![]() |
Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > unab | GIF version |
Description: Union of two class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 29-Sep-2002.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
unab | ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)} |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | sbor 1966 | . . 3 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)) | |
2 | df-clab 2176 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)) | |
3 | df-clab 2176 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) | |
4 | df-clab 2176 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓) | |
5 | 3, 4 | orbi12i 765 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∨ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)) |
6 | 1, 2, 5 | 3bitr4ri 213 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∨ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)}) |
7 | 6 | uneqri 3292 | 1 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)} |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: ∨ wo 709 = wceq 1364 [wsb 1773 ∈ wcel 2160 {cab 2175 ∪ cun 3142 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-io 710 ax-5 1458 ax-7 1459 ax-gen 1460 ax-ie1 1504 ax-ie2 1505 ax-8 1515 ax-10 1516 ax-11 1517 ax-i12 1518 ax-bndl 1520 ax-4 1521 ax-17 1537 ax-i9 1541 ax-ial 1545 ax-i5r 1546 ax-ext 2171 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-tru 1367 df-nf 1472 df-sb 1774 df-clab 2176 df-cleq 2182 df-clel 2185 df-nfc 2321 df-v 2754 df-un 3148 |
This theorem is referenced by: unrab 3421 rabun2 3429 dfif6 3551 unopab 4100 dmun 4855 frecabex 6427 fngsum 12875 igsumvalx 12876 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |