MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  axregndlem1 Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem axregndlem1 10694
Description: Lemma for the Axiom of Regularity with no distinct variable conditions. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2401. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
axregndlem1 (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))))

Proof of Theorem axregndlem1
StepHypRef Expression
1 19.8a 2217 . 2 (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦)
2 nfae 2462 . . 3 Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧
3 nfae 2462 . . . . . 6 Ⅎ𝑧∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧
4 elirrv 9598 . . . . . . . . 9 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑥
5 elequ1 2151 . . . . . . . . 9 (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))
64, 5mtbii 329 . . . . . . . 8 (𝑥 = 𝑧 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)
76sps 2221 . . . . . . 7 (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)
87pm2.21d 122 . . . . . 6 (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))
93, 8alrimi 2249 . . . . 5 (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))
109anim2i 629 . . . 4 ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦)))
1110expcom 419 . . 3 (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))))
122, 11eximd 2252 . 2 (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧 → (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))))
131, 12syl5 35 1 (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))))
Colors of variables:    wff setvar class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401  ∀wal 1567  ∃wex 1811
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2212  ax-13 2401  ax-sep 5248  ax-reg 9593
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-tru 1572  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816
This theorem is used by:  axregndlem2  10695  axregnd  10696
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator