Theorem dffr2 5544

Description: Alternate definition of well-founded relation. Similar to Definition 6.21 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2015.) Avoid ax-10 2139, ax-11 2156, ax-12 2173, but use ax-8 2110. (Revised by Gino Giotto, 3-Oct-2024.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dffr2	⊢ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 {𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ 𝑧𝑅𝑦} = ∅))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐴   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦,𝑧

Proof of Theorem dffr2

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-fr 5535	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑤𝑅𝑦))
2		breq1 5073	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑤 → (𝑧𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑤𝑅𝑦))
3	2	rabeq0w 4314	. . . . 5 ⊢ ({𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ 𝑧𝑅𝑦} = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑤𝑅𝑦)
4	3	rexbii 3177	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 {𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ 𝑧𝑅𝑦} = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑤𝑅𝑦)
5	4	imbi2i 335	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 {𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ 𝑧𝑅𝑦} = ∅) ↔ ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑤𝑅𝑦))
6	5	albii 1823	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 {𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ 𝑧𝑅𝑦} = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑤𝑅𝑦))
7	1, 6	bitr4i 277	1 ⊢ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 {𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ 𝑧𝑅𝑦} = ∅))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1537   = wceq 1539   ≠ wne 2942  ∀wral 3063  ∃wrex 3064  {crab 3067   ⊆ wss 3883  ∅c0 4253   class class class wbr 5070   Fr wfr 5532

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-ext 2709

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 844  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1784  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2817  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3069  df-rab 3072  df-v 3424  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-nul 4254  df-if 4457  df-sn 4559  df-pr 4561  df-op 4565  df-br 5071  df-fr 5535

This theorem is referenced by:  fr0  5559  dfepfr  5565  dffr3  5996