P. 439 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 43801-43900   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	mhmcopsr 43801	The composition of a monoid homomorphism and a power series is a power series. (Contributed by SN, 18-May-2025.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐼 mPwSer 𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝐼 mPwSer 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑄)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (𝑅 MndHom 𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻 ∘ 𝐹) ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	mhmcoaddpsr 43802	Show that the ring homomorphism in rhmpsr 43804 preserves addition. (Contributed by SN, 18-May-2025.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐼 mPwSer 𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝐼 mPwSer 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑄)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑄)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (𝑅 MndHom 𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻 ∘ (𝐹 + 𝐺)) = ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹) + (𝐻 ∘ 𝐺)))
Theorem	rhmcomulpsr 43803	Show that the ring homomorphism in rhmpsr 43804 preserves multiplication. (Contributed by SN, 18-May-2025.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐼 mPwSer 𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝐼 mPwSer 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑄)    &   ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ ∙ = (.r‘𝑄)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (𝑅 RingHom 𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻 ∘ (𝐹 · 𝐺)) = ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹) ∙ (𝐻 ∘ 𝐺)))
Theorem	rhmpsr 43804*	Provide a ring homomorphism between two power series algebras over their respective base rings given a ring homomorphism between the two base rings. (Contributed by SN, 8-Feb-2025.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐼 mPwSer 𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝐼 mPwSer 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑝 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝐻 ∘ 𝑝))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (𝑅 RingHom 𝑆))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑃 RingHom 𝑄))
Theorem	rhmpsr1 43805*	Provide a ring homomorphism between two univariate power series algebras over their respective base rings given a ring homomorphism between the two base rings. (Contributed by SN, 8-Feb-2025.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (PwSer1‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (PwSer1‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑝 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝐻 ∘ 𝑝))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (𝑅 RingHom 𝑆))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑃 RingHom 𝑄))
Theorem	evl0 43806	The zero polynomial evaluates to zero. (Contributed by SN, 23-Nov-2024.)
⊢ 𝑄 = (𝐼 eval 𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (0g‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑄‘ 0 ) = ((𝐵 ↑m 𝐼) × {𝑂}))
Theorem	evlsbagval 43807*	Polynomial evaluation builder for a bag of variables. EDITORIAL: This theorem should stay in my mathbox until there's another use, since 0 and 1 using 𝑈 instead of 𝑆 may not be convenient. (Contributed by SN, 29-Jul-2024.)
⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐼 evalSub 𝑆)‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑆 ↾s 𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (mulGrp‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {ℎ ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m 𝐼) ∣ (◡ℎ “ ℕ) ∈ Fin}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑠 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ if(𝑠 = 𝐵, 1 , 0 ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ CRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐾 ↑m 𝐼))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ ((𝑄‘𝐹)‘𝐴) = (𝑀 Σg (𝑣 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ ((𝐵‘𝑣) ↑ (𝐴‘𝑣))))))
Theorem	evlvvvallem 43808*	Lemma for theorems using evlvvval 22472. Version of evlsvvvallem2 22431 using df-evl 22414. (Contributed by SN, 11-Mar-2025.)
⊢ 𝐷 = {ℎ ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m 𝐼) ∣ (◡ℎ “ ℕ) ∈ Fin}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (mulGrp‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐾 ↑m 𝐼))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑏 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑏) · (𝑀 Σg (𝑣 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ ((𝑏‘𝑣) ↑ (𝐴‘𝑣)))))) finSupp (0g‘𝑅))
Theorem	evlselvlem 43809*	Lemma for evlselv 43810. Used to re-index to and from bags of variables in 𝐼 and bags of variables in the subsets 𝐽 and 𝐼 ∖ 𝐽. (Contributed by SN, 10-Mar-2025.)
⊢ 𝐷 = {ℎ ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m 𝐼) ∣ (◡ℎ “ ℕ) ∈ Fin}    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = {𝑔 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m 𝐽) ∣ (◡𝑔 “ ℕ) ∈ Fin}    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (𝐼 ∖ 𝐽)) ∣ (◡𝑓 “ ℕ) ∈ Fin}    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑐 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 ↦ (𝑐 ∪ 𝑒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ⊆ 𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:(𝐶 × 𝐸)⟶1-1onto𝐷)
Theorem	evlselv 43810	Evaluating a selection of variable assignments, then evaluating the rest of the variables, is the same as evaluating with all assignments. (Contributed by SN, 10-Mar-2025.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝐼 ∖ 𝐽) mPoly 𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐽 mPoly 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (algSc‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ⊆ 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐾 ↑m 𝐼))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((((𝐼 ∖ 𝐽) eval 𝑅)‘(((𝐽 eval 𝑈)‘(((𝐼 selectVars 𝑅)‘𝐽)‘𝐹))‘(𝐿 ∘ (𝐴 ↾ 𝐽))))‘(𝐴 ↾ (𝐼 ∖ 𝐽))) = (((𝐼 eval 𝑅)‘𝐹)‘𝐴))
Theorem	fsuppind 43811*	Induction on functions 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 with finite support, or in other words the base set of the free module (see frlmelbas 22092 and frlmplusgval 22100). This theorem is structurally general for polynomial proof usage (see mplelbas 22328 and mpladd 22346). Note that hypothesis 0 is redundant when 𝐼 is nonempty. (Contributed by SN, 18-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Grp)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼 × { 0 }) ∈ 𝐻)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ if(𝑥 = 𝑎, 𝑏, 0 )) ∈ 𝐻)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐻)) → (𝑥 ∘f + 𝑦) ∈ 𝐻)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑋:𝐼⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 finSupp 0 )) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐻)
Theorem	fsuppssindlem1 43812*	Lemma for fsuppssind 43814. Functions are zero outside of their support. (Contributed by SN, 15-Jul-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐼⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 supp 0 ) ⊆ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ 𝑆, ((𝐹 ↾ 𝑆)‘𝑥), 0 )))
Theorem	fsuppssindlem2 43813*	Lemma for fsuppssind 43814. Write a function as a union. (Contributed by SN, 15-Jul-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ {𝑓 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝑆) ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ 𝑆, (𝑓‘𝑥), 0 )) ∈ 𝐻} ↔ (𝐹:𝑆⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝐹 ∪ ((𝐼 ∖ 𝑆) × { 0 })) ∈ 𝐻)))
Theorem	fsuppssind 43814*	Induction on functions 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 with finite support (see fsuppind 43811) whose supports are subsets of 𝑆. (Contributed by SN, 15-Jun-2024.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Grp)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼 × { 0 }) ∈ 𝐻)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑠 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ if(𝑠 = 𝑎, 𝑏, 0 )) ∈ 𝐻)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐻)) → (𝑥 ∘f + 𝑦) ∈ 𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋:𝐼⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 finSupp 0 )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 supp 0 ) ⊆ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐻)
Theorem	mhpind 43815*	The homogeneous polynomials of degree 𝑁 are generated by the terms of degree 𝑁 and addition. (Contributed by SN, 28-Jul-2024.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐼 mHomP 𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑅)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {ℎ ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m 𝐼) ∣ (◡ℎ “ ℕ) ∈ Fin}    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑔 ∈ 𝐷 ∣ ((ℂfld ↾s ℕ0) Σg 𝑔) = 𝑁}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Grp)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐻‘𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐷 × { 0 }) ∈ 𝐺)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑠 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ if(𝑠 = 𝑎, 𝑏, 0 )) ∈ 𝐺)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐻‘𝑁) ∩ 𝐺) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((𝐻‘𝑁) ∩ 𝐺))) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐺)
Theorem	evlsmhpvvval 43816*	Give a formula for the evaluation of a homogeneous polynomial given assignments from variables to values. The difference between this and evlsvvval 22432 is that 𝑏 ∈ 𝐷 is restricted to 𝑏 ∈ 𝐺, that is, we can evaluate an 𝑁-th degree homogeneous polynomial over just the terms where the sum of all variable degrees is 𝑁. (Contributed by SN, 5-Mar-2025.)
⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐼 evalSub 𝑆)‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐼 mHomP 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑆 ↾s 𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {ℎ ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m 𝐼) ∣ (◡ℎ “ ℕ) ∈ Fin}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {𝑔 ∈ 𝐷 ∣ ((ℂfld ↾s ℕ0) Σg 𝑔) = 𝑁}    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (mulGrp‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ CRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐻‘𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐾 ↑m 𝐼))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑄‘𝐹)‘𝐴) = (𝑆 Σg (𝑏 ∈ 𝐺 ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑏) · (𝑀 Σg (𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ ((𝑏‘𝑖) ↑ (𝐴‘𝑖))))))))
Theorem	mhphflem 43817*	Lemma for mhphf 43818. Add several multiples of 𝐿 together, in a case where the total amount of multiplies is 𝑁. (Contributed by SN, 30-Jul-2024.)
⊢ 𝐷 = {ℎ ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m 𝐼) ∣ (◡ℎ “ ℕ) ∈ Fin}    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑔 ∈ 𝐷 ∣ ((ℂfld ↾s ℕ0) Σg 𝑔) = 𝑁}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ · = (.g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Mnd)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ 𝐻) → (𝐺 Σg (𝑣 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ ((𝑎‘𝑣) · 𝐿))) = (𝑁 · 𝐿))
Theorem	mhphf 43818	A homogeneous polynomial defines a homogeneous function. Equivalently, an algebraic form is a homogeneous function. (An algebraic form is the function corresponding to a homogeneous polynomial, which in this case is the (𝑄‘𝑋) which corresponds to 𝑋). (Contributed by SN, 28-Jul-2024.) (Proof shortened by SN, 8-Mar-2025.)
⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐼 evalSub 𝑆)‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐼 mHomP 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑆 ↾s 𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘(mulGrp‘𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ CRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐻‘𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐾 ↑m 𝐼))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑄‘𝑋)‘((𝐼 × {𝐿}) ∘f · 𝐴)) = ((𝑁 ↑ 𝐿) · ((𝑄‘𝑋)‘𝐴)))
Theorem	mhphf2 43819	A homogeneous polynomial defines a homogeneous function; this is mhphf 43818 with simpler notation in the conclusion in exchange for a complex definition of ∙, which is based on frlmvscafval 22102 but without the finite support restriction (frlmpws 22086, frlmbas 22091) on the assignments 𝐴 from variables to values. TODO?: Polynomials (df-mpl 22249) are defined to have a finite amount of terms (of finite degree). As such, any assignment may be replaced by an assignment with finite support (as only a finite amount of variables matter in a given polynomial, even if the set of variables is infinite). So the finite support restriction can be assumed without loss of generality. (Contributed by SN, 11-Nov-2024.)
⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐼 evalSub 𝑆)‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐼 mHomP 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑆 ↾s 𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ ∙ = ( ·𝑠 ‘((ringLMod‘𝑆) ↑s 𝐼))    &   ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘(mulGrp‘𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ CRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐻‘𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐾 ↑m 𝐼))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑄‘𝑋)‘(𝐿 ∙ 𝐴)) = ((𝑁 ↑ 𝐿) · ((𝑄‘𝑋)‘𝐴)))
Theorem	mhphf3 43820	A homogeneous polynomial defines a homogeneous function; this is mhphf2 43819 with the finite support restriction (frlmpws 22086, frlmbas 22091) on the assignments 𝐴 from variables to values. See comment of mhphf2 43819. (Contributed by SN, 23-Nov-2024.)
⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐼 evalSub 𝑆)‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐼 mHomP 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑆 ↾s 𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑆 freeLMod 𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (Base‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ ∙ = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘(mulGrp‘𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ CRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐻‘𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑄‘𝑋)‘(𝐿 ∙ 𝐴)) = ((𝑁 ↑ 𝐿) · ((𝑄‘𝑋)‘𝐴)))
Theorem	mhphf4 43821	A homogeneous polynomial defines a homogeneous function; this is mhphf3 43820 with evalSub collapsed to eval. (Contributed by SN, 23-Nov-2024.)
⊢ 𝑄 = (𝐼 eval 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐼 mHomP 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑆 freeLMod 𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (Base‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ ∙ = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘(mulGrp‘𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ CRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ 𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐻‘𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑄‘𝑋)‘(𝐿 ∙ 𝐴)) = ((𝑁 ↑ 𝐿) · ((𝑄‘𝑋)‘𝐴)))
21.33.7  Projective spaces Looking at a corner in 3D space, one can see three right angles. It is impossible to draw three lines in 2D space such that any two of these lines are perpendicular, but a good enough representation is made by casting lines from the 2D surface. Points along the same cast line are collapsed into one point on the 2D surface. In many cases, the 2D surface is smaller than whatever needs to be represented. If the lines cast were perpendicular to the 2D surface, then only areas as small as the 2D surface could be represented. To fix this, the lines need to get further apart as they go farther from the 2D surface. On the other side of the 2D surface the lines will get closer together and intersect at a point (because it's defined that way). From this perspective, two parallel lines in 3D space will be represented by two lines that seem to intersect at a point "at infinity". Considering all maximal classes of parallel lines on a 2D plane in 3D space, these classes will all appear to intersect at different points at infinity, forming a line at infinity. Therefore the real projective plane can be thought of as the real affine plane together with the line at infinity. The projective plane takes care of some exceptions that may be found in the affine plane. For example, consider the curve that is the zeroes of 𝑦 = 𝑥↑2. Any line connecting the point (0, 1) to the x-axis intersects with the curve twice, except for the vertical line between (0, 1) and (0, 0). In the projective plane, the curve becomes an ellipse and there is no exception. While it may not seem like it, points at infinity and points corresponding to the affine plane are the same type of point. Consider a line going through the origin in 3D (affine) space. Either it intersects the plane 𝑧 = 1 once, or it is entirely within the plane 𝑧 = 0. If it is entirely within the plane 𝑧 = 0, then it corresponds to the point at infinity intersecting all lines on the plane 𝑧 = 1 with the same slope. Else it corresponds to the point in the 2D plane 𝑧 = 1 that it intersects. So there is a bijection between 3D lines through the origin and points on the real projective plane. The concept of a projective space generalizes the projective plane to any dimension (df-prjspn 43836).
Syntax	cprjsp 43822	Extend class notation with the projective space function.
class ℙroj
Definition	df-prjsp 43823*	Define the projective space function. In the bijection between 3D lines through the origin and points in the projective plane (see section comment), this is equivalent to making any two 3D points (excluding the origin) equivalent iff one is a multiple of another. Note that the meaning of "projective space" is more general than the section comment might suggest. In particular, the projective space obtained from ℝ as a ℚ-vector space is infinite-dimensional and is not of the form covered by df-prjspn 43836. Compare df-lsatoms 40225. (Contributed by BJ and SN, 29-Apr-2023.)
⊢ ℙroj = (𝑣 ∈ LVec ↦ ⦋((Base‘𝑣) ∖ {(0g‘𝑣)}) / 𝑏⦌(𝑏 / {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑏) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑣))𝑥 = (𝑙( ·𝑠 ‘𝑣)𝑦))}))
Theorem	prjspval 43824*	Value of the projective space function, which is also known as the projectivization of 𝑉. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 29-Apr-2023.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑉) ∖ {(0g‘𝑉)})    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ LVec → (ℙroj‘𝑉) = (𝐵 / {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝐾 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}))
Theorem	prjsprel 43825*	Utility theorem regarding the relation used in ℙroj. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 29-Apr-2023.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝐾 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∼ 𝑌 ↔ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑚 ∈ 𝐾 𝑋 = (𝑚 · 𝑌)))
Theorem	prjspertr 43826*	The relation in ℙroj is transitive. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 1-May-2023.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝐾 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑉) ∖ {(0g‘𝑉)})    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝑋 ∼ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑌 ∼ 𝑍)) → 𝑋 ∼ 𝑍)
Theorem	prjsperref 43827*	The relation in ℙroj is reflexive. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 30-Apr-2023.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝐾 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑉) ∖ {(0g‘𝑉)})    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ LMod → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑋 ∼ 𝑋))
Theorem	prjspersym 43828*	The relation in ℙroj is symmetric. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 1-May-2023.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝐾 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑉) ∖ {(0g‘𝑉)})    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ LVec ∧ 𝑋 ∼ 𝑌) → 𝑌 ∼ 𝑋)
Theorem	prjsper 43829*	The relation used to define ℙroj is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 1-May-2023.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝐾 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑉) ∖ {(0g‘𝑉)})    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ LVec → ∼ Er 𝐵)
Theorem	prjspreln0 43830*	Two nonzero vectors are equivalent by a nonzero scalar. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 31-May-2023.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝐾 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑉) ∖ {(0g‘𝑉)})    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ LVec → (𝑋 ∼ 𝑌 ↔ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑚 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 })𝑋 = (𝑚 · 𝑌))))
Theorem	prjspvs 43831*	A nonzero multiple of a vector is equivalent to the vector. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 6-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝐾 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑉) ∖ {(0g‘𝑉)})    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ LVec ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 })) → (𝑁 · 𝑋) ∼ 𝑋)
Theorem	prjsprellsp 43832*	Two vectors are equivalent iff their spans are equal. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 31-May-2023.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝐾 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑉) ∖ {(0g‘𝑉)})    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ LVec ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑋 ∼ 𝑌 ↔ (𝑁‘{𝑋}) = (𝑁‘{𝑌})))
Theorem	prjspeclsp 43833*	The vectors equivalent to a vector 𝑋 are the nonzero vectors in the span of 𝑋. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 6-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝐾 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑉) ∖ {(0g‘𝑉)})    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ LVec ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → [𝑋] ∼ = ((𝑁‘{𝑋}) ∖ {(0g‘𝑉)}))
Theorem	prjspval2 43834*	Alternate definition of projective space. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jun-2023.)
⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑉) ∖ { 0 })    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ LVec → (ℙroj‘𝑉) = ∪ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 {((𝑁‘{𝑧}) ∖ { 0 })})
Syntax	cprjspn 43835	Extend class notation with the n-dimensional projective space function.
class ℙrojn
Definition	df-prjspn 43836*	Define the n-dimensional projective space function. A projective space of dimension 1 is a projective line, and a projective space of dimension 2 is a projective plane. Compare df-ehl 25737. This space is considered n-dimensional because the vector space (𝑘 freeLMod (0...𝑛)) is (n+1)-dimensional and the ℙroj function returns equivalence classes with respect to a linear (1-dimensional) relation. (Contributed by BJ and Steven Nguyen, 29-Apr-2023.)
⊢ ℙrojn = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0, 𝑘 ∈ DivRing ↦ (ℙroj‘(𝑘 freeLMod (0...𝑛))))
Theorem	prjspnval 43837	Value of the n-dimensional projective space function. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 1-May-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ DivRing) → (𝑁 ℙrojn 𝐾) = (ℙroj‘(𝐾 freeLMod (0...𝑁))))
Theorem	prjspnerlem 43838*	A lemma showing that the equivalence relation used in prjspnval2 43839 and the equivalence relation used in prjspval 43824 are equal, but only with the antecedent 𝐾 ∈ DivRing. (Contributed by SN, 15-Jul-2023.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)})    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ DivRing → ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑊))𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))})
Theorem	prjspnval2 43839*	Value of the n-dimensional projective space function, expanded. (Contributed by SN, 15-Jul-2023.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)})    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ DivRing)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 ℙrojn 𝐾) = (𝐵 / ∼ ))
Theorem	prjspner 43840*	The relation used to define ℙroj (and indirectly ℙrojn through df-prjspn 43836) is an equivalence relation. This is a lemma that converts the equivalence relation used in results like prjspertr 43826 and prjspersym 43828 (see prjspnerlem 43838). Several theorems are covered in one thanks to the theorems around df-er 8745. (Contributed by SN, 14-Aug-2023.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)})    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ DivRing)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∼ Er 𝐵)
Theorem	prjspnvs 43841*	A nonzero multiple of a vector is equivalent to the vector. This is prjspvs 43831 with the equivalence relation converted by prjspnerlem 43838. (Contributed by SN, 8-Aug-2024.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)})    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ DivRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 0 )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 · 𝑋) ∼ 𝑋)
Theorem	prjspnssbas 43842	A projective space is a set of subsets of the corresponding free module (a set of equivalence classes of nonzero vectors of that module). (Contributed by SN, 17-Jan-2025.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑁 ℙrojn 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ DivRing)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)
Theorem	elprjspnss 43843	A point of a projective space is a subset of the corresponding free module (an equivalence class of nonzero vectors of that module). (Contributed by SN, 23-Sep-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑁 ℙrojn 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ DivRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)
Theorem	prjspnn0 43844	A projective point is nonempty. (Contributed by SN, 17-Jan-2025.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑁 ℙrojn 𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ DivRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	frlmnzcoordex 43845*	Every nonzero vector of a free module has a nonzero coordinate. (Contributed by SN, 23-Sep-2026.)
⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Ring)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑖 ∈ (0...𝑁) ∣ (𝑉‘𝑖) ≠ (0g‘𝐾)} ≠ ∅)
Theorem	frlmnzcoordval 43846*	Value of 𝐽, a function that returns the index of the first nonzero coordinate of 𝑉. (Contributed by SN, 23-Sep-2026.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ inf({𝑖 ∈ (0...𝑁) ∣ (𝑏‘𝑖) ≠ (0g‘𝐾)}, ℝ, < ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽‘𝑉) = inf({𝑖 ∈ (0...𝑁) ∣ (𝑉‘𝑖) ≠ (0g‘𝐾)}, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	frlmnzcoordinf 43847*	The result (𝐽‘𝑉) is the smallest index corresponding to a nonzero coordinate. (Contributed by SN, 23-Sep-2026.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ inf({𝑖 ∈ (0...𝑁) ∣ (𝑏‘𝑖) ≠ (0g‘𝐾)}, ℝ, < ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐼 ∈ {𝑖 ∈ (0...𝑁) ∣ (𝑉‘𝑖) ≠ (0g‘𝐾)}) → (𝐽‘𝑉) ≤ 𝐼)
Theorem	frlmnzcoordcl 43848*	Closure of the first nonzero coordinate function 𝐽. (Contributed by SN, 23-Sep-2026.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ inf({𝑖 ∈ (0...𝑁) ∣ (𝑏‘𝑖) ≠ (0g‘𝐾)}, ℝ, < ))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Ring)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽‘𝑉) ∈ (0...𝑁))
Theorem	frlmnzcoordcl2 43849*	The first nonzero coordinate is a scalar. (Contributed by SN, 24-Sep-2026.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ inf({𝑖 ∈ (0...𝑁) ∣ (𝑏‘𝑖) ≠ (0g‘𝐾)}, ℝ, < ))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Ring)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Base‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑉‘(𝐽‘𝑉)) ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	frlmnzcoordn0 43850*	The function 𝐽 gives a nonzero coordinate. (Contributed by SN, 23-Sep-2026.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ inf({𝑖 ∈ (0...𝑁) ∣ (𝑏‘𝑖) ≠ (0g‘𝐾)}, ℝ, < ))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Ring)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑉‘(𝐽‘𝑉)) ≠ (0g‘𝐾))
Theorem	frlmnzcoordsca 43851*	In a free module, scaling a vector does not change the index of its first nonzero coordinate. (Contributed by SN, 24-Sep-2026.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ inf({𝑖 ∈ (0...𝑁) ∣ (𝑏‘𝑖) ≠ (0g‘𝐾)}, ℝ, < ))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)})    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ DivRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 0 )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽‘(𝐶 · 𝑉)) = (𝐽‘𝑉))
Theorem	prjspnnormval 43852*	Value of 𝐹, a function that 'normalizes' a vector 𝑉 by scaling the first nonzero coordinate to 1. (Contributed by SN, 24-Sep-2026.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ((𝐼‘(𝑣‘(𝐽‘𝑣))) · 𝑣))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑉) = ((𝐼‘(𝑉‘(𝐽‘𝑉))) · 𝑉))
Theorem	prjspnequivnorm 43853*	In a free module, a nonzero vector is equivalent to its normalized vector. (Contributed by SN, 24-Sep-2026.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ inf({𝑖 ∈ (0...𝑁) ∣ (𝑏‘𝑖) ≠ (0g‘𝐾)}, ℝ, < ))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ((𝐼‘(𝑣‘(𝐽‘𝑣))) · 𝑣))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)})    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (invr‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ DivRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∼ (𝐹‘𝑋))
Theorem	prjspnnorm 43854*	In a free module, two nonzero vectors are equivalent iff they have the same normalized representative. (Contributed by SN, 24-Sep-2026.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ inf({𝑖 ∈ (0...𝑁) ∣ (𝑏‘𝑖) ≠ (0g‘𝐾)}, ℝ, < ))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ((𝐼‘(𝑣‘(𝐽‘𝑣))) · 𝑣))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)})    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (invr‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ DivRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∼ 𝑌 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑋) = (𝐹‘𝑌)))
Theorem	0prjspnlem 43855	Lemma for 0prjspn 43857. The given unit vector is a nonzero vector. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 16-Jul-2023.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)})    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...0))    &   ⊢ 1 = ((𝐾 unitVec (0...0))‘0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ DivRing → 1 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	0prjspnrel 43856*	In a zero-dimensional projective space, all vectors are equivalent to the unit vector. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)})    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...0))    &   ⊢ 1 = ((𝐾 unitVec (0...0))‘0)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ DivRing ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑋 ∼ 1 )
Theorem	0prjspn 43857	A zero-dimensional projective space has only 1 point. (Contributed by SN, 9-Jun-2023.)
⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...0))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ DivRing → (0 ℙrojn 𝐾) = {𝐵})
Syntax	cprjcrv 43858	Extend class notation with the projective curve function.
class ℙrojCrv
Definition	df-prjcrv 43859*	Define the projective curve function. This takes a homogeneous polynomial and outputs the homogeneous coordinates where the polynomial evaluates to zero (the "zero set"). (In other words, scalar multiples are collapsed into the same projective point. See mhphf4 43821 and prjspvs 43831). (Contributed by SN, 23-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ℙrojCrv = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0, 𝑘 ∈ Field ↦ (𝑓 ∈ ∪ ran ((0...𝑛) mHomP 𝑘) ↦ {𝑝 ∈ (𝑛 ℙrojn 𝑘) ∣ ((((0...𝑛) eval 𝑘)‘𝑓) “ 𝑝) = {(0g‘𝑘)}}))
Theorem	prjcrvfval 43860*	Value of the projective curve function. (Contributed by SN, 23-Nov-2024.)
⊢ 𝐻 = ((0...𝑁) mHomP 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((0...𝑁) eval 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑁 ℙrojn 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Field)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 ℙrojCrv 𝐾) = (𝑓 ∈ ∪ ran 𝐻 ↦ {𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ ((𝐸‘𝑓) “ 𝑝) = { 0 }}))
Theorem	prjcrvval 43861*	Value of the projective curve function. (Contributed by SN, 23-Nov-2024.)
⊢ 𝐻 = ((0...𝑁) mHomP 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((0...𝑁) eval 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑁 ℙrojn 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ∪ ran 𝐻)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑁 ℙrojCrv 𝐾)‘𝐹) = {𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ ((𝐸‘𝐹) “ 𝑝) = { 0 }})
Theorem	prjcrv0 43862	The "curve" (zero set) corresponding to the zero polynomial contains all coordinates. (Contributed by SN, 23-Nov-2024.)
⊢ 𝑌 = ((0...𝑁) mPoly 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑌)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑁 ℙrojn 𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Field)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑁 ℙrojCrv 𝐾)‘ 0 ) = 𝑃)
21.33.8  Basic reductions for Fermat's Last Theorem
Theorem	dffltz 43863*	Fermat's Last Theorem (FLT) for nonzero integers is equivalent to the original scope of natural numbers. The backwards direction takes (𝑎↑𝑛) + (𝑏↑𝑛) = (𝑐↑𝑛), and adds the negative of any negative term to both sides, thus creating the corresponding equation with only positive integers. There are six combinations of negativity, so the proof is particularly long. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 27-Feb-2023.)
⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3)∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ ∀𝑧 ∈ ℕ ((𝑥↑𝑛) + (𝑦↑𝑛)) ≠ (𝑧↑𝑛) ↔ ∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3)∀𝑎 ∈ (ℤ ∖ {0})∀𝑏 ∈ (ℤ ∖ {0})∀𝑐 ∈ (ℤ ∖ {0})((𝑎↑𝑛) + (𝑏↑𝑛)) ≠ (𝑐↑𝑛))
Theorem	fltmul 43864	A counterexample to FLT stays valid when scaled. The hypotheses are more general than they need to be for convenience. (There does not seem to be a standard term for Fermat or Pythagorean triples extended to any 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0, so the label is more about the context in which this theorem is used). (Contributed by SN, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑𝑁) + (𝐵↑𝑁)) = (𝐶↑𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝑆 · 𝐴)↑𝑁) + ((𝑆 · 𝐵)↑𝑁)) = ((𝑆 · 𝐶)↑𝑁))
Theorem	fltltc 43865	(𝐶↑𝑁) is the largest term and therefore 𝐵 < 𝐶. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 22-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑𝑁) + (𝐵↑𝑁)) = (𝐶↑𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 𝐶)
Theorem	fltnltalem 43866	Lemma for fltnlta 43867. A lower bound for 𝐴 based on pwdif 16066. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 22-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑𝑁) + (𝐵↑𝑁)) = (𝐶↑𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 − 𝐵) · ((𝐶↑(𝑁 − 1)) + ((𝑁 − 1) · (𝐵↑(𝑁 − 1))))) < (𝐴↑𝑁))
Theorem	fltnlta 43867	In a Fermat counterexample, the exponent 𝑁 is less than all three numbers (𝐴, 𝐵, and 𝐶). Note that 𝐴 < 𝐵 (hypothesis) and 𝐵 < 𝐶 (fltltc 43865). See https://youtu.be/EymVXkPWxyc 43865 for an outline. (Contributed by SN, 24-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑𝑁) + (𝐵↑𝑁)) = (𝐶↑𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 < 𝐴)
21.33.9  Exemplar theorems These theorems were added for illustration or pedagogical purposes without the intention of being used, but some may still be moved to main and used, of course.
Theorem	iddii 43868	Version of a1ii 2 with the hypotheses switched. The first hypothesis is redundant so this theorem should not normally appear in a proof. Inference associated with idd 25. (Contributed by SN, 1-Apr-2025.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ 𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜓
Theorem	bicomdALT 43869	Alternate proof of bicomd 226 which is shorter after expanding all parent theorems (as of 8-Aug-2024, bicom 225 depends on bicom1 224 and sylib 221 depends on syl 18). Additionally, the labels bicom1 224 and syl 18 happen to contain fewer characters than bicom 225 and sylib 221. However, neither of these conditions count as a shortening according to conventions 31031. In the first case, the criteria could easily be broken by upstream changes, and in many cases the upstream dependency tree is nontrivial (see orass 935 and pm2.31 936). For the latter case, theorem labels are up to revision, so they are not counted in the size of a proof. (Contributed by SN, 21-May-2022.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	alan 43870	Alias for 19.26 1903 for easier lookup. (Contributed by SN, 12-Aug-2025.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	exor 43871	Alias for 19.43 1917 for easier lookup. (Contributed by SN, 5-Jul-2025.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∃𝑥(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 ∨ ∃𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	rexor 43872	Alias for r19.43 3134 for easier lookup. (Contributed by SN, 5-Jul-2025.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	ruvALT 43873	Alternate proof of ruv 9629 with one fewer syntax step thanks to using elirrv 9618 instead of elirr 9621. However, it does not change the compressed proof size or the number of symbols in the generated display, so it is not considered a shortening according to conventions 31031. (Contributed by SN, 1-Sep-2024.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∉ 𝑥} = V
Theorem	sn-wcdeq 43874	Alternative to wcdeq 3724 and df-cdeq 3725. This flattens the syntax representation ( wi ( weq vx vy ) wph ) to ( sn-wcdeq vx vy wph ), illustrating the comment of df-cdeq 3725. (Contributed by SN, 26-Sep-2024.) (New usage is discouraged.)
wff (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)
Theorem	sq45 43875	45 squared is 2025. (Contributed by SN, 30-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (;45↑2) = ;;;2025
Theorem	sum9cubes 43876	The sum of the first nine perfect cubes is 2025. (Contributed by SN, 30-Mar-2025.)
⊢ Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...9)(𝑘↑3) = ;;;2025
Theorem	sn-isghm 43877*	Longer proof of isghm 19459, unsuccessfully attempting to simplify isghm 19459 using elovmpo 7690 according to an editorial note (now removed). (Contributed by SN, 7-Jun-2025.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (Base‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ ⨣ = (+g‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 GrpHom 𝑇) ↔ ((𝑆 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝑇 ∈ Grp) ∧ (𝐹:𝑋⟶𝑌 ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐹‘(𝑢 + 𝑣)) = ((𝐹‘𝑢) ⨣ (𝐹‘𝑣)))))
Theorem	aprilfools2025 43878	An abuse of notation. (Contributed by Prof. Loof Lirpa, 1-Apr-2025.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ {⟨“𝐴𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑙”⟩, ⟨“𝑓𝑜𝑜𝑙𝑠!”⟩} ∈ V
21.33.9.1  Standard replacements of ax-10 , ax-11 , ax-12 It is known that ax-10 2180, ax-11 2197, and ax-12 2216 are logically redundant in a weak sense. Practically, they can be replaced with hbn1w 2083, alcomimw 2078, and ax12wlem 2171 as long as you can fully substitute 𝑦 for 𝑥 in the relevant wff (that is, 𝑥 cannot appear in the wff after substituting). This strategy (which I will call a "standard replacement" of axioms) has a lot of potential, for example it works with df-fv 6566 and df-mpt 5190, two very common constructions. But doing a standard replacement of ax-10 2180, ax-11 2197, and ax-12 2216 takes unsatisfyingly long. Usually, if another approach is found, that approach is shorter and better.
Theorem	nfa1w 43879*	Replace ax-10 2180 in nfa1 2191 with a substitution hypothesis. (Contributed by SN, 2-Sep-2025.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑥𝜑
Theorem	eu6w 43880*	Replace ax-10 2180, ax-12 2216 in eu6 2602 with substitution hypotheses. (Contributed by SN, 27-May-2025.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
Theorem	abbibw 43881*	Replace ax-10 2180, ax-11 2197, ax-12 2216 in abbib 2832 with substitution hypotheses. (Contributed by SN, 27-May-2025.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	absnw 43882*	Replace ax-10 2180, ax-11 2197, ax-12 2216 in absn 4604 with a substitution hypothesis. (Contributed by SN, 27-May-2025.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑌} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑌))
Theorem	euabsn2w 43883*	Replace ax-10 2180, ax-11 2197, ax-12 2216 in euabsn2 4686 with substitution hypotheses. (Contributed by SN, 27-May-2025.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦})
21.34  Mathbox for Igor Ieskov
Theorem	cu3addd 43884	Cube of sum of three numbers. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 14-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶)↑3) = (((((𝐴↑3) + (3 · ((𝐴↑2) · 𝐵))) + ((3 · (𝐴 · (𝐵↑2))) + (𝐵↑3))) + (((3 · ((𝐴↑2) · 𝐶)) + (((3 · 2) · (𝐴 · 𝐵)) · 𝐶)) + (3 · ((𝐵↑2) · 𝐶)))) + (((3 · (𝐴 · (𝐶↑2))) + (3 · (𝐵 · (𝐶↑2)))) + (𝐶↑3))))
Theorem	negexpidd 43885	The sum of a real number to the power of N and the negative of the number to the power of N equals zero if N is a nonnegative odd integer. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 21-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑𝑁) + ( -𝐴↑𝑁)) = 0)
Theorem	rexlimdv3d 43886*	An extended version of rexlimdvv 3222 to include three set variables. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 21-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝜓 → 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝜓 → 𝜒))
Theorem	3cubeslem1 43887	Lemma for 3cubes 43893. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 22-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (((𝐴 + 1)↑2) − 𝐴))
Theorem	3cubeslem2 43888	Lemma for 3cubes 43893. Used to show that the denominators in 3cubeslem4 43892 are nonzero. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 22-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑2)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) + 3) = 0)
Theorem	3cubeslem3l 43889	Lemma for 3cubes 43893. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 22-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · (((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑2)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) + 3)↑3)) = (((𝐴↑7) · (3↑9)) + (((𝐴↑6) · (3↑9)) + (((𝐴↑5) · ((3↑8) + (3↑8))) + (((𝐴↑4) · (((3↑7) · 2) + (3↑6))) + (((𝐴↑3) · ((3↑6) + (3↑6))) + (((𝐴↑2) · (3↑5)) + (𝐴 · (3↑3)))))))))
Theorem	3cubeslem3r 43890	Lemma for 3cubes 43893. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 22-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑3)) − 1)↑3) + ((( -((3↑3) · (𝐴↑3)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) + 1)↑3)) + ((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑2)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴))↑3)) = (((𝐴↑7) · (3↑9)) + (((𝐴↑6) · (3↑9)) + (((𝐴↑5) · ((3↑8) + (3↑8))) + (((𝐴↑4) · (((3↑7) · 2) + (3↑6))) + (((𝐴↑3) · ((3↑6) + (3↑6))) + (((𝐴↑2) · (3↑5)) + (𝐴 · (3↑3)))))))))
Theorem	3cubeslem3 43891	Lemma for 3cubes 43893. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 22-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · (((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑2)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) + 3)↑3)) = ((((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑3)) − 1)↑3) + ((( -((3↑3) · (𝐴↑3)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) + 1)↑3)) + ((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑2)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴))↑3)))
Theorem	3cubeslem4 43892	Lemma for 3cubes 43893. This is Ryley's explicit formula for decomposing a rational 𝐴 into a sum of three rational cubes. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 22-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (((((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑3)) − 1) / ((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑2)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) + 3))↑3) + (((( -((3↑3) · (𝐴↑3)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) + 1) / ((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑2)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) + 3))↑3)) + (((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑2)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) / ((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑2)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) + 3))↑3)))
Theorem	3cubes 43893*	Every rational number is a sum of three rational cubes. See S. Ryley, The Ladies' Diary 122 (1825), 35. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 22-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℚ ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℚ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℚ ∃𝑐 ∈ ℚ 𝐴 = (((𝑎↑3) + (𝑏↑3)) + (𝑐↑3)))
21.35  Mathbox for Timothy J. O'Malley
Theorem	omexcn 43894	The axioms of the complex numbers imply the Axiom of Infinity (in the form of omex 9671): the map of om2uzf1oi 14123 is a one-to-one onto mapping from ω onto a set of integers, so ω is a set. Compare dcomex 10552 and grothomex 10941. Note that our proof depends on neither ax-inf 9666 nor ax-inf2 9669. (Contributed by Timothy J. O'Malley, 8-Oct-2026.)
⊢ ω ∈ V
21.36  Mathbox for OpenAI
Theorem	rntrclfvOAI 43895	The range of the transitive closure is equal to the range of the relation. (Contributed by OpenAI, 7-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ran (t+‘𝑅) = ran 𝑅)
21.37  Mathbox for Stefan O'Rear
21.37.1  Additional elementary logic and set theory
Theorem	moxfr 43896*	Transfer at-most-one between related expressions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ ∃!𝑦 𝑥 = 𝐴    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃*𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑦𝜓)
21.37.2  Additional theory of functions
Theorem	imaiinfv 43897*	Indexed intersection of an image. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐹‘𝑥) = ∩ (𝐹 “ 𝐵))
21.37.3  Additional topology
Theorem	elrfi 43898*	Elementhood in a set of relative finite intersections. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ (fi‘({𝐵} ∪ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝒫 𝐶 ∩ Fin)𝐴 = (𝐵 ∩ ∩ 𝑣)))
Theorem	elrfirn 43899*	Elementhood in a set of relative finite intersections of an indexed family of sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐼⟶𝒫 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ (fi‘({𝐵} ∪ ran 𝐹)) ↔ ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝒫 𝐼 ∩ Fin)𝐴 = (𝐵 ∩ ∩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑣 (𝐹‘𝑦))))
Theorem	elrfirn2 43900*	Elementhood in a set of relative finite intersections of an indexed family of sets (implicit). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐼 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ (fi‘({𝐵} ∪ ran (𝑦 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ 𝐶))) ↔ ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝒫 𝐼 ∩ Fin)𝐴 = (𝐵 ∩ ∩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑣 𝐶)))