![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > dffr2 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Alternate definition of well-founded relation. Similar to Definition 6.21 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2015.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
dffr2 | ⊢ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 {𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ 𝑧𝑅𝑦} = ∅)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | df-fr 5478 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦)) | |
2 | rabeq0 4292 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ({𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ 𝑧𝑅𝑦} = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦) | |
3 | 2 | rexbii 3210 | . . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 {𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ 𝑧𝑅𝑦} = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦) |
4 | 3 | imbi2i 339 | . . 3 ⊢ (((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 {𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ 𝑧𝑅𝑦} = ∅) ↔ ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦)) |
5 | 4 | albii 1821 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 {𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ 𝑧𝑅𝑦} = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦)) |
6 | 1, 5 | bitr4i 281 | 1 ⊢ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 {𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ 𝑧𝑅𝑦} = ∅)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 399 ∀wal 1536 = wceq 1538 ≠ wne 2987 ∀wral 3106 ∃wrex 3107 {crab 3110 ⊆ wss 3881 ∅c0 4243 class class class wbr 5030 Fr wfr 5475 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1797 ax-4 1811 ax-5 1911 ax-6 1970 ax-7 2015 ax-8 2113 ax-9 2121 ax-10 2142 ax-11 2158 ax-12 2175 ax-ext 2770 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 400 df-or 845 df-tru 1541 df-ex 1782 df-nf 1786 df-sb 2070 df-clab 2777 df-cleq 2791 df-clel 2870 df-nfc 2938 df-ral 3111 df-rex 3112 df-rab 3115 df-dif 3884 df-nul 4244 df-fr 5478 |
This theorem is referenced by: fr0 5498 dfepfr 5504 dffr3 5929 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |