Theorem im2anan9 632

Description: Deduction joining nested implications to form implication of conjunctions. (Contributed by NM, 29-Feb-1996.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
im2an9.1	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
im2an9.2	⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
im2anan9	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜏) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜂)))

Proof of Theorem im2anan9

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		im2an9.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
2	1	adantrd 497	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜒))
3		im2an9.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))
4	3	adantld 496	. 2 ⊢ (𝜃 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂))
5	2, 4	anim12ii 630	1 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜏) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜂)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402

This theorem is used by:  im2anan9r  633  anim12  821  mo4  2594  trin  5230  somo  5605  xpss12  5673  f1oun  6874  poxp  8177  soxp  8178  brecop  8869  dfac5lem4  10244  ingru  10939  genpss  11128  genpnnp  11129  tgcl  23342  txlm  24022  upgrpredgv  29774  3wlkdlem4  30820  frgrwopreglem5  30979  frgrwopreglem5ALT  30980  acwer1prclem  35892  icorempo  38542  ax12eq  40264  ax12el  40265  odd2prm2  49089