Theorem brabidgaw 38366

Description: The law of concretion for a binary relation. Special case of brabga 5539. Version of brabidga 38367 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2377. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Nov-2018.) (Revised by GG, 2-Apr-2024.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
brabidgaw.1	⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
brabidgaw	⊢ (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝜑)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝑅(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem brabidgaw

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		brabidgaw.1	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
2	1	breqi 5149	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑥{⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}𝑦)
3		df-br 5144	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥{⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}𝑦 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑})
4		opabidw 5529	. 2 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑)
5	2, 3, 4	3bitri 297	1 ⊢ (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝜑)

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 206   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2108  ⟨cop 4632   class class class wbr 5143  {copab 5205

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2141  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2708  ax-sep 5296  ax-nul 5306  ax-pr 5432

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2065  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2816  df-rab 3437  df-v 3482  df-dif 3954  df-un 3956  df-ss 3968  df-nul 4334  df-if 4526  df-sn 4627  df-pr 4629  df-op 4633  df-br 5144  df-opab 5206

This theorem is referenced by:  inxpxrn  38396