ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  unab GIF version

Theorem unab 3267
Description: Union of two class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 29-Sep-2002.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
unab ({𝑥𝜑} ∪ {𝑥𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑𝜓)}

Proof of Theorem unab
Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 sbor 1877 . . 3 ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
2 df-clab 2076 . . 3 (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑𝜓)} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑𝜓))
3 df-clab 2076 . . . 4 (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥𝜑} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
4 df-clab 2076 . . . 4 (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥𝜓} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)
53, 4orbi12i 717 . . 3 ((𝑦 ∈ {𝑥𝜑} ∨ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥𝜓}) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
61, 2, 53bitr4ri 212 . 2 ((𝑦 ∈ {𝑥𝜑} ∨ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥𝜓}) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑𝜓)})
76uneqri 3143 1 ({𝑥𝜑} ∪ {𝑥𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑𝜓)}
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  wo 665   = wceq 1290  wcel 1439  [wsb 1693  {cab 2075  cun 2998
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 666  ax-5 1382  ax-7 1383  ax-gen 1384  ax-ie1 1428  ax-ie2 1429  ax-8 1441  ax-10 1442  ax-11 1443  ax-i12 1444  ax-bndl 1445  ax-4 1446  ax-17 1465  ax-i9 1469  ax-ial 1473  ax-i5r 1474  ax-ext 2071
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1293  df-nf 1396  df-sb 1694  df-clab 2076  df-cleq 2082  df-clel 2085  df-nfc 2218  df-v 2622  df-un 3004
This theorem is referenced by:  unrab  3271  rabun2  3279  dfif6  3399  unopab  3923  dmun  4656  frecabex  6177
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator