Theorem im2anan9 632

Description: Deduction joining nested implications to form implication of conjunctions. (Contributed by NM, 29-Feb-1996.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
im2an9.1	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
im2an9.2	⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
im2anan9	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜏) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜂)))

Proof of Theorem im2anan9

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		im2an9.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
2	1	adantrd 497	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜒))
3		im2an9.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))
4	3	adantld 496	. 2 ⊢ (𝜃 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂))
5	2, 4	anim12ii 630	1 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜏) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜂)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402

This theorem is used by:  im2anan9r  633  anim12  821  mo4  2591  trin  5223  somo  5597  xpss12  5665  f1oun  6844  poxp  8140  soxp  8141  brecop  8831  dfac5lem4  10205  ingru  10900  genpss  11089  genpnnp  11090  tgcl  23287  txlm  23967  upgrpredgv  29717  3wlkdlem4  30763  frgrwopreglem5  30922  frgrwopreglem5ALT  30923  acwer1prclem  35759  icorempo  38275  ax12eq  39999  ax12el  40000  odd2prm2  48816