Theorem dalemkeop 39574

Description: Lemma for dath 39685. Frequently-used utility lemma. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2012.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
dalema.ph	⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (Base‘𝐾)) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (𝑌 ∈ 𝑂 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑂) ∧ ((¬ 𝐶 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃)) ∧ (¬ 𝐶 ≤ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ≤ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ≤ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆)) ∧ (𝐶 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝐶 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇) ∧ 𝐶 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈)))))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dalemkeop	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ OP)

Proof of Theorem dalemkeop

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dalema.ph	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (Base‘𝐾)) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (𝑌 ∈ 𝑂 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑂) ∧ ((¬ 𝐶 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃)) ∧ (¬ 𝐶 ≤ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ≤ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ≤ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆)) ∧ (𝐶 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝐶 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇) ∧ 𝐶 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈)))))
2	1	dalemkehl 39572	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ HL)
3		hlop 39310	. 2 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → 𝐾 ∈ OP)
4	2, 3	syl 17	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ OP)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1087   ∈ wcel 2108   class class class wbr 5166  ‘cfv 6568  (class class class)co 7443  Basecbs 17252  OPcops 39120  HLchlt 39298

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-ext 2711

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1778  df-sb 2065  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2819  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3077  df-rab 3444  df-v 3490  df-dif 3979  df-un 3981  df-in 3983  df-ss 3993  df-nul 4353  df-if 4549  df-sn 4649  df-pr 4651  df-op 4655  df-uni 4932  df-br 5167  df-iota 6520  df-fv 6576  df-ov 7446  df-ol 39126  df-oml 39127  df-hlat 39299

This theorem is referenced by:  dalemcea  39609