Theorem brabidga 39449

Description: The law of concretion for a binary relation. Special case of brabga 5512. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404, see brabidgaw 39448 for a weaker version that does not require it. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Nov-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
brabidga.1	⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
brabidga	⊢ (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝜑)

Proof of Theorem brabidga

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		brabidga.1	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
2	1	breqi 5112	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑥{⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}𝑦)
3		df-br 5107	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥{⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}𝑦 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑})
4		opabid 5503	. 2 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑)
5	2, 3, 4	3bitri 300	1 ⊢ (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝜑)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ↔ wb 209   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2146  ⟨cop 4838   class class class wbr 5106  {copab 5170

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1944  ax-6 2001  ax-7 2042  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-12 2215  ax-13 2404  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5252  ax-pr 5395

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2101  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-br 5107  df-opab 5171

This theorem is used by: (None)