![]() |
Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > rabss | GIF version |
Description: Restricted class abstraction in a subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-2006.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rabss | ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | df-rab 2368 | . . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
2 | 1 | sseq1i 3050 | . 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ 𝐵) |
3 | abss 3090 | . 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) | |
4 | impexp 259 | . . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))) | |
5 | 4 | albii 1404 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))) |
6 | df-ral 2364 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))) | |
7 | 5, 6 | bitr4i 185 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) |
8 | 2, 3, 7 | 3bitri 204 | 1 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 102 ↔ wb 103 ∀wal 1287 ∈ wcel 1438 {cab 2074 ∀wral 2359 {crab 2363 ⊆ wss 2999 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 104 ax-ia2 105 ax-ia3 106 ax-io 665 ax-5 1381 ax-7 1382 ax-gen 1383 ax-ie1 1427 ax-ie2 1428 ax-8 1440 ax-10 1441 ax-11 1442 ax-i12 1443 ax-bndl 1444 ax-4 1445 ax-17 1464 ax-i9 1468 ax-ial 1472 ax-i5r 1473 ax-ext 2070 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 115 df-nf 1395 df-sb 1693 df-clab 2075 df-cleq 2081 df-clel 2084 df-nfc 2217 df-ral 2364 df-rab 2368 df-in 3005 df-ss 3012 |
This theorem is referenced by: rabssdv 3101 dvdsssfz1 11131 phibndlem 11470 dfphi2 11474 istopon 11610 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |