| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > rabss | GIF version | ||
| Description: Restricted class abstraction in a subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-2006.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| rabss | ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | df-rab 2492 | . . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
| 2 | 1 | sseq1i 3218 | . 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ 𝐵) |
| 3 | abss 3261 | . 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) | |
| 4 | impexp 263 | . . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))) | |
| 5 | 4 | albii 1492 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))) |
| 6 | df-ral 2488 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))) | |
| 7 | 5, 6 | bitr4i 187 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) |
| 8 | 2, 3, 7 | 3bitri 206 | 1 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 104 ↔ wb 105 ∀wal 1370 ∈ wcel 2175 {cab 2190 ∀wral 2483 {crab 2487 ⊆ wss 3165 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-io 710 ax-5 1469 ax-7 1470 ax-gen 1471 ax-ie1 1515 ax-ie2 1516 ax-8 1526 ax-10 1527 ax-11 1528 ax-i12 1529 ax-bndl 1531 ax-4 1532 ax-17 1548 ax-i9 1552 ax-ial 1556 ax-i5r 1557 ax-ext 2186 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-nf 1483 df-sb 1785 df-clab 2191 df-cleq 2197 df-clel 2200 df-nfc 2336 df-ral 2488 df-rab 2492 df-in 3171 df-ss 3178 |
| This theorem is referenced by: rabssdv 3272 dvdsssfz1 12082 phibndlem 12457 dfphi2 12461 mgmidsssn0 13134 istopon 14403 blsscls2 14883 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |