![]() |
Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > nfopab | GIF version |
Description: Bound-variable hypothesis builder for class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 1-Sep-1999.) Remove disjoint variable conditions. (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
nfopab.1 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
nfopab | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧{〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | df-opab 4091 | . 2 ⊢ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
2 | nfv 1539 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧 𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 | |
3 | nfopab.1 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 | |
4 | 2, 3 | nfan 1576 | . . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧(𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜑) |
5 | 4 | nfex 1648 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧∃𝑦(𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜑) |
6 | 5 | nfex 1648 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜑) |
7 | 6 | nfab 2341 | . 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧{𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜑)} |
8 | 1, 7 | nfcxfr 2333 | 1 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧{〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: ∧ wa 104 = wceq 1364 Ⅎwnf 1471 ∃wex 1503 {cab 2179 Ⅎwnfc 2323 〈cop 3621 {copab 4089 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-io 710 ax-5 1458 ax-7 1459 ax-gen 1460 ax-ie1 1504 ax-ie2 1505 ax-8 1515 ax-10 1516 ax-11 1517 ax-i12 1518 ax-bndl 1520 ax-4 1521 ax-17 1537 ax-i9 1541 ax-ial 1545 ax-i5r 1546 ax-ext 2175 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-nf 1472 df-sb 1774 df-clab 2180 df-cleq 2186 df-clel 2189 df-nfc 2325 df-opab 4091 |
This theorem is referenced by: csbopabg 4107 nfmpt 4121 nfxp 4686 nfco 4827 nfcnv 4841 nfofr 6137 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |