![]() |
Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > nfopab | GIF version |
Description: Bound-variable hypothesis builder for class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 1-Sep-1999.) Remove disjoint variable conditions. (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
nfopab.1 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
nfopab | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧{〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | df-opab 3930 | . 2 ⊢ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
2 | nfv 1476 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧 𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 | |
3 | nfopab.1 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 | |
4 | 2, 3 | nfan 1512 | . . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧(𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜑) |
5 | 4 | nfex 1584 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧∃𝑦(𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜑) |
6 | 5 | nfex 1584 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜑) |
7 | 6 | nfab 2245 | . 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧{𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜑)} |
8 | 1, 7 | nfcxfr 2237 | 1 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧{〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: ∧ wa 103 = wceq 1299 Ⅎwnf 1404 ∃wex 1436 {cab 2086 Ⅎwnfc 2227 〈cop 3477 {copab 3928 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-io 671 ax-5 1391 ax-7 1392 ax-gen 1393 ax-ie1 1437 ax-ie2 1438 ax-8 1450 ax-10 1451 ax-11 1452 ax-i12 1453 ax-bndl 1454 ax-4 1455 ax-17 1474 ax-i9 1478 ax-ial 1482 ax-i5r 1483 ax-ext 2082 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-nf 1405 df-sb 1704 df-clab 2087 df-cleq 2093 df-clel 2096 df-nfc 2229 df-opab 3930 |
This theorem is referenced by: csbopabg 3946 nfmpt 3960 nfxp 4504 nfco 4642 nfcnv 4656 nfofr 5920 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |