Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 3901-4000 *Has distinct variable
group(s)
| Type | Label | Description |
| Statement |
| |
| Theorem | unimax 3901* |
Any member of a class is the largest of those members that it includes.
(Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2002.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴} = 𝐴) |
| |
| 2.1.19 The intersection of a class
|
| |
| Syntax | cint 3902 |
Extend class notation to include the intersection of a class. Read:
"intersection (of) 𝐴".
|
| class ∩ 𝐴 |
| |
| Definition | df-int 3903* |
Define the intersection of a class. Definition 7.35 of [TakeutiZaring]
p. 44. For example, ∩ {{1,
3}, {1, 8}} = {1}.
Compare this with the intersection of two classes, df-in 3183.
(Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.)
|
| ⊢ ∩ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦)} |
| |
| Theorem | dfint2 3904* |
Alternate definition of class intersection. (Contributed by NM,
28-Jun-1998.)
|
| ⊢ ∩ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦} |
| |
| Theorem | inteq 3905 |
Equality law for intersection. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-1999.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ∩ 𝐴 = ∩
𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | inteqi 3906 |
Equality inference for class intersection. (Contributed by NM,
2-Sep-2003.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ ∩
𝐴 = ∩ 𝐵 |
| |
| Theorem | inteqd 3907 |
Equality deduction for class intersection. (Contributed by NM,
2-Sep-2003.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∩ 𝐴 = ∩
𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | elint 3908* |
Membership in class intersection. (Contributed by NM, 21-May-1994.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∩ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥)) |
| |
| Theorem | elint2 3909* |
Membership in class intersection. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-1999.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∩ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥) |
| |
| Theorem | elintg 3910* |
Membership in class intersection, with the sethood requirement expressed
as an antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 20-Nov-2003.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ ∩ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥)) |
| |
| Theorem | elinti 3911 |
Membership in class intersection. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-1999.)
(Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∩ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | nfint 3912 |
Bound-variable hypothesis builder for intersection. (Contributed by NM,
2-Feb-1997.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.)
|
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∩
𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | elintab 3913* |
Membership in the intersection of a class abstraction. (Contributed by
NM, 30-Aug-1993.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥)) |
| |
| Theorem | elintrab 3914* |
Membership in the intersection of a class abstraction. (Contributed by
NM, 17-Oct-1999.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥)) |
| |
| Theorem | elintrabg 3915* |
Membership in the intersection of a class abstraction. (Contributed by
NM, 17-Feb-2007.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥))) |
| |
| Theorem | int0 3916 |
The intersection of the empty set is the universal class. Exercise 2 of
[TakeutiZaring] p. 44.
(Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.)
|
| ⊢ ∩ ∅ =
V |
| |
| Theorem | intss1 3917 |
An element of a class includes the intersection of the class. Exercise
4 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 44 (with
correction), generalized to classes.
(Contributed by NM, 18-Nov-1995.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ∩ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | ssint 3918* |
Subclass of a class intersection. Theorem 5.11(viii) of [Monk1] p. 52
and its converse. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-1999.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ∩ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥) |
| |
| Theorem | ssintab 3919* |
Subclass of the intersection of a class abstraction. (Contributed by
NM, 31-Jul-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ∩
{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥)) |
| |
| Theorem | ssintub 3920* |
Subclass of the least upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 8-Aug-2000.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ ∩
{𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥} |
| |
| Theorem | ssmin 3921* |
Subclass of the minimum value of class of supersets. (Contributed by
NM, 10-Aug-2006.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ ∩
{𝑥 ∣ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝜑)} |
| |
| Theorem | intmin 3922* |
Any member of a class is the smallest of those members that include it.
(Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2002.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon,
9-Jul-2011.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥} = 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | intss 3923 |
Intersection of subclasses. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-1999.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ∩ 𝐵 ⊆ ∩ 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | intssunim 3924* |
The intersection of an inhabited set is a subclass of its union.
(Contributed by NM, 29-Jul-2006.)
|
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∩ 𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | ssintrab 3925* |
Subclass of the intersection of a restricted class builder.
(Contributed by NM, 30-Jan-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ∩
{𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥)) |
| |
| Theorem | intssuni2m 3926* |
Subclass relationship for intersection and union. (Contributed by Jim
Kingdon, 14-Aug-2018.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∩ 𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | intminss 3927* |
Under subset ordering, the intersection of a restricted class
abstraction is less than or equal to any of its members. (Contributed
by NM, 7-Sep-2013.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓) → ∩
{𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | intmin2 3928* |
Any set is the smallest of all sets that include it. (Contributed by
NM, 20-Sep-2003.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ∩
{𝑥 ∣ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥} = 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | intmin3 3929* |
Under subset ordering, the intersection of a class abstraction is less
than or equal to any of its members. (Contributed by NM,
3-Jul-2005.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ 𝜓 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | intmin4 3930* |
Elimination of a conjunct in a class intersection. (Contributed by NM,
31-Jul-2006.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ∩
{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} → ∩
{𝑥 ∣ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝜑)} = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) |
| |
| Theorem | intab 3931* |
The intersection of a special case of a class abstraction. 𝑦 may be
free in 𝜑 and 𝐴, which can be thought of
a 𝜑(𝑦) and
𝐴(𝑦). (Contributed by NM, 28-Jul-2006.)
(Proof shortened by
Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2016.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴)} ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ∩
{𝑥 ∣ ∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥)} = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴)} |
| |
| Theorem | int0el 3932 |
The intersection of a class containing the empty set is empty.
(Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2004.)
|
| ⊢ (∅ ∈ 𝐴 → ∩ 𝐴 = ∅) |
| |
| Theorem | intun 3933 |
The class intersection of the union of two classes. Theorem 78 of
[Suppes] p. 42. (Contributed by NM,
22-Sep-2002.)
|
| ⊢ ∩ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = (∩ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | intpr 3934 |
The intersection of a pair is the intersection of its members. Theorem
71 of [Suppes] p. 42. (Contributed by
NM, 14-Oct-1999.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ ∩
{𝐴, 𝐵} = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | intprg 3935 |
The intersection of a pair is the intersection of its members. Closed
form of intpr 3934. Theorem 71 of [Suppes] p. 42. (Contributed by FL,
27-Apr-2008.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ∩
{𝐴, 𝐵} = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | intsng 3936 |
Intersection of a singleton. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear,
22-Feb-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∩ {𝐴} = 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | intsn 3937 |
The intersection of a singleton is its member. Theorem 70 of [Suppes]
p. 41. (Contributed by NM, 29-Sep-2002.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ∩
{𝐴} = 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | uniintsnr 3938* |
The union and intersection of a singleton are equal. See also eusn 3720.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Aug-2018.)
|
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝐴 = {𝑥} → ∪ 𝐴 = ∩
𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | uniintabim 3939 |
The union and the intersection of a class abstraction are equal if there
is a unique satisfying value of 𝜑(𝑥). (Contributed by Jim
Kingdon, 14-Aug-2018.)
|
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) |
| |
| Theorem | intunsn 3940 |
Theorem joining a singleton to an intersection. (Contributed by NM,
29-Sep-2002.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ∩
(𝐴 ∪ {𝐵}) = (∩ 𝐴
∩ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | rint0 3941 |
Relative intersection of an empty set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear,
3-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑋 = ∅ → (𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑋) = 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | elrint 3942* |
Membership in a restricted intersection. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear,
3-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑋 ∈ 𝑦)) |
| |
| Theorem | elrint2 3943* |
Membership in a restricted intersection. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear,
3-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑋 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑋 ∈ 𝑦)) |
| |
| 2.1.20 Indexed union and
intersection
|
| |
| Syntax | ciun 3944 |
Extend class notation to include indexed union. Note: Historically
(prior to 21-Oct-2005), set.mm used the notation ∪ 𝑥
∈ 𝐴𝐵, with
the same union symbol as cuni 3867. While that syntax was unambiguous, it
did not allow for LALR parsing of the syntax constructions in set.mm. The
new syntax uses as distinguished symbol ∪ instead of ∪ and does
allow LALR parsing. Thanks to Peter Backes for suggesting this change.
|
| class ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 |
| |
| Syntax | ciin 3945 |
Extend class notation to include indexed intersection. Note:
Historically (prior to 21-Oct-2005), set.mm used the notation
∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝐵, with the same intersection symbol
as cint 3902. Although
that syntax was unambiguous, it did not allow for LALR parsing of the
syntax constructions in set.mm. The new syntax uses a distinguished
symbol ∩ instead
of ∩ and does allow LALR
parsing. Thanks to
Peter Backes for suggesting this change.
|
| class ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 |
| |
| Definition | df-iun 3946* |
Define indexed union. Definition indexed union in [Stoll] p. 45. In
most applications, 𝐴 is independent of 𝑥
(although this is not
required by the definition), and 𝐵 depends on 𝑥 i.e. can be read
informally as 𝐵(𝑥). We call 𝑥 the index, 𝐴 the
index
set, and 𝐵 the indexed set. In most books,
𝑥 ∈
𝐴 is written as
a subscript or underneath a union symbol ∪. We use a special
union symbol ∪
to make it easier to distinguish from plain class
union. In many theorems, you will see that 𝑥 and 𝐴 are in
the
same disjoint variable group (meaning 𝐴 cannot depend on 𝑥) and
that 𝐵 and 𝑥 do not share a disjoint
variable group (meaning
that can be thought of as 𝐵(𝑥) i.e. can be substituted with a
class expression containing 𝑥). An alternate definition tying
indexed union to ordinary union is dfiun2 3978. Theorem uniiun 3998 provides
a definition of ordinary union in terms of indexed union. (Contributed
by NM, 27-Jun-1998.)
|
| ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵} |
| |
| Definition | df-iin 3947* |
Define indexed intersection. Definition of [Stoll] p. 45. See the
remarks for its sibling operation of indexed union df-iun 3946. An
alternate definition tying indexed intersection to ordinary intersection
is dfiin2 3979. Theorem intiin 3999 provides a definition of ordinary
intersection in terms of indexed intersection. (Contributed by NM,
27-Jun-1998.)
|
| ⊢ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = {𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵} |
| |
| Theorem | eliun 3948* |
Membership in indexed union. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2003.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | eliin 3949* |
Membership in indexed intersection. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2003.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ ∩
𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | iuncom 3950* |
Commutation of indexed unions. (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2008.)
|
| ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 = ∪
𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 |
| |
| Theorem | iuncom4 3951 |
Commutation of union with indexed union. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 18-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 = ∪
∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 |
| |
| Theorem | iunconstm 3952* |
Indexed union of a constant class, i.e. where 𝐵 does not depend on
𝑥. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
15-Aug-2018.)
|
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | iinconstm 3953* |
Indexed intersection of a constant class, i.e. where 𝐵 does not
depend on 𝑥. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
19-Dec-2018.)
|
| ⊢ (∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ∩
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | iuniin 3954* |
Law combining indexed union with indexed intersection. Eq. 14 in
[KuratowskiMostowski] p.
109. This theorem also appears as the last
example at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union%5F%28set%5Ftheory%29.
(Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon,
25-Jul-2011.)
|
| ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ⊆ ∩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 |
| |
| Theorem | iunss1 3955* |
Subclass theorem for indexed union. (Contributed by NM, 10-Dec-2004.)
(Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | iinss1 3956* |
Subclass theorem for indexed union. (Contributed by NM,
24-Jan-2012.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ∩
𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ⊆ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | iuneq1 3957* |
Equality theorem for indexed union. (Contributed by NM,
27-Jun-1998.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | iineq1 3958* |
Equality theorem for restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by
NM, 27-Jun-1998.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ∩
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∩
𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | ss2iun 3959 |
Subclass theorem for indexed union. (Contributed by NM, 26-Nov-2003.)
(Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 → ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | iuneq2 3960 |
Equality theorem for indexed union. (Contributed by NM,
22-Oct-2003.)
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = 𝐶 → ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | iineq2 3961 |
Equality theorem for indexed intersection. (Contributed by NM,
22-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = 𝐶 → ∩
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∩
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | iuneq2i 3962 |
Equality inference for indexed union. (Contributed by NM,
22-Oct-2003.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 |
| |
| Theorem | iineq2i 3963 |
Equality inference for indexed intersection. (Contributed by NM,
22-Oct-2003.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∩
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 |
| |
| Theorem | iineq2d 3964 |
Equality deduction for indexed intersection. (Contributed by NM,
7-Dec-2011.)
|
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
& ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∩
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∩
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | iuneq2dv 3965* |
Equality deduction for indexed union. (Contributed by NM,
3-Aug-2004.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | iineq2dv 3966* |
Equality deduction for indexed intersection. (Contributed by NM,
3-Aug-2004.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∩
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∩
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | iuneq1d 3967* |
Equality theorem for indexed union, deduction version. (Contributed by
Drahflow, 22-Oct-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | iuneq12d 3968* |
Equality deduction for indexed union, deduction version. (Contributed
by Drahflow, 22-Oct-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷) |
| |
| Theorem | iuneq2d 3969* |
Equality deduction for indexed union. (Contributed by Drahflow,
22-Oct-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | nfiunxy 3970* |
Bound-variable hypothesis builder for indexed union. (Contributed by
Mario Carneiro, 25-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 |
| |
| Theorem | nfiinxy 3971* |
Bound-variable hypothesis builder for indexed intersection.
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 |
| |
| Theorem | nfiunya 3972* |
Bound-variable hypothesis builder for indexed union. (Contributed by
Mario Carneiro, 25-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 |
| |
| Theorem | nfiinya 3973* |
Bound-variable hypothesis builder for indexed intersection.
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 |
| |
| Theorem | nfiu1 3974 |
Bound-variable hypothesis builder for indexed union. (Contributed by
NM, 12-Oct-2003.)
|
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 |
| |
| Theorem | nfii1 3975 |
Bound-variable hypothesis builder for indexed intersection.
(Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-2003.)
|
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 |
| |
| Theorem | dfiun2g 3976* |
Alternate definition of indexed union when 𝐵 is a set. Definition
15(a) of [Suppes] p. 44. (Contributed by
NM, 23-Mar-2006.) (Proof
shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = 𝐵}) |
| |
| Theorem | dfiin2g 3977* |
Alternate definition of indexed intersection when 𝐵 is a set.
(Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 27-Aug-2009.)
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → ∩
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∩ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = 𝐵}) |
| |
| Theorem | dfiun2 3978* |
Alternate definition of indexed union when 𝐵 is a set. Definition
15(a) of [Suppes] p. 44. (Contributed by
NM, 27-Jun-1998.) (Revised by
David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = 𝐵} |
| |
| Theorem | dfiin2 3979* |
Alternate definition of indexed intersection when 𝐵 is a set.
Definition 15(b) of [Suppes] p. 44.
(Contributed by NM, 28-Jun-1998.)
(Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∩ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = 𝐵} |
| |
| Theorem | dfiunv2 3980* |
Define double indexed union. (Contributed by FL, 6-Nov-2013.)
|
| ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶} |
| |
| Theorem | cbviun 3981* |
Rule used to change the bound variables in an indexed union, with the
substitution specified implicitly by the hypothesis. (Contributed by
NM, 26-Mar-2006.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
|
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶
& ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∪
𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 |
| |
| Theorem | cbviin 3982* |
Change bound variables in an indexed intersection. (Contributed by Jeff
Hankins, 26-Aug-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
|
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶
& ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∩
𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 |
| |
| Theorem | cbviunv 3983* |
Rule used to change the bound variables in an indexed union, with the
substitution specified implicitly by the hypothesis. (Contributed by
NM, 15-Sep-2003.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∪
𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 |
| |
| Theorem | cbviinv 3984* |
Change bound variables in an indexed intersection. (Contributed by Jeff
Hankins, 26-Aug-2009.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∩
𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 |
| |
| Theorem | iunss 3985* |
Subset theorem for an indexed union. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2003.)
(Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
|
| ⊢ (∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | ssiun 3986* |
Subset implication for an indexed union. (Contributed by NM,
3-Sep-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
|
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝐶 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | ssiun2 3987 |
Identity law for subset of an indexed union. (Contributed by NM,
12-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | ssiun2s 3988* |
Subset relationship for an indexed union. (Contributed by NM,
26-Oct-2003.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → 𝐵 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐷 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | iunss2 3989* |
A subclass condition on the members of two indexed classes 𝐶(𝑥)
and 𝐷(𝑦) that implies a subclass relation on
their indexed
unions. Generalization of Proposition 8.6 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 59.
Compare uniss2 3898. (Contributed by NM, 9-Dec-2004.)
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 → ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 ⊆ ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷) |
| |
| Theorem | iunssd 3990* |
Subset theorem for an indexed union. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi,
8-Apr-2021.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | iunab 3991* |
The indexed union of a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM,
27-Dec-2004.)
|
| ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} |
| |
| Theorem | iunrab 3992* |
The indexed union of a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by
NM, 3-Jan-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2016.)
|
| ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} |
| |
| Theorem | iunxdif2 3993* |
Indexed union with a class difference as its index. (Contributed by NM,
10-Dec-2004.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 → ∪
𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)𝐷 = ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | ssiinf 3994 |
Subset theorem for an indexed intersection. (Contributed by FL,
15-Oct-2012.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
|
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ⊆ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | ssiin 3995* |
Subset theorem for an indexed intersection. (Contributed by NM,
15-Oct-2003.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐶 ⊆ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | iinss 3996* |
Subset implication for an indexed intersection. (Contributed by NM,
15-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
|
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 → ∩
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | iinss2 3997 |
An indexed intersection is included in any of its members. (Contributed
by FL, 15-Oct-2012.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∩
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | uniiun 3998* |
Class union in terms of indexed union. Definition in [Stoll] p. 43.
(Contributed by NM, 28-Jun-1998.)
|
| ⊢ ∪ 𝐴 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 |
| |
| Theorem | intiin 3999* |
Class intersection in terms of indexed intersection. Definition in
[Stoll] p. 44. (Contributed by NM,
28-Jun-1998.)
|
| ⊢ ∩ 𝐴 = ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 |
| |
| Theorem | iunid 4000* |
An indexed union of singletons recovers the index set. (Contributed by
NM, 6-Sep-2005.)
|
| ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 {𝑥} = 𝐴 |