Theorem dffr2 5661

Description: Alternate definition of well-founded relation. Similar to Definition 6.21 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2015.) Avoid ax-10 2141, ax-11 2158, ax-12 2178, but use ax-8 2110. (Revised by GG, 3-Oct-2024.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dffr2	⊢ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 {𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ 𝑧𝑅𝑦} = ∅))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐴   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦,𝑧

Proof of Theorem dffr2

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-fr 5652	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑤𝑅𝑦))
2		breq1 5169	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑤 → (𝑧𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑤𝑅𝑦))
3	2	rabeq0w 4410	. . . . 5 ⊢ ({𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ 𝑧𝑅𝑦} = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑤𝑅𝑦)
4	3	rexbii 3100	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 {𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ 𝑧𝑅𝑦} = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑤𝑅𝑦)
5	4	imbi2i 336	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 {𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ 𝑧𝑅𝑦} = ∅) ↔ ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑤𝑅𝑦))
6	5	albii 1817	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 {𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ 𝑧𝑅𝑦} = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑤𝑅𝑦))
7	1, 6	bitr4i 278	1 ⊢ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 {𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ 𝑧𝑅𝑦} = ∅))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1535   = wceq 1537   ≠ wne 2946  ∀wral 3067  ∃wrex 3076  {crab 3443   ⊆ wss 3976  ∅c0 4352   class class class wbr 5166   Fr wfr 5649

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-ext 2711

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1778  df-sb 2065  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2819  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3077  df-rab 3444  df-v 3490  df-dif 3979  df-un 3981  df-ss 3993  df-nul 4353  df-if 4549  df-sn 4649  df-pr 4651  df-op 4655  df-br 5167  df-fr 5652

This theorem is referenced by:  fr0  5678  dfepfr  5684  dffr3  6129