Theorem nfpr 3639

Description: Bound-variable hypothesis builder for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-1995.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nfpr.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
nfpr.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfpr	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝐴, 𝐵}

Proof of Theorem nfpr

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfpr2 3608	. 2 ⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 = 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝐵)}
2		nfpr.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
3	2	nfeq2 2329	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐴
4		nfpr.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
5	4	nfeq2 2329	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐵
6	3, 5	nfor 1572	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝑦 = 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝐵)
7	6	nfab 2322	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 = 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝐵)}
8	1, 7	nfcxfr 2314	1 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝐴, 𝐵}

Syntax hints:   ∨ wo 708   = wceq 1353  {cab 2161  Ⅎwnfc 2304  {cpr 3590

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 709  ax-5 1445  ax-7 1446  ax-gen 1447  ax-ie1 1491  ax-ie2 1492  ax-8 1502  ax-10 1503  ax-11 1504  ax-i12 1505  ax-bndl 1507  ax-4 1508  ax-17 1524  ax-i9 1528  ax-ial 1532  ax-i5r 1533  ax-ext 2157

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1356  df-nf 1459  df-sb 1761  df-clab 2162  df-cleq 2168  df-clel 2171  df-nfc 2306  df-v 2737  df-un 3131  df-sn 3595  df-pr 3596

This theorem is referenced by:  nfsn  3649  nfop  3790