Theorem axprALT 5398

Description: Alternate proof of axpr 5403. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
axprALT	⊢ ∃𝑧∀𝑤((𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑧,𝑤   𝑦,𝑧,𝑤

Proof of Theorem axprALT

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		zfpair 5397	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ V
2	1	isseti 3476	. 2 ⊢ ∃𝑧 𝑧 = {𝑥, 𝑦}
3		dfcleq 2759	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = {𝑥, 𝑦} ↔ ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ {𝑥, 𝑦}))
4		vex 3462	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑤 ∈ V
5	4	elpr 4619	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ {𝑥, 𝑦} ↔ (𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦))
6	5	bibi2i 340	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ {𝑥, 𝑦}) ↔ (𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦)))
7		biimpr 223	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦)) → ((𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧))
8	6, 7	sylbi 220	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ {𝑥, 𝑦}) → ((𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧))
9	8	alimi 1844	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ {𝑥, 𝑦}) → ∀𝑤((𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧))
10	3, 9	sylbi 220	. 2 ⊢ (𝑧 = {𝑥, 𝑦} → ∀𝑤((𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧))
11	2, 10	eximii 1870	1 ⊢ ∃𝑧∀𝑤((𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∨ wo 861  ∀wal 1568   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2146  {cpr 4596

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2738  ax-rep 5243  ax-sep 5262  ax-nul 5274  ax-pow 5341

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2745  df-cleq 2758  df-clel 2841  df-nfc 2915  df-ne 2962  df-v 3460  df-dif 3911  df-un 3913  df-ss 3925  df-nul 4290  df-pw 4569  df-sn 4595  df-pr 4597

This theorem is used by: (None)