Theorem axregndlem1 10013

Description: Lemma for the Axiom of Regularity with no distinct variable conditions. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2379. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
axregndlem1	⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))))

Proof of Theorem axregndlem1

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		19.8a 2178	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦)
2		nfae 2444	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧
3		nfae 2444	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧
4		elirrv 9044	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑥
5		elequ1 2118	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))
6	4, 5	mtbii 329	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)
7	6	sps 2182	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)
8	7	pm2.21d 121	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))
9	3, 8	alrimi 2211	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))
10	9	anim2i 619	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦)))
11	10	expcom 417	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))))
12	2, 11	eximd 2214	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧 → (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))))
13	1, 12	syl5 34	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 399  ∀wal 1536  ∃wex 1781

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2175  ax-13 2379  ax-ext 2770  ax-sep 5167  ax-nul 5174  ax-pr 5295  ax-reg 9040

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-or 845  df-tru 1541  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2070  df-clab 2777  df-cleq 2791  df-clel 2870  df-ral 3111  df-rex 3112  df-v 3443  df-dif 3884  df-un 3886  df-nul 4244  df-sn 4526  df-pr 4528

This theorem is referenced by:  axregndlem2  10014  axregnd  10015