Theorem dalemkeop 39569

Description: Lemma for dath 39680. Frequently-used utility lemma. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2012.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
dalema.ph	⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (Base‘𝐾)) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (𝑌 ∈ 𝑂 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑂) ∧ ((¬ 𝐶 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃)) ∧ (¬ 𝐶 ≤ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ≤ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ≤ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆)) ∧ (𝐶 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝐶 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇) ∧ 𝐶 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈)))))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dalemkeop	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ OP)

Proof of Theorem dalemkeop

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dalema.ph	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (Base‘𝐾)) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (𝑌 ∈ 𝑂 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑂) ∧ ((¬ 𝐶 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃)) ∧ (¬ 𝐶 ≤ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ≤ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ≤ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆)) ∧ (𝐶 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝐶 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇) ∧ 𝐶 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈)))))
2	1	dalemkehl 39567	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ HL)
3		hlop 39305	. 2 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → 𝐾 ∈ OP)
4	2, 3	syl 17	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ OP)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1085   ∈ wcel 2104   class class class wbr 5149  ‘cfv 6558  (class class class)co 7425  Basecbs 17234  OPcops 39115  HLchlt 39293

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1790  ax-4 1804  ax-5 1906  ax-6 1963  ax-7 2003  ax-8 2106  ax-9 2114  ax-ext 2704

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1538  df-fal 1548  df-ex 1775  df-sb 2061  df-clab 2711  df-cleq 2725  df-clel 2812  df-ral 3058  df-rex 3067  df-rab 3433  df-v 3479  df-dif 3966  df-un 3968  df-in 3970  df-ss 3980  df-nul 4340  df-if 4531  df-sn 4631  df-pr 4633  df-op 4637  df-uni 4915  df-br 5150  df-iota 6510  df-fv 6566  df-ov 7428  df-ol 39121  df-oml 39122  df-hlat 39294

This theorem is referenced by:  dalemcea  39604