| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > unab | GIF version | ||
| Description: Union of two class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 29-Sep-2002.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| unab | ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)} |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | sbor 2007 | . . 3 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)) | |
| 2 | df-clab 2218 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)) | |
| 3 | df-clab 2218 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) | |
| 4 | df-clab 2218 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓) | |
| 5 | 3, 4 | orbi12i 771 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∨ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)) |
| 6 | 1, 2, 5 | 3bitr4ri 213 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∨ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)}) |
| 7 | 6 | uneqri 3349 | 1 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)} |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: ∨ wo 715 = wceq 1397 [wsb 1810 ∈ wcel 2202 {cab 2217 ∪ cun 3198 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-io 716 ax-5 1495 ax-7 1496 ax-gen 1497 ax-ie1 1541 ax-ie2 1542 ax-8 1552 ax-10 1553 ax-11 1554 ax-i12 1555 ax-bndl 1557 ax-4 1558 ax-17 1574 ax-i9 1578 ax-ial 1582 ax-i5r 1583 ax-ext 2213 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-tru 1400 df-nf 1509 df-sb 1811 df-clab 2218 df-cleq 2224 df-clel 2227 df-nfc 2363 df-v 2804 df-un 3204 |
| This theorem is referenced by: unrab 3478 rabun2 3486 dfif6 3607 unopab 4168 dmun 4938 frecabex 6564 fngsum 13473 igsumvalx 13474 vtxdfifiun 16151 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |