| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > nfopab | GIF version | ||
| Description: Bound-variable hypothesis builder for class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 1-Sep-1999.) Remove disjoint variable conditions. (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| nfopab.1 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| nfopab | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧{〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | df-opab 4105 | . 2 ⊢ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
| 2 | nfv 1550 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧 𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 | |
| 3 | nfopab.1 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 | |
| 4 | 2, 3 | nfan 1587 | . . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧(𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜑) |
| 5 | 4 | nfex 1659 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧∃𝑦(𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜑) |
| 6 | 5 | nfex 1659 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜑) |
| 7 | 6 | nfab 2352 | . 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧{𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜑)} |
| 8 | 1, 7 | nfcxfr 2344 | 1 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧{〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: ∧ wa 104 = wceq 1372 Ⅎwnf 1482 ∃wex 1514 {cab 2190 Ⅎwnfc 2334 〈cop 3635 {copab 4103 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-io 710 ax-5 1469 ax-7 1470 ax-gen 1471 ax-ie1 1515 ax-ie2 1516 ax-8 1526 ax-10 1527 ax-11 1528 ax-i12 1529 ax-bndl 1531 ax-4 1532 ax-17 1548 ax-i9 1552 ax-ial 1556 ax-i5r 1557 ax-ext 2186 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-nf 1483 df-sb 1785 df-clab 2191 df-cleq 2197 df-clel 2200 df-nfc 2336 df-opab 4105 |
| This theorem is referenced by: csbopabg 4121 nfmpt 4135 nfxp 4700 nfco 4841 nfcnv 4855 nfofr 6155 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |