Theorem brabidgaw 38711

Description: The law of concretion for a binary relation. Special case of brabga 5483. Version of brabidga 38712 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2377. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Nov-2018.) (Revised by GG, 2-Apr-2024.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
brabidgaw.1	⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
brabidgaw	⊢ (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝜑)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝑅(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem brabidgaw

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		brabidgaw.1	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
2	1	breqi 5092	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑥{⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}𝑦)
3		df-br 5087	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥{⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}𝑦 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑})
4		opabidw 5473	. 2 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑)
5	2, 3, 4	3bitri 297	1 ⊢ (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝜑)

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 206   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2114  ⟨cop 4574   class class class wbr 5086  {copab 5148

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-12 2185  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5232  ax-pr 5371

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2570  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2812  df-rab 3391  df-v 3432  df-dif 3893  df-un 3895  df-in 3897  df-ss 3907  df-nul 4275  df-if 4468  df-sn 4569  df-pr 4571  df-op 4575  df-br 5087  df-opab 5149

This theorem is referenced by:  inxpxrn  38756