Theorem mpo0 6101

Description: A mapping operation with empty domain. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
mpo0	⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ∅, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) = ∅

Proof of Theorem mpo0

Dummy variables 𝑤 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-mpo 6033	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ∅, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ ∅ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶)}
2		df-oprab 6032	. 2 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ ∅ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶)} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ ∅ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶))}
3		noel 3500	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ ∅
4		simprll 539	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ ∅ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶)) → 𝑥 ∈ ∅)
5	3, 4	mto 668	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ¬ (𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ ∅ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶))
6	5	nex 1549	. . . . 5 ⊢ ¬ ∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ ∅ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶))
7	6	nex 1549	. . . 4 ⊢ ¬ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ ∅ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶))
8	7	nex 1549	. . 3 ⊢ ¬ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ ∅ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶))
9	8	abf 3540	. 2 ⊢ {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ ∅ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶))} = ∅
10	1, 2, 9	3eqtri 2256	1 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ∅, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) = ∅

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 104   = wceq 1398  ∃wex 1541   ∈ wcel 2202  {cab 2217  ∅c0 3496  ⟨cop 3676  {coprab 6029   ∈ cmpo 6030

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 619  ax-in2 620  ax-io 717  ax-5 1496  ax-7 1497  ax-gen 1498  ax-ie1 1542  ax-ie2 1543  ax-8 1553  ax-10 1554  ax-11 1555  ax-i12 1556  ax-bndl 1558  ax-4 1559  ax-17 1575  ax-i9 1579  ax-ial 1583  ax-i5r 1584  ax-ext 2213

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1401  df-fal 1404  df-nf 1510  df-sb 1811  df-clab 2218  df-cleq 2224  df-clel 2227  df-nfc 2364  df-v 2805  df-dif 3203  df-in 3207  df-ss 3214  df-nul 3497  df-oprab 6032  df-mpo 6033

This theorem is referenced by: (None)