Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > rabss | GIF version |
Description: Restricted class abstraction in a subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-2006.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rabss | ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | df-rab 2402 | . . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
2 | 1 | sseq1i 3093 | . 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ 𝐵) |
3 | abss 3136 | . 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) | |
4 | impexp 261 | . . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))) | |
5 | 4 | albii 1431 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))) |
6 | df-ral 2398 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))) | |
7 | 5, 6 | bitr4i 186 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) |
8 | 2, 3, 7 | 3bitri 205 | 1 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 103 ↔ wb 104 ∀wal 1314 ∈ wcel 1465 {cab 2103 ∀wral 2393 {crab 2397 ⊆ wss 3041 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-io 683 ax-5 1408 ax-7 1409 ax-gen 1410 ax-ie1 1454 ax-ie2 1455 ax-8 1467 ax-10 1468 ax-11 1469 ax-i12 1470 ax-bndl 1471 ax-4 1472 ax-17 1491 ax-i9 1495 ax-ial 1499 ax-i5r 1500 ax-ext 2099 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-nf 1422 df-sb 1721 df-clab 2104 df-cleq 2110 df-clel 2113 df-nfc 2247 df-ral 2398 df-rab 2402 df-in 3047 df-ss 3054 |
This theorem is referenced by: rabssdv 3147 dvdsssfz1 11477 phibndlem 11819 dfphi2 11823 istopon 12107 blsscls2 12589 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |