Theorem axprALT 5369

Description: Alternate proof of axpr 5374. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
axprALT	⊢ ∃𝑧∀𝑤((𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑧,𝑤   𝑦,𝑧,𝑤

Proof of Theorem axprALT

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		zfpair 5368	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ V
2	1	isseti 3460	. 2 ⊢ ∃𝑧 𝑧 = {𝑥, 𝑦}
3		dfcleq 2730	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = {𝑥, 𝑦} ↔ ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ {𝑥, 𝑦}))
4		vex 3446	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑤 ∈ V
5	4	elpr 4607	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ {𝑥, 𝑦} ↔ (𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦))
6	5	bibi2i 337	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ {𝑥, 𝑦}) ↔ (𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦)))
7		biimpr 220	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦)) → ((𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧))
8	6, 7	sylbi 217	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ {𝑥, 𝑦}) → ((𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧))
9	8	alimi 1813	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ {𝑥, 𝑦}) → ∀𝑤((𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧))
10	3, 9	sylbi 217	. 2 ⊢ (𝑧 = {𝑥, 𝑦} → ∀𝑤((𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧))
11	2, 10	eximii 1839	1 ⊢ ∃𝑧∀𝑤((𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∨ wo 848  ∀wal 1540   = wceq 1542  ∃wex 1781   ∈ wcel 2114  {cpr 4584

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2185  ax-ext 2709  ax-rep 5226  ax-sep 5243  ax-nul 5253  ax-pow 5312

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2812  df-nfc 2886  df-ne 2934  df-v 3444  df-dif 3906  df-un 3908  df-ss 3920  df-nul 4288  df-pw 4558  df-sn 4583  df-pr 4585

This theorem is referenced by: (None)