![]() |
Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > rabss | GIF version |
Description: Restricted class abstraction in a subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-2006.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rabss | ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | df-rab 2464 | . . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
2 | 1 | sseq1i 3181 | . 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ 𝐵) |
3 | abss 3224 | . 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) | |
4 | impexp 263 | . . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))) | |
5 | 4 | albii 1470 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))) |
6 | df-ral 2460 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))) | |
7 | 5, 6 | bitr4i 187 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) |
8 | 2, 3, 7 | 3bitri 206 | 1 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 104 ↔ wb 105 ∀wal 1351 ∈ wcel 2148 {cab 2163 ∀wral 2455 {crab 2459 ⊆ wss 3129 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-io 709 ax-5 1447 ax-7 1448 ax-gen 1449 ax-ie1 1493 ax-ie2 1494 ax-8 1504 ax-10 1505 ax-11 1506 ax-i12 1507 ax-bndl 1509 ax-4 1510 ax-17 1526 ax-i9 1530 ax-ial 1534 ax-i5r 1535 ax-ext 2159 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-nf 1461 df-sb 1763 df-clab 2164 df-cleq 2170 df-clel 2173 df-nfc 2308 df-ral 2460 df-rab 2464 df-in 3135 df-ss 3142 |
This theorem is referenced by: rabssdv 3235 dvdsssfz1 11850 phibndlem 12208 dfphi2 12212 mgmidsssn0 12735 istopon 13382 blsscls2 13864 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |