Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > ss2rab | GIF version |
Description: Restricted abstraction classes in a subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-1999.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ss2rab | ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | df-rab 2444 | . . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
2 | df-rab 2444 | . . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)} | |
3 | 1, 2 | sseq12i 3156 | . 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)}) |
4 | ss2ab 3196 | . 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)} ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓))) | |
5 | df-ral 2440 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))) | |
6 | imdistan 441 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓))) | |
7 | 6 | albii 1450 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓))) |
8 | 5, 7 | bitr2i 184 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓)) |
9 | 3, 4, 8 | 3bitri 205 | 1 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓)) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 103 ↔ wb 104 ∀wal 1333 ∈ wcel 2128 {cab 2143 ∀wral 2435 {crab 2439 ⊆ wss 3102 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-io 699 ax-5 1427 ax-7 1428 ax-gen 1429 ax-ie1 1473 ax-ie2 1474 ax-8 1484 ax-10 1485 ax-11 1486 ax-i12 1487 ax-bndl 1489 ax-4 1490 ax-17 1506 ax-i9 1510 ax-ial 1514 ax-i5r 1515 ax-ext 2139 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-nf 1441 df-sb 1743 df-clab 2144 df-cleq 2150 df-clel 2153 df-nfc 2288 df-ral 2440 df-rab 2444 df-in 3108 df-ss 3115 |
This theorem is referenced by: ss2rabdv 3209 ss2rabi 3210 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |