| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > iinss | GIF version | ||
| Description: Subset implication for an indexed intersection. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| iinss | ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 → ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vex 2766 | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V | |
| 2 | eliin 3922 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ V → (𝑦 ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | ax-mp 5 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) |
| 4 | ssel 3178 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) | |
| 5 | 4 | reximi 2594 | . . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) |
| 6 | r19.36av 2648 | . . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) | |
| 7 | 5, 6 | syl 14 | . . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) |
| 8 | 3, 7 | biimtrid 152 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 → (𝑦 ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) |
| 9 | 8 | ssrdv 3190 | 1 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 → ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 105 ∈ wcel 2167 ∀wral 2475 ∃wrex 2476 Vcvv 2763 ⊆ wss 3157 ∩ ciin 3918 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-io 710 ax-5 1461 ax-7 1462 ax-gen 1463 ax-ie1 1507 ax-ie2 1508 ax-8 1518 ax-10 1519 ax-11 1520 ax-i12 1521 ax-bndl 1523 ax-4 1524 ax-17 1540 ax-i9 1544 ax-ial 1548 ax-i5r 1549 ax-ext 2178 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-tru 1367 df-nf 1475 df-sb 1777 df-clab 2183 df-cleq 2189 df-clel 2192 df-nfc 2328 df-ral 2480 df-rex 2481 df-v 2765 df-in 3163 df-ss 3170 df-iin 3920 |
| This theorem is referenced by: riinm 3990 reliin 4786 cnviinm 5212 iinerm 6675 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |