Theorem axregndlem1 9626

Description: Lemma for the Axiom of Regularity with no distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2002.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
axregndlem1	⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))))

Proof of Theorem axregndlem1

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		19.8a 2206	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦)
2		nfae 2468	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧
3		nfae 2468	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧
4		elirrv 8657	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑥
5		elequ1 2152	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))
6	4, 5	mtbii 315	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)
7	6	sps 2209	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)
8	7	pm2.21d 119	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))
9	3, 8	alrimi 2238	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))
10	9	anim2i 595	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦)))
11	10	expcom 398	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))))
12	2, 11	eximd 2241	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧 → (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))))
13	1, 12	syl5 34	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 382  ∀wal 1629  ∃wex 1852

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1870  ax-4 1885  ax-5 1991  ax-6 2057  ax-7 2093  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2174  ax-11 2190  ax-12 2203  ax-13 2408  ax-ext 2751  ax-sep 4915  ax-nul 4923  ax-pr 5034  ax-reg 8653

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-an 383  df-or 827  df-tru 1634  df-ex 1853  df-nf 1858  df-sb 2050  df-clab 2758  df-cleq 2764  df-clel 2767  df-nfc 2902  df-ral 3066  df-rex 3067  df-v 3353  df-dif 3726  df-un 3728  df-nul 4064  df-sn 4317  df-pr 4319

This theorem is referenced by:  axregndlem2  9627  axregnd  9628