset implication for an indexed intersection. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| iinss | ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 → ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vex 2805 | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V | |
| 2 | eliin 3975 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ V → (𝑦 ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | ax-mp 5 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) |
| 4 | ssel 3221 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) | |
| 5 | 4 | reximi 2629 | . . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) |
| 6 | r19.36av 2684 | . . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) | |
| 7 | 5, 6 | syl 14 | . . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) |
| 8 | 3, 7 | biimtrid 152 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 → (𝑦 ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) |
| 9 | 8 | ssrdv 3233 | 1 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 → ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 105 ∈ wcel 2202 ∀wral 2510 ∃wrex 2511 Vcvv 2802 ⊆ wss 3200 ∩ ciin 3971 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-io 716 ax-5 1495 ax-7 1496 ax-gen 1497 ax-ie1 1541 ax-ie2 1542 ax-8 1552 ax-10 1553 ax-11 1554 ax-i12 1555 ax-bndl 1557 ax-4 1558 ax-17 1574 ax-i9 1578 ax-ial 1582 ax-i5r 1583 ax-ext 2213 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-tru 1400 df-nf 1509 df-sb 1811 df-clab 2218 df-cleq 2224 df-clel 2227 df-nfc 2363 df-ral 2515 df-rex 2516 df-v 2804 df-in 3206 df-ss 3213 df-iin 3973 |
| This theorem is referenced by: riinm 4043 reliin 4849 cnviinm 5278 iinerm 6775 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |