| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > nfopab | GIF version | ||
| Description: Bound-variable hypothesis builder for class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 1-Sep-1999.) Remove disjoint variable conditions. (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| nfopab.1 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| nfopab | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧{〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | df-opab 4188 | . 2 ⊢ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
| 2 | nfv 1581 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧 𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 | |
| 3 | nfopab.1 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 | |
| 4 | 2, 3 | nfan 1618 | . . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧(𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜑) |
| 5 | 4 | nfex 1690 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧∃𝑦(𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜑) |
| 6 | 5 | nfex 1690 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜑) |
| 7 | 6 | nfab 2397 | . 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧{𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜑)} |
| 8 | 1, 7 | nfcxfr 2389 | 1 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧{〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: ∧ wa 104 = wceq 1402 Ⅎwnf 1513 ∃wex 1545 {cab 2224 Ⅎwnfc 2379 〈cop 3708 {copab 4186 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-io 721 ax-5 1500 ax-7 1501 ax-gen 1502 ax-ie1 1546 ax-ie2 1547 ax-8 1557 ax-10 1558 ax-11 1559 ax-i12 1560 ax-bndl 1562 ax-4 1563 ax-17 1579 ax-i9 1583 ax-ial 1587 ax-i5r 1588 ax-ext 2220 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-nf 1514 df-sb 1816 df-clab 2225 df-cleq 2231 df-clel 2234 df-nfc 2381 df-opab 4188 |
| This theorem is referenced by: csbopabg 4204 nfmpt 4218 nfxp 4796 nfco 4940 nfcnv 4954 nfofr 6299 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |