| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > rabss | GIF version | ||
| Description: Restricted class abstraction in a subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-2006.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| rabss | ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | df-rab 2519 | . . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
| 2 | 1 | sseq1i 3253 | . 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ 𝐵) |
| 3 | abss 3296 | . 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) | |
| 4 | impexp 263 | . . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))) | |
| 5 | 4 | albii 1518 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))) |
| 6 | df-ral 2515 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))) | |
| 7 | 5, 6 | bitr4i 187 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) |
| 8 | 2, 3, 7 | 3bitri 206 | 1 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 104 ↔ wb 105 ∀wal 1395 ∈ wcel 2202 {cab 2217 ∀wral 2510 {crab 2514 ⊆ wss 3200 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-io 716 ax-5 1495 ax-7 1496 ax-gen 1497 ax-ie1 1541 ax-ie2 1542 ax-8 1552 ax-10 1553 ax-11 1554 ax-i12 1555 ax-bndl 1557 ax-4 1558 ax-17 1574 ax-i9 1578 ax-ial 1582 ax-i5r 1583 ax-ext 2213 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-nf 1509 df-sb 1811 df-clab 2218 df-cleq 2224 df-clel 2227 df-nfc 2363 df-ral 2515 df-rab 2519 df-in 3206 df-ss 3213 |
| This theorem is referenced by: rabssdv 3307 dvdsssfz1 12412 phibndlem 12787 dfphi2 12791 mgmidsssn0 13466 istopon 14736 blsscls2 15216 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |