P. 439 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 43801-43900   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	rr-grothshortbi 43801*	Express "every set is contained in a Grothendieck universe" in a short form while avoiding complicated definitions. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 8-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∃𝑦 ∈ Univ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝒫 𝑦∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ (𝑦 ∩ 𝑤) ∧ (𝑧 ∩ ∪ 𝑓) ⊆ ∪ (𝑓 ∩ 𝒫 𝒫 𝑤))))
Theorem	rr-grothshort 43802*	A shorter equivalent of ax-groth 10841 than rr-groth 43797 using a few more simple defined symbols. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 8-Oct-2024.)
⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝒫 𝑦∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ (𝑦 ∩ 𝑤) ∧ (𝑧 ∩ ∪ 𝑓) ⊆ ∪ (𝑓 ∩ 𝒫 𝒫 𝑤)))
21.37  Mathbox for Steve Rodriguez
21.37.1  Miscellanea
Theorem	nanorxor 43803	'nand' is equivalent to the equivalence of inclusive and exclusive or. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 28-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓) ↔ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)))
Theorem	undisjrab 43804	Union of two disjoint restricted class abstractions; compare unrab 4301. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 28-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = ∅ ↔ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)})
Theorem	iso0 43805	The empty set is an 𝑅, 𝑆 isomorphism from the empty set to the empty set. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 24-Oct-2015.)
⊢ ∅ Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (∅, ∅)
Theorem	ssrecnpr 43806	ℝ is a subset of both ℝ and ℂ. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (𝑆 ∈ {ℝ, ℂ} → ℝ ⊆ 𝑆)
Theorem	seff 43807	Let set 𝑆 be the real or complex numbers. Then the exponential function restricted to 𝑆 is a mapping from 𝑆 to 𝑆. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 6-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ {ℝ, ℂ})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (exp ↾ 𝑆):𝑆⟶𝑆)
Theorem	sblpnf 43808	The infinity ball in the absolute value metric is just the whole space. 𝑆 analogue of blpnf 24316. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 8-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ {ℝ, ℂ})    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((abs ∘ − ) ↾ (𝑆 × 𝑆))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑃(ball‘𝐷)+∞) = 𝑆)
Theorem	prmunb2 43809*	The primes are unbounded. This generalizes prmunb 16877 to real 𝐴 with arch 12494 and lttrd 11400: every real is less than some positive integer, itself less than some prime. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ 𝐴 < 𝑝)
21.37.2  Ratio test for infinite series convergence and divergence
Theorem	dvgrat 43810*	Ratio test for divergence of a complex infinite series. See e.g. remark "if (abs‘((𝑎‘(𝑛 + 1)) / (𝑎‘𝑛))) ≥ 1 for all large n..." in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ratio_test#The_test. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 28-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (ℤ≥‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑊) → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) ≤ (abs‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ∉ dom ⇝ )
Theorem	cvgdvgrat 43811*	Ratio test for convergence and divergence of a complex infinite series. If the ratio 𝑅 of the absolute values of successive terms in an infinite sequence 𝐹 converges to less than one, then the infinite sum of the terms of 𝐹 converges to a complex number; and if 𝑅 converges greater then the sum diverges. This combined form of cvgrat 15856 and dvgrat 43810 directly uses the limit of the ratio. (It also demonstrates how to use climi2 15482 and absltd 15403 to transform a limit to an inequality cf. https://math.stackexchange.com/q/2215191 15403, and how to use r19.29a 3152 in a similar fashion to Mario Carneiro's proof sketch with rexlimdva 3145 at https://groups.google.com/g/metamath/c/2RPikOiXLMo 3145.) (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 28-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (ℤ≥‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (𝑘 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (abs‘((𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1)) / (𝐹‘𝑘))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⇝ 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ≠ 1)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐿 < 1 ↔ seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ ))
Theorem	radcnvrat 43812*	Let 𝐿 be the limit, if one exists, of the ratio (abs‘((𝐴‘(𝑘 + 1)) / (𝐴‘𝑘))) (as in the ratio test cvgdvgrat 43811) as 𝑘 increases. Then the radius of convergence of power series Σ𝑛 ∈ ℕ0((𝐴‘𝑛) · (𝑥↑𝑛)) is (1 / 𝐿) if 𝐿 is nonzero. Proof "The limit involved in the ratio test..." in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radius_of_convergence 43811 —a few lines that evidently hide quite an involved process to confirm. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 8-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐴‘𝑛) · (𝑥↑𝑛))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴:ℕ0⟶ℂ)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = sup({𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∣ seq0( + , (𝐺‘𝑟)) ∈ dom ⇝ }, ℝ*, < )    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (abs‘((𝐴‘(𝑘 + 1)) / (𝐴‘𝑘))))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐴‘𝑘) ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ⇝ 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ≠ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = (1 / 𝐿))
21.37.3  Multiples
Theorem	reldvds 43813	The divides relation is in fact a relation. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ Rel ∥
Theorem	nznngen 43814	All positive integers in the set of multiples of n, nℤ, are the absolute value of n or greater. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (( ∥ “ {𝑁}) ∩ ℕ) ⊆ (ℤ≥‘(abs‘𝑁)))
Theorem	nzss 43815	The set of multiples of m, mℤ, is a subset of those of n, nℤ, iff n divides m. Lemma 2.1(a) of https://www.mscs.dal.ca/~selinger/3343/handouts/ideals.pdf p. 5, with mℤ and nℤ as images of the divides relation under m and n. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (( ∥ “ {𝑀}) ⊆ ( ∥ “ {𝑁}) ↔ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑀))
Theorem	nzin 43816	The intersection of the set of multiples of m, mℤ, and those of n, nℤ, is the set of multiples of their least common multiple. Roughly Lemma 2.1(c) of https://www.mscs.dal.ca/~selinger/3343/handouts/ideals.pdf p. 5 and Problem 1(b) of https://people.math.binghamton.edu/mazur/teach/40107/40107h16sol.pdf p. 1, with mℤ and nℤ as images of the divides relation under m and n. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (( ∥ “ {𝑀}) ∩ ( ∥ “ {𝑁})) = ( ∥ “ {(𝑀 lcm 𝑁)}))
Theorem	nzprmdif 43817	Subtract one prime's multiples from an unequal prime's. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≠ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (( ∥ “ {𝑀}) ∖ ( ∥ “ {𝑁})) = (( ∥ “ {𝑀}) ∖ ( ∥ “ {(𝑀 · 𝑁)})))
Theorem	hashnzfz 43818	Special case of hashdvds 16738: the count of multiples in nℤ restricted to an interval. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐽 − 1)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘(( ∥ “ {𝑁}) ∩ (𝐽...𝐾))) = ((⌊‘(𝐾 / 𝑁)) − (⌊‘((𝐽 − 1) / 𝑁))))
Theorem	hashnzfz2 43819	Special case of hashnzfz 43818: the count of multiples in nℤ, n greater than one, restricted to an interval starting at two. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘(( ∥ “ {𝑁}) ∩ (2...𝐾))) = (⌊‘(𝐾 / 𝑁)))
Theorem	hashnzfzclim 43820*	As the upper bound 𝐾 of the constraint interval (𝐽...𝐾) in hashnzfz 43818 increases, the resulting count of multiples tends to (𝐾 / 𝑀) —that is, there are approximately (𝐾 / 𝑀) multiples of 𝑀 in a finite interval of integers. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ ℤ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐽 − 1)) ↦ ((♯‘(( ∥ “ {𝑀}) ∩ (𝐽...𝑘))) / 𝑘)) ⇝ (1 / 𝑀))
21.37.4  Function operations
Theorem	caofcan 43821*	Transfer a cancellation law like mulcan 11876 to the function operation. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 16-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝑅𝑦) = (𝑥𝑅𝑧) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) = (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐻) ↔ 𝐺 = 𝐻))
Theorem	ofsubid 43822	Function analogue of subid 11504. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 5-Nov-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ) → (𝐹 ∘f − 𝐹) = (𝐴 × {0}))
Theorem	ofmul12 43823	Function analogue of mul12 11404. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 13-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ) ∧ (𝐺:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐻:𝐴⟶ℂ)) → (𝐹 ∘f · (𝐺 ∘f · 𝐻)) = (𝐺 ∘f · (𝐹 ∘f · 𝐻)))
Theorem	ofdivrec 43824	Function analogue of divrec 11913, a division analogue of ofnegsub 12235. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 3-Nov-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶(ℂ ∖ {0})) → (𝐹 ∘f · ((𝐴 × {1}) ∘f / 𝐺)) = (𝐹 ∘f / 𝐺))
Theorem	ofdivcan4 43825	Function analogue of divcan4 11924. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 4-Nov-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶(ℂ ∖ {0})) → ((𝐹 ∘f · 𝐺) ∘f / 𝐺) = 𝐹)
Theorem	ofdivdiv2 43826	Function analogue of divdiv2 11951. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 23-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ) ∧ (𝐺:𝐴⟶(ℂ ∖ {0}) ∧ 𝐻:𝐴⟶(ℂ ∖ {0}))) → (𝐹 ∘f / (𝐺 ∘f / 𝐻)) = ((𝐹 ∘f · 𝐻) ∘f / 𝐺))
21.37.5  Calculus
Theorem	lhe4.4ex1a 43827	Example of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, part two (ftc2 25992): ∫(1(,)2)((𝑥↑2) − 3) d𝑥 = -(2 / 3). Section 4.4 example 1a of [LarsonHostetlerEdwards] p. 311. (The book teaches ftc2 25992 as simply the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus", then ftc1 25990 as the "Second Fundamental Theorem of Calculus".) (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 28-Oct-2015.) (Revised by Steve Rodriguez, 31-Oct-2015.)
⊢ ∫(1(,)2)((𝑥↑2) − 3) d𝑥 = -(2 / 3)
Theorem	dvsconst 43828	Derivative of a constant function on the real or complex numbers. The function may return a complex 𝐴 even if 𝑆 is ℝ. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 11-Nov-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ {ℝ, ℂ} ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) → (𝑆 D (𝑆 × {𝐴})) = (𝑆 × {0}))
Theorem	dvsid 43829	Derivative of the identity function on the real or complex numbers. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 11-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (𝑆 ∈ {ℝ, ℂ} → (𝑆 D ( I ↾ 𝑆)) = (𝑆 × {1}))
Theorem	dvsef 43830	Derivative of the exponential function on the real or complex numbers. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 12-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (𝑆 ∈ {ℝ, ℂ} → (𝑆 D (exp ↾ 𝑆)) = (exp ↾ 𝑆))
Theorem	expgrowthi 43831*	Exponential growth and decay model. See expgrowth 43833 for more information. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 4-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ {ℝ, ℂ})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (𝑡 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ (𝐶 · (exp‘(𝐾 · 𝑡))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 D 𝑌) = ((𝑆 × {𝐾}) ∘f · 𝑌))
Theorem	dvconstbi 43832*	The derivative of a function on 𝑆 is zero iff it is a constant function. Roughly a biconditional 𝑆 analogue of dvconst 25859 and dveq0 25946. Corresponds to integration formula "∫0 d𝑥 = 𝐶 " in section 4.1 of [LarsonHostetlerEdwards] p. 278. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 11-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ {ℝ, ℂ})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌:𝑆⟶ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (𝑆 D 𝑌) = 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆 D 𝑌) = (𝑆 × {0}) ↔ ∃𝑐 ∈ ℂ 𝑌 = (𝑆 × {𝑐})))
Theorem	expgrowth 43833*	Exponential growth and decay model. The derivative of a function y of variable t equals a constant k times y itself, iff y equals some constant C times the exponential of kt. This theorem and expgrowthi 43831 illustrate one of the simplest and most crucial classes of differential equations, equations that relate functions to their derivatives. Section 6.3 of [Strang] p. 242 calls y' = ky "the most important differential equation in applied mathematics". In the field of population ecology it is known as the Malthusian growth model or exponential law, and C, k, and t correspond to initial population size, growth rate, and time respectively (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malthusian_growth_model 43831); and in finance, the model appears in a similar role in continuous compounding with C as the initial amount of money. In exponential decay models, k is often expressed as the negative of a positive constant λ. Here y' is given as (𝑆 D 𝑌), C as 𝑐, and ky as ((𝑆 × {𝐾}) ∘f · 𝑌). (𝑆 × {𝐾}) is the constant function that maps any real or complex input to k and ∘f · is multiplication as a function operation. The leftward direction of the biconditional is as given in http://www.saylor.org/site/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/MA221-2.1.1.pdf 43831 pp. 1-2, which also notes the reverse direction ("While we will not prove this here, it turns out that these are the only functions that satisfy this equation."). The rightward direction is Theorem 5.1 of [LarsonHostetlerEdwards] p. 375 (which notes " C is the initial value of y, and k is the proportionality constant. Exponential growth occurs when k > 0, and exponential decay occurs when k < 0."); its proof here closely follows the proof of y' = y in https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Exponential_Growth_Equation/Special_Case 43831. Statements for this and expgrowthi 43831 formulated by Mario Carneiro. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 24-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ {ℝ, ℂ})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌:𝑆⟶ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (𝑆 D 𝑌) = 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆 D 𝑌) = ((𝑆 × {𝐾}) ∘f · 𝑌) ↔ ∃𝑐 ∈ ℂ 𝑌 = (𝑡 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ (𝑐 · (exp‘(𝐾 · 𝑡))))))
21.37.6  The generalized binomial coefficient operation
Syntax	cbcc 43834	Extend class notation to include the generalized binomial coefficient operation.
class C𝑐
Definition	df-bcc 43835*	Define a generalized binomial coefficient operation, which unlike df-bc 14289 allows complex numbers for the first argument. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ C𝑐 = (𝑐 ∈ ℂ, 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝑐 FallFac 𝑘) / (!‘𝑘)))
Theorem	bccval 43836	Value of the generalized binomial coefficient, 𝐶 choose 𝐾. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶C𝑐𝐾) = ((𝐶 FallFac 𝐾) / (!‘𝐾)))
Theorem	bcccl 43837	Closure of the generalized binomial coefficient. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶C𝑐𝐾) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	bcc0 43838	The generalized binomial coefficient 𝐶 choose 𝐾 is zero iff 𝐶 is an integer between zero and (𝐾 − 1) inclusive. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶C𝑐𝐾) = 0 ↔ 𝐶 ∈ (0...(𝐾 − 1))))
Theorem	bccp1k 43839	Generalized binomial coefficient: 𝐶 choose (𝐾 + 1). (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶C𝑐(𝐾 + 1)) = ((𝐶C𝑐𝐾) · ((𝐶 − 𝐾) / (𝐾 + 1))))
Theorem	bccm1k 43840	Generalized binomial coefficient: 𝐶 choose (𝐾 − 1), when 𝐶 is not (𝐾 − 1). (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {(𝐾 − 1)}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶C𝑐(𝐾 − 1)) = ((𝐶C𝑐𝐾) / ((𝐶 − (𝐾 − 1)) / 𝐾)))
Theorem	bccn0 43841	Generalized binomial coefficient: 𝐶 choose 0. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶C𝑐0) = 1)
Theorem	bccn1 43842	Generalized binomial coefficient: 𝐶 choose 1. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶C𝑐1) = 𝐶)
Theorem	bccbc 43843	The binomial coefficient and generalized binomial coefficient are equal when their arguments are nonnegative integers. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁C𝑐𝐾) = (𝑁C𝐾))
21.37.7  Binomial series
Theorem	uzmptshftfval 43844*	When 𝐹 is a maps-to function on some set of upper integers 𝑍 that returns a set 𝐵, (𝐹 shift 𝑁) is another maps-to function on the shifted set of upper integers 𝑊. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 − 𝑁) → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (ℤ≥‘(𝑀 + 𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 shift 𝑁) = (𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ 𝐶))
Theorem	dvradcnv2 43845*	The radius of convergence of the (formal) derivative 𝐻 of the power series 𝐺 is (at least) as large as the radius of convergence of 𝐺. This version of dvradcnv 26370 uses a shifted version of 𝐻 to match the sum form of (ℂ D 𝐹) in pserdv2 26380 (and shows how to use uzmptshftfval 43844 to shift a maps-to function on a set of upper integers). (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐴‘𝑛) · (𝑥↑𝑛))))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = sup({𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∣ seq0( + , (𝐺‘𝑟)) ∈ dom ⇝ }, ℝ*, < )    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑛 · (𝐴‘𝑛)) · (𝑋↑(𝑛 − 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴:ℕ0⟶ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝑋) < 𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐻) ∈ dom ⇝ )
Theorem	binomcxplemwb 43846	Lemma for binomcxp 43855. The lemma in the Wikibooks proof. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐶 − 𝐾) · (𝐶C𝑐𝐾)) + ((𝐶 − (𝐾 − 1)) · (𝐶C𝑐(𝐾 − 1)))) = (𝐶 · (𝐶C𝑐𝐾)))
Theorem	binomcxplemnn0 43847*	Lemma for binomcxp 43855. When 𝐶 is a nonnegative integer, the binomial's finite sum value by the standard binomial theorem binom 15803 equals this generalized infinite sum: the generalized binomial coefficient and exponentiation operators give exactly the same values in the standard index set (0...𝐶), and when the index set is widened beyond 𝐶 the additional values are just zeroes. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐵) < (abs‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵)↑𝑐𝐶) = Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ((𝐶C𝑐𝑘) · ((𝐴↑𝑐(𝐶 − 𝑘)) · (𝐵↑𝑘))))
Theorem	binomcxplemrat 43848*	Lemma for binomcxp 43855. As 𝑘 increases, this ratio's absolute value converges to one. Part of equation "Since continuity of the absolute value..." in the Wikibooks proof (proven for the inverse ratio, which we later show is no problem). (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐵) < (abs‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (abs‘((𝐶 − 𝑘) / (𝑘 + 1)))) ⇝ 1)
Theorem	binomcxplemfrat 43849*	Lemma for binomcxp 43855. binomcxplemrat 43848 implies that when 𝐶 is not a nonnegative integer, the absolute value of the ratio ((𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1)) / (𝐹‘𝑘)) converges to one. The rest of equation "Since continuity of the absolute value..." in the Wikibooks proof. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐵) < (abs‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑗 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝐶C𝑐𝑗))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (abs‘((𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1)) / (𝐹‘𝑘)))) ⇝ 1)
Theorem	binomcxplemradcnv 43850*	Lemma for binomcxp 43855. By binomcxplemfrat 43849 and radcnvrat 43812 the radius of convergence of power series Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ0((𝐹‘𝑘) · (𝑏↑𝑘)) is one. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐵) < (abs‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑗 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝐶C𝑐𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑏 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑘) · (𝑏↑𝑘))))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = sup({𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∣ seq0( + , (𝑆‘𝑟)) ∈ dom ⇝ }, ℝ*, < )    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝑅 = 1)
Theorem	binomcxplemdvbinom 43851*	Lemma for binomcxp 43855. By the power and chain rules, calculate the derivative of ((1 + 𝑏)↑𝑐-𝐶), with respect to 𝑏 in the disk of convergence 𝐷. We later multiply the derivative in the later binomcxplemdvsum 43853 by this derivative to show that ((1 + 𝑏)↑𝑐𝐶) (with a nonnegated 𝐶) and the later sum, since both at 𝑏 = 0 equal one, are the same. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐵) < (abs‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑗 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝐶C𝑐𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑏 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑘) · (𝑏↑𝑘))))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = sup({𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∣ seq0( + , (𝑆‘𝑟)) ∈ dom ⇝ }, ℝ*, < )    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑏 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑘 · (𝐹‘𝑘)) · (𝑏↑(𝑘 − 1)))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (◡abs “ (0[,)𝑅))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) → (ℂ D (𝑏 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ ((1 + 𝑏)↑𝑐-𝐶))) = (𝑏 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ (-𝐶 · ((1 + 𝑏)↑𝑐(-𝐶 − 1)))))
Theorem	binomcxplemcvg 43852*	Lemma for binomcxp 43855. The sum in binomcxplemnn0 43847 and its derivative (see the next theorem, binomcxplemdvsum 43853) converge, as long as their base 𝐽 is within the disk of convergence. Part of remark "This convergence allows us to apply term-by-term differentiation..." in the Wikibooks proof. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐵) < (abs‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑗 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝐶C𝑐𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑏 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑘) · (𝑏↑𝑘))))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = sup({𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∣ seq0( + , (𝑆‘𝑟)) ∈ dom ⇝ }, ℝ*, < )    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑏 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑘 · (𝐹‘𝑘)) · (𝑏↑(𝑘 − 1)))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (◡abs “ (0[,)𝑅))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐽 ∈ 𝐷) → (seq0( + , (𝑆‘𝐽)) ∈ dom ⇝ ∧ seq1( + , (𝐸‘𝐽)) ∈ dom ⇝ ))
Theorem	binomcxplemdvsum 43853*	Lemma for binomcxp 43855. The derivative of the generalized sum in binomcxplemnn0 43847. Part of remark "This convergence allows to apply term-by-term differentiation..." in the Wikibooks proof. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐵) < (abs‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑗 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝐶C𝑐𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑏 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑘) · (𝑏↑𝑘))))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = sup({𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∣ seq0( + , (𝑆‘𝑟)) ∈ dom ⇝ }, ℝ*, < )    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑏 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑘 · (𝐹‘𝑘)) · (𝑏↑(𝑘 − 1)))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (◡abs “ (0[,)𝑅))    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑏 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ((𝑆‘𝑏)‘𝑘))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (ℂ D 𝑃) = (𝑏 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ ((𝐸‘𝑏)‘𝑘)))
Theorem	binomcxplemnotnn0 43854*	Lemma for binomcxp 43855. When 𝐶 is not a nonnegative integer, the generalized sum in binomcxplemnn0 43847 —which we will call 𝑃 —is a convergent power series: its base 𝑏 is always of smaller absolute value than the radius of convergence. pserdv2 26380 gives the derivative of 𝑃, which by dvradcnv 26370 also converges in that radius. When 𝐴 is fixed at one, (𝐴 + 𝑏) times that derivative equals (𝐶 · 𝑃) and fraction (𝑃 / ((𝐴 + 𝑏)↑𝑐𝐶)) is always defined with derivative zero, so the fraction is a constant—specifically one, because ((1 + 0)↑𝑐𝐶) = 1. Thus ((1 + 𝑏)↑𝑐𝐶) = (𝑃‘𝑏). Finally, let 𝑏 be (𝐵 / 𝐴), and multiply both the binomial ((1 + (𝐵 / 𝐴))↑𝑐𝐶) and the sum (𝑃‘(𝐵 / 𝐴)) by (𝐴↑𝑐𝐶) to get the result. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐵) < (abs‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑗 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝐶C𝑐𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑏 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑘) · (𝑏↑𝑘))))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = sup({𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∣ seq0( + , (𝑆‘𝑟)) ∈ dom ⇝ }, ℝ*, < )    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑏 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑘 · (𝐹‘𝑘)) · (𝑏↑(𝑘 − 1)))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (◡abs “ (0[,)𝑅))    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑏 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ((𝑆‘𝑏)‘𝑘))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵)↑𝑐𝐶) = Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ((𝐶C𝑐𝑘) · ((𝐴↑𝑐(𝐶 − 𝑘)) · (𝐵↑𝑘))))
Theorem	binomcxp 43855*	Generalize the binomial theorem binom 15803 to positive real summand 𝐴, real summand 𝐵, and complex exponent 𝐶. Proof in https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Advanced_Calculus 15803; see also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_series 15803, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_theorem 15803 (sections "Newton's generalized binomial theorem" and "Future generalizations"), and proof "General Binomial Theorem" in https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Binomial_Theorem 15803. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐵) < (abs‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵)↑𝑐𝐶) = Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ((𝐶C𝑐𝑘) · ((𝐴↑𝑐(𝐶 − 𝑘)) · (𝐵↑𝑘))))
21.38  Mathbox for Andrew Salmon
21.38.1  Principia Mathematica * 10
Theorem	pm10.12 43856*	Theorem *10.12 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 146. In *10, this is treated as an axiom, and the proofs in *10 are based on this theorem. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 17-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → (𝜑 ∨ ∀𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	pm10.14 43857	Theorem *10.14 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 146. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 17-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((∀𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥𝜓) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
Theorem	pm10.251 43858	Theorem *10.251 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 149. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 17-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ∀𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	pm10.252 43859	Theorem *10.252 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 149. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 17-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	pm10.253 43860	Theorem *10.253 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 149. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 17-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	albitr 43861	Theorem *10.301 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 151. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	pm10.42 43862	Theorem *10.42 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 155. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 17-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((∃𝑥𝜑 ∨ ∃𝑥𝜓) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))
Theorem	pm10.52 43863*	Theorem *10.52 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 155. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	pm10.53 43864	Theorem *10.53 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 155. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	pm10.541 43865*	Theorem *10.541 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 155. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)) ↔ (𝜒 ∨ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	pm10.542 43866*	Theorem *10.542 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 156. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜓)) ↔ (𝜒 → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	pm10.55 43867	Theorem *10.55 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 156. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ ((∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)) ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	pm10.56 43868	Theorem *10.56 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 156. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)) → ∃𝑥(𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))
Theorem	pm10.57 43869	Theorem *10.57 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 156. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)) → (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ∨ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)))
21.38.2  Principia Mathematica * 11
Theorem	2alanimi 43870	Removes two universal quantifiers from a statement. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ ((∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜓) → ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜒)
Theorem	2al2imi 43871	Removes two universal quantifiers from a statement. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 → (∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜓 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜒))
Theorem	pm11.11 43872	Theorem *11.11 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 159. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 17-Jun-2011.)
⊢ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑧∀𝑤[𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑
Theorem	pm11.12 43873*	Theorem *11.12 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 159. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 17-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → (𝜑 ∨ ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	19.21vv 43874*	Compare Theorem *11.3 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 161. Special case of theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90 with two quantifiers. See 19.21v 1934. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜓 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑))
Theorem	2alim 43875	Theorem *11.32 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 162. Theorem 19.20 of [Margaris] p. 90 with 2 quantifiers. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	2albi 43876	Theorem *11.33 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 162. Theorem 19.15 of [Margaris] p. 90 with 2 quantifiers. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	2exim 43877	Theorem *11.34 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 162. Theorem 19.22 of [Margaris] p. 90 with 2 quantifiers. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	2exbi 43878	Theorem *11.341 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 162. Theorem 19.18 of [Margaris] p. 90 with 2 quantifiers. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	spsbce-2 43879	Theorem *11.36 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 162. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑)
Theorem	19.33-2 43880	Theorem *11.421 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 163. Theorem 19.33 of [Margaris] p. 90 with 2 quantifiers. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ ((∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 ∨ ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜓) → ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))
Theorem	19.36vv 43881*	Theorem *11.43 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 163. Theorem 19.36 of [Margaris] p. 90 with 2 quantifiers. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)
⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	19.31vv 43882*	Theorem *11.44 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 163. Theorem 19.31 of [Margaris] p. 90 with 2 quantifiers. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))
Theorem	19.37vv 43883*	Theorem *11.46 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 164. Theorem 19.37 of [Margaris] p. 90 with 2 quantifiers. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝜓 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝜓 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑))
Theorem	19.28vv 43884*	Theorem *11.47 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 164. Theorem 19.28 of [Margaris] p. 90 with 2 quantifiers. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑))
Theorem	pm11.52 43885	Theorem *11.52 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 164. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓))
Theorem	aaanv 43886*	Theorem *11.56 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 165. Special case of aaan 2321. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ ((∀𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜓) ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	pm11.57 43887*	Theorem *11.57 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 165. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	pm11.58 43888*	Theorem *11.58 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 165. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	pm11.59 43889*	Theorem *11.59 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 165. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → ∀𝑦∀𝑥((𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) → (𝜓 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)))
Theorem	pm11.6 43890*	Theorem *11.6 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 165. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)
⊢ (∃𝑥(∃𝑦(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ∃𝑦(∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	pm11.61 43891*	Theorem *11.61 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 166. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∃𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	pm11.62 43892*	Theorem *11.62 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 166. Importation combined with the rearrangement with quantifiers. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑦(𝜓 → 𝜒)))
Theorem	pm11.63 43893	Theorem *11.63 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 166. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	pm11.7 43894	Theorem *11.7 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 166. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝜑 ∨ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑)
Theorem	pm11.71 43895*	Theorem *11.71 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 166. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ ((∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑦𝜒) → ((∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑦(𝜒 → 𝜃)) ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜓 ∧ 𝜃))))
21.38.3  Predicate Calculus
Theorem	sbeqal1 43896*	If 𝑥 = 𝑦 always implies 𝑥 = 𝑧, then 𝑦 = 𝑧. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 2-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑧) → 𝑦 = 𝑧)
Theorem	sbeqal1i 43897*	Suppose you know 𝑥 = 𝑦 implies 𝑥 = 𝑧, assuming 𝑥 and 𝑧 are distinct. Then, 𝑦 = 𝑧. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 3-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑧)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑦 = 𝑧
Theorem	sbeqal2i 43898*	If 𝑥 = 𝑦 implies 𝑥 = 𝑧, then we can infer 𝑧 = 𝑦. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 3-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑧)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑧 = 𝑦
Theorem	axc5c4c711 43899	Proof of a theorem that can act as a sole axiom for pure predicate calculus with ax-gen 1789 as the inference rule. This proof extends the idea of axc5c711 38442 and related theorems. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jul-2011.)
⊢ ((∀𝑥∀𝑦 ¬ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → ∀𝑦(∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝜓))) → (∀𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	axc5c4c711toc5 43900	Rederivation of sp 2171 from axc5c4c711 43899. Note that ax6 2377 is used for the rederivation. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jul-2011.) Revised to use ax6v 1964 instead of ax6 2377, so that this rederivation requires only ax6v 1964 and propositional calculus. (Revised by BJ, 14-Sep-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑)