Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 3901-4000 *Has distinct variable
group(s)
| Type | Label | Description |
| Statement |
| |
| Theorem | intmin3 3901* |
Under subset ordering, the intersection of a class abstraction is less
than or equal to any of its members. (Contributed by NM,
3-Jul-2005.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ 𝜓 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | intmin4 3902* |
Elimination of a conjunct in a class intersection. (Contributed by NM,
31-Jul-2006.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ∩
{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} → ∩
{𝑥 ∣ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝜑)} = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) |
| |
| Theorem | intab 3903* |
The intersection of a special case of a class abstraction. 𝑦 may be
free in 𝜑 and 𝐴, which can be thought of
a 𝜑(𝑦) and
𝐴(𝑦). (Contributed by NM, 28-Jul-2006.)
(Proof shortened by
Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2016.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴)} ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ∩
{𝑥 ∣ ∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥)} = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴)} |
| |
| Theorem | int0el 3904 |
The intersection of a class containing the empty set is empty.
(Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2004.)
|
| ⊢ (∅ ∈ 𝐴 → ∩ 𝐴 = ∅) |
| |
| Theorem | intun 3905 |
The class intersection of the union of two classes. Theorem 78 of
[Suppes] p. 42. (Contributed by NM,
22-Sep-2002.)
|
| ⊢ ∩ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = (∩ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | intpr 3906 |
The intersection of a pair is the intersection of its members. Theorem
71 of [Suppes] p. 42. (Contributed by
NM, 14-Oct-1999.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ ∩
{𝐴, 𝐵} = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | intprg 3907 |
The intersection of a pair is the intersection of its members. Closed
form of intpr 3906. Theorem 71 of [Suppes] p. 42. (Contributed by FL,
27-Apr-2008.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ∩
{𝐴, 𝐵} = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | intsng 3908 |
Intersection of a singleton. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear,
22-Feb-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∩ {𝐴} = 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | intsn 3909 |
The intersection of a singleton is its member. Theorem 70 of [Suppes]
p. 41. (Contributed by NM, 29-Sep-2002.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ∩
{𝐴} = 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | uniintsnr 3910* |
The union and intersection of a singleton are equal. See also eusn 3696.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Aug-2018.)
|
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝐴 = {𝑥} → ∪ 𝐴 = ∩
𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | uniintabim 3911 |
The union and the intersection of a class abstraction are equal if there
is a unique satisfying value of 𝜑(𝑥). (Contributed by Jim
Kingdon, 14-Aug-2018.)
|
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) |
| |
| Theorem | intunsn 3912 |
Theorem joining a singleton to an intersection. (Contributed by NM,
29-Sep-2002.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ∩
(𝐴 ∪ {𝐵}) = (∩ 𝐴
∩ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | rint0 3913 |
Relative intersection of an empty set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear,
3-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑋 = ∅ → (𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑋) = 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | elrint 3914* |
Membership in a restricted intersection. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear,
3-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑋 ∈ 𝑦)) |
| |
| Theorem | elrint2 3915* |
Membership in a restricted intersection. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear,
3-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑋 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑋 ∈ 𝑦)) |
| |
| 2.1.20 Indexed union and
intersection
|
| |
| Syntax | ciun 3916 |
Extend class notation to include indexed union. Note: Historically
(prior to 21-Oct-2005), set.mm used the notation ∪ 𝑥
∈ 𝐴𝐵, with
the same union symbol as cuni 3839. While that syntax was unambiguous, it
did not allow for LALR parsing of the syntax constructions in set.mm. The
new syntax uses as distinguished symbol ∪ instead of ∪ and does
allow LALR parsing. Thanks to Peter Backes for suggesting this change.
|
| class ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 |
| |
| Syntax | ciin 3917 |
Extend class notation to include indexed intersection. Note:
Historically (prior to 21-Oct-2005), set.mm used the notation
∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝐵, with the same intersection symbol
as cint 3874. Although
that syntax was unambiguous, it did not allow for LALR parsing of the
syntax constructions in set.mm. The new syntax uses a distinguished
symbol ∩ instead
of ∩ and does allow LALR
parsing. Thanks to
Peter Backes for suggesting this change.
|
| class ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 |
| |
| Definition | df-iun 3918* |
Define indexed union. Definition indexed union in [Stoll] p. 45. In
most applications, 𝐴 is independent of 𝑥
(although this is not
required by the definition), and 𝐵 depends on 𝑥 i.e. can be read
informally as 𝐵(𝑥). We call 𝑥 the index, 𝐴 the
index
set, and 𝐵 the indexed set. In most books,
𝑥 ∈
𝐴 is written as
a subscript or underneath a union symbol ∪. We use a special
union symbol ∪
to make it easier to distinguish from plain class
union. In many theorems, you will see that 𝑥 and 𝐴 are in
the
same disjoint variable group (meaning 𝐴 cannot depend on 𝑥) and
that 𝐵 and 𝑥 do not share a disjoint
variable group (meaning
that can be thought of as 𝐵(𝑥) i.e. can be substituted with a
class expression containing 𝑥). An alternate definition tying
indexed union to ordinary union is dfiun2 3950. Theorem uniiun 3970 provides
a definition of ordinary union in terms of indexed union. (Contributed
by NM, 27-Jun-1998.)
|
| ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵} |
| |
| Definition | df-iin 3919* |
Define indexed intersection. Definition of [Stoll] p. 45. See the
remarks for its sibling operation of indexed union df-iun 3918. An
alternate definition tying indexed intersection to ordinary intersection
is dfiin2 3951. Theorem intiin 3971 provides a definition of ordinary
intersection in terms of indexed intersection. (Contributed by NM,
27-Jun-1998.)
|
| ⊢ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = {𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵} |
| |
| Theorem | eliun 3920* |
Membership in indexed union. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2003.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | eliin 3921* |
Membership in indexed intersection. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2003.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ ∩
𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | iuncom 3922* |
Commutation of indexed unions. (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2008.)
|
| ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 = ∪
𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 |
| |
| Theorem | iuncom4 3923 |
Commutation of union with indexed union. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 18-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 = ∪
∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 |
| |
| Theorem | iunconstm 3924* |
Indexed union of a constant class, i.e. where 𝐵 does not depend on
𝑥. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
15-Aug-2018.)
|
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | iinconstm 3925* |
Indexed intersection of a constant class, i.e. where 𝐵 does not
depend on 𝑥. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
19-Dec-2018.)
|
| ⊢ (∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ∩
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | iuniin 3926* |
Law combining indexed union with indexed intersection. Eq. 14 in
[KuratowskiMostowski] p.
109. This theorem also appears as the last
example at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union%5F%28set%5Ftheory%29.
(Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon,
25-Jul-2011.)
|
| ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ⊆ ∩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 |
| |
| Theorem | iunss1 3927* |
Subclass theorem for indexed union. (Contributed by NM, 10-Dec-2004.)
(Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | iinss1 3928* |
Subclass theorem for indexed union. (Contributed by NM,
24-Jan-2012.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ∩
𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ⊆ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | iuneq1 3929* |
Equality theorem for indexed union. (Contributed by NM,
27-Jun-1998.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | iineq1 3930* |
Equality theorem for restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by
NM, 27-Jun-1998.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ∩
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∩
𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | ss2iun 3931 |
Subclass theorem for indexed union. (Contributed by NM, 26-Nov-2003.)
(Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 → ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | iuneq2 3932 |
Equality theorem for indexed union. (Contributed by NM,
22-Oct-2003.)
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = 𝐶 → ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | iineq2 3933 |
Equality theorem for indexed intersection. (Contributed by NM,
22-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = 𝐶 → ∩
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∩
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | iuneq2i 3934 |
Equality inference for indexed union. (Contributed by NM,
22-Oct-2003.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 |
| |
| Theorem | iineq2i 3935 |
Equality inference for indexed intersection. (Contributed by NM,
22-Oct-2003.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∩
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 |
| |
| Theorem | iineq2d 3936 |
Equality deduction for indexed intersection. (Contributed by NM,
7-Dec-2011.)
|
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
& ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∩
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∩
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | iuneq2dv 3937* |
Equality deduction for indexed union. (Contributed by NM,
3-Aug-2004.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | iineq2dv 3938* |
Equality deduction for indexed intersection. (Contributed by NM,
3-Aug-2004.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∩
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∩
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | iuneq1d 3939* |
Equality theorem for indexed union, deduction version. (Contributed by
Drahflow, 22-Oct-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | iuneq12d 3940* |
Equality deduction for indexed union, deduction version. (Contributed
by Drahflow, 22-Oct-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷) |
| |
| Theorem | iuneq2d 3941* |
Equality deduction for indexed union. (Contributed by Drahflow,
22-Oct-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | nfiunxy 3942* |
Bound-variable hypothesis builder for indexed union. (Contributed by
Mario Carneiro, 25-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 |
| |
| Theorem | nfiinxy 3943* |
Bound-variable hypothesis builder for indexed intersection.
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 |
| |
| Theorem | nfiunya 3944* |
Bound-variable hypothesis builder for indexed union. (Contributed by
Mario Carneiro, 25-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 |
| |
| Theorem | nfiinya 3945* |
Bound-variable hypothesis builder for indexed intersection.
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 |
| |
| Theorem | nfiu1 3946 |
Bound-variable hypothesis builder for indexed union. (Contributed by
NM, 12-Oct-2003.)
|
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 |
| |
| Theorem | nfii1 3947 |
Bound-variable hypothesis builder for indexed intersection.
(Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-2003.)
|
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 |
| |
| Theorem | dfiun2g 3948* |
Alternate definition of indexed union when 𝐵 is a set. Definition
15(a) of [Suppes] p. 44. (Contributed by
NM, 23-Mar-2006.) (Proof
shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = 𝐵}) |
| |
| Theorem | dfiin2g 3949* |
Alternate definition of indexed intersection when 𝐵 is a set.
(Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 27-Aug-2009.)
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → ∩
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∩ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = 𝐵}) |
| |
| Theorem | dfiun2 3950* |
Alternate definition of indexed union when 𝐵 is a set. Definition
15(a) of [Suppes] p. 44. (Contributed by
NM, 27-Jun-1998.) (Revised by
David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = 𝐵} |
| |
| Theorem | dfiin2 3951* |
Alternate definition of indexed intersection when 𝐵 is a set.
Definition 15(b) of [Suppes] p. 44.
(Contributed by NM, 28-Jun-1998.)
(Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∩ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = 𝐵} |
| |
| Theorem | dfiunv2 3952* |
Define double indexed union. (Contributed by FL, 6-Nov-2013.)
|
| ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶} |
| |
| Theorem | cbviun 3953* |
Rule used to change the bound variables in an indexed union, with the
substitution specified implicitly by the hypothesis. (Contributed by
NM, 26-Mar-2006.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
|
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶
& ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∪
𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 |
| |
| Theorem | cbviin 3954* |
Change bound variables in an indexed intersection. (Contributed by Jeff
Hankins, 26-Aug-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
|
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶
& ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∩
𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 |
| |
| Theorem | cbviunv 3955* |
Rule used to change the bound variables in an indexed union, with the
substitution specified implicitly by the hypothesis. (Contributed by
NM, 15-Sep-2003.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∪
𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 |
| |
| Theorem | cbviinv 3956* |
Change bound variables in an indexed intersection. (Contributed by Jeff
Hankins, 26-Aug-2009.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∩
𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 |
| |
| Theorem | iunss 3957* |
Subset theorem for an indexed union. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2003.)
(Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
|
| ⊢ (∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | ssiun 3958* |
Subset implication for an indexed union. (Contributed by NM,
3-Sep-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
|
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝐶 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | ssiun2 3959 |
Identity law for subset of an indexed union. (Contributed by NM,
12-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | ssiun2s 3960* |
Subset relationship for an indexed union. (Contributed by NM,
26-Oct-2003.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → 𝐵 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐷 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | iunss2 3961* |
A subclass condition on the members of two indexed classes 𝐶(𝑥)
and 𝐷(𝑦) that implies a subclass relation on
their indexed
unions. Generalization of Proposition 8.6 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 59.
Compare uniss2 3870. (Contributed by NM, 9-Dec-2004.)
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 → ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 ⊆ ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷) |
| |
| Theorem | iunssd 3962* |
Subset theorem for an indexed union. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi,
8-Apr-2021.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | iunab 3963* |
The indexed union of a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM,
27-Dec-2004.)
|
| ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} |
| |
| Theorem | iunrab 3964* |
The indexed union of a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by
NM, 3-Jan-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2016.)
|
| ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} |
| |
| Theorem | iunxdif2 3965* |
Indexed union with a class difference as its index. (Contributed by NM,
10-Dec-2004.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 → ∪
𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)𝐷 = ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | ssiinf 3966 |
Subset theorem for an indexed intersection. (Contributed by FL,
15-Oct-2012.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
|
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ⊆ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | ssiin 3967* |
Subset theorem for an indexed intersection. (Contributed by NM,
15-Oct-2003.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐶 ⊆ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | iinss 3968* |
Subset implication for an indexed intersection. (Contributed by NM,
15-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
|
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 → ∩
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | iinss2 3969 |
An indexed intersection is included in any of its members. (Contributed
by FL, 15-Oct-2012.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∩
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | uniiun 3970* |
Class union in terms of indexed union. Definition in [Stoll] p. 43.
(Contributed by NM, 28-Jun-1998.)
|
| ⊢ ∪ 𝐴 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 |
| |
| Theorem | intiin 3971* |
Class intersection in terms of indexed intersection. Definition in
[Stoll] p. 44. (Contributed by NM,
28-Jun-1998.)
|
| ⊢ ∩ 𝐴 = ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 |
| |
| Theorem | iunid 3972* |
An indexed union of singletons recovers the index set. (Contributed by
NM, 6-Sep-2005.)
|
| ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 {𝑥} = 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | iun0 3973 |
An indexed union of the empty set is empty. (Contributed by NM,
26-Mar-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
|
| ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∅ = ∅ |
| |
| Theorem | 0iun 3974 |
An empty indexed union is empty. (Contributed by NM, 4-Dec-2004.)
(Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
|
| ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ ∅ 𝐴 = ∅ |
| |
| Theorem | 0iin 3975 |
An empty indexed intersection is the universal class. (Contributed by
NM, 20-Oct-2005.)
|
| ⊢ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ ∅ 𝐴 = V |
| |
| Theorem | viin 3976* |
Indexed intersection with a universal index class. (Contributed by NM,
11-Sep-2008.)
|
| ⊢ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ V 𝐴 = {𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴} |
| |
| Theorem | iunn0m 3977* |
There is an inhabited class in an indexed collection 𝐵(𝑥) iff the
indexed union of them is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
16-Aug-2018.)
|
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | iinab 3978* |
Indexed intersection of a class builder. (Contributed by NM,
6-Dec-2011.)
|
| ⊢ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} |
| |
| Theorem | iinrabm 3979* |
Indexed intersection of a restricted class builder. (Contributed by Jim
Kingdon, 16-Aug-2018.)
|
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∩
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑}) |
| |
| Theorem | iunin2 3980* |
Indexed union of intersection. Generalization of half of theorem
"Distributive laws" in [Enderton] p. 30. Use uniiun 3970 to recover
Enderton's theorem. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2004.)
|
| ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∩ ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | iunin1 3981* |
Indexed union of intersection. Generalization of half of theorem
"Distributive laws" in [Enderton] p. 30. Use uniiun 3970 to recover
Enderton's theorem. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Aug-2015.)
|
| ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) = (∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | iundif2ss 3982* |
Indexed union of class difference. Compare to theorem "De Morgan's
laws" in [Enderton] p. 31.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
17-Aug-2018.)
|
| ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 ∖ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | 2iunin 3983* |
Rearrange indexed unions over intersection. (Contributed by NM,
18-Dec-2008.)
|
| ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = (∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 ∩ ∪
𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷) |
| |
| Theorem | iindif2m 3984* |
Indexed intersection of class difference. Compare to Theorem "De
Morgan's laws" in [Enderton] p.
31. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
17-Aug-2018.)
|
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∩
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∖ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | iinin2m 3985* |
Indexed intersection of intersection. Compare to Theorem "Distributive
laws" in [Enderton] p. 30.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
17-Aug-2018.)
|
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∩
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∩ ∩
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | iinin1m 3986* |
Indexed intersection of intersection. Compare to Theorem "Distributive
laws" in [Enderton] p. 30.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
17-Aug-2018.)
|
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∩
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) = (∩
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 ∩ 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | elriin 3987* |
Elementhood in a relative intersection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
30-Dec-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ ∩
𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 𝑆) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)) |
| |
| Theorem | riin0 3988* |
Relative intersection of an empty family. (Contributed by Stefan
O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑋 = ∅ → (𝐴 ∩ ∩
𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 𝑆) = 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | riinm 3989* |
Relative intersection of an inhabited family. (Contributed by Jim
Kingdon, 19-Aug-2018.)
|
| ⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐴 ∩ ∩
𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 𝑆) = ∩
𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 𝑆) |
| |
| Theorem | iinxsng 3990* |
A singleton index picks out an instance of an indexed intersection's
argument. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jan-2012.) (Proof shortened by Mario
Carneiro, 17-Nov-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∩
𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝐵 = 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | iinxprg 3991* |
Indexed intersection with an unordered pair index. (Contributed by NM,
25-Jan-2012.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)
& ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → 𝐶 = 𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ∩ 𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝐶 = (𝐷 ∩ 𝐸)) |
| |
| Theorem | iunxsng 3992* |
A singleton index picks out an instance of an indexed union's argument.
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∪
𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝐵 = 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | iunxsn 3993* |
A singleton index picks out an instance of an indexed union's argument.
(Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro,
25-Jun-2016.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝐵 = 𝐶 |
| |
| Theorem | iunxsngf 3994* |
A singleton index picks out an instance of an indexed union's argument.
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2016.) (Revised by Thierry
Arnoux, 2-May-2020.)
|
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶
& ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∪
𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝐵 = 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | iunun 3995 |
Separate a union in an indexed union. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-2004.)
(Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2016.)
|
| ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) = (∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∪ ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | iunxun 3996 |
Separate a union in the index of an indexed union. (Contributed by NM,
26-Mar-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2016.)
|
| ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)𝐶 = (∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 ∪ ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | iunxprg 3997* |
A pair index picks out two instances of an indexed union's argument.
(Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Feb-2018.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)
& ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → 𝐶 = 𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝐶 = (𝐷 ∪ 𝐸)) |
| |
| Theorem | iunxiun 3998* |
Separate an indexed union in the index of an indexed union.
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Dec-2016.)
|
| ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵𝐶 = ∪
𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 |
| |
| Theorem | iinuniss 3999* |
A relationship involving union and indexed intersection. Exercise 23 of
[Enderton] p. 33 but with equality
changed to subset. (Contributed by
Jim Kingdon, 19-Aug-2018.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∪ ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐴 ∪ 𝑥) |
| |
| Theorem | iununir 4000* |
A relationship involving union and indexed union. Exercise 25 of
[Enderton] p. 33 but with biconditional
changed to implication.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Aug-2018.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∪ ∪ 𝐵) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐴 ∪ 𝑥) → (𝐵 = ∅ → 𝐴 = ∅)) |