Theorem dffr2 5639

Description: Alternate definition of well-founded relation. Similar to Definition 6.21 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2015.) Avoid ax-10 2137, ax-11 2154, ax-12 2171, but use ax-8 2108. (Revised by Gino Giotto, 3-Oct-2024.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dffr2	⊢ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 {𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ 𝑧𝑅𝑦} = ∅))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐴   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦,𝑧

Proof of Theorem dffr2

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-fr 5630	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑤𝑅𝑦))
2		breq1 5150	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑤 → (𝑧𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑤𝑅𝑦))
3	2	rabeq0w 4382	. . . . 5 ⊢ ({𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ 𝑧𝑅𝑦} = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑤𝑅𝑦)
4	3	rexbii 3094	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 {𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ 𝑧𝑅𝑦} = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑤𝑅𝑦)
5	4	imbi2i 335	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 {𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ 𝑧𝑅𝑦} = ∅) ↔ ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑤𝑅𝑦))
6	5	albii 1821	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 {𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ 𝑧𝑅𝑦} = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑤𝑅𝑦))
7	1, 6	bitr4i 277	1 ⊢ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 {𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ 𝑧𝑅𝑦} = ∅))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 396  ∀wal 1539   = wceq 1541   ≠ wne 2940  ∀wral 3061  ∃wrex 3070  {crab 3432   ⊆ wss 3947  ∅c0 4321   class class class wbr 5147   Fr wfr 5627

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-ext 2703

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 846  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1782  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2710  df-cleq 2724  df-clel 2810  df-ral 3062  df-rex 3071  df-rab 3433  df-v 3476  df-dif 3950  df-un 3952  df-in 3954  df-ss 3964  df-nul 4322  df-if 4528  df-sn 4628  df-pr 4630  df-op 4634  df-br 5148  df-fr 5630

This theorem is referenced by:  fr0  5654  dfepfr  5660  dffr3  6095