ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  symdifxor GIF version

Theorem symdifxor 3429
Description: Expressing symmetric difference with exclusive-or or two differences. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Jul-2018.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
symdifxor ((𝐴𝐵) ∪ (𝐵𝐴)) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐵)}
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵

Proof of Theorem symdifxor
StepHypRef Expression
1 eldif 3166 . . . 4 (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ↔ (𝑥𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐵))
2 eldif 3166 . . . 4 (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵𝐴) ↔ (𝑥𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐴))
31, 2orbi12i 765 . . 3 ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵𝐴)) ↔ ((𝑥𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐵) ∨ (𝑥𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐴)))
4 elun 3304 . . 3 (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴𝐵) ∪ (𝐵𝐴)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵𝐴)))
5 excxor 1389 . . . 4 ((𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐵) ↔ ((𝑥𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐵) ∨ (¬ 𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐵)))
6 ancom 266 . . . . 5 ((¬ 𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐵) ↔ (𝑥𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐴))
76orbi2i 763 . . . 4 (((𝑥𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐵) ∨ (¬ 𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐵)) ↔ ((𝑥𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐵) ∨ (𝑥𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐴)))
85, 7bitri 184 . . 3 ((𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐵) ↔ ((𝑥𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐵) ∨ (𝑥𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐴)))
93, 4, 83bitr4i 212 . 2 (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴𝐵) ∪ (𝐵𝐴)) ↔ (𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐵))
109abbi2i 2311 1 ((𝐴𝐵) ∪ (𝐵𝐴)) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐵)}
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3  wa 104  wo 709   = wceq 1364  wxo 1386  wcel 2167  {cab 2182  cdif 3154  cun 3155
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-io 710  ax-5 1461  ax-7 1462  ax-gen 1463  ax-ie1 1507  ax-ie2 1508  ax-8 1518  ax-10 1519  ax-11 1520  ax-i12 1521  ax-bndl 1523  ax-4 1524  ax-17 1540  ax-i9 1544  ax-ial 1548  ax-i5r 1549  ax-ext 2178
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1367  df-xor 1387  df-nf 1475  df-sb 1777  df-clab 2183  df-cleq 2189  df-clel 2192  df-nfc 2328  df-v 2765  df-dif 3159  df-un 3161
This theorem is referenced by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator