P. 7 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 601-700   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	syldanl 601	A syllogism deduction with conjoined antecedents. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 20-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)
Theorem	syland 602	A syllogism deduction. (Contributed by NM, 15-Dec-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏))
Theorem	sylani 603	A syllogism inference. (Contributed by NM, 2-May-1996.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏))
Theorem	sylan2d 604	A syllogism deduction. (Contributed by NM, 15-Dec-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜏))
Theorem	sylan2i 605	A syllogism inference. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜏))
Theorem	syl2ani 606	A syllogism inference. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-1999.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜂 → 𝜃)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜏))
Theorem	syl2and 607	A syllogism deduction. (Contributed by NM, 15-Dec-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜂))
Theorem	anim12d 608	Conjoin antecedents and consequents in a deduction. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 18-Dec-2013.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏)))
Theorem	anim12d1 609	Variant of anim12d 608 where the second implication does not depend on the antecedent. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 12-Oct-2010.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏)))
Theorem	anim1d 610	Add a conjunct to right of antecedent and consequent in a deduction. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1994.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)))
Theorem	anim2d 611	Add a conjunct to left of antecedent and consequent in a deduction. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1993.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜃 ∧ 𝜒)))
Theorem	anim12i 612	Conjoin antecedents and consequents of two premises. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 14-Dec-2013.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜓 ∧ 𝜃))
Theorem	anim12ci 613	Variant of anim12i 612 with commutation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	anim1i 614	Introduce conjunct to both sides of an implication. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))
Theorem	anim1ci 615	Introduce conjunct to both sides of an implication. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	anim2i 616	Introduce conjunct to both sides of an implication. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-1993.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	anim12ii 617	Conjoin antecedents and consequents in a deduction. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2007.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 19-Jul-2013.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜓 → 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → (𝜓 → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏)))
Theorem	anim12dan 618	Conjoin antecedents and consequents in a deduction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 16-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜃)) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏))
Theorem	im2anan9 619	Deduction joining nested implications to form implication of conjunctions. (Contributed by NM, 29-Feb-1996.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜏) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜂)))
Theorem	im2anan9r 620	Deduction joining nested implications to form implication of conjunctions. (Contributed by NM, 29-Feb-1996.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜑) → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜏) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜂)))
Theorem	pm3.45 621	Theorem *3.45 (Fact) of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)))
Theorem	anbi2i 622	Introduce a left conjunct to both sides of a logical equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	anbi1i 623	Introduce a right conjunct to both sides of a logical equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 12-Mar-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))
Theorem	anbi2ci 624	Variant of anbi2i 622 with commutation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	anbi1ci 625	Variant of anbi1i 623 with commutation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 7-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))
Theorem	anbi12i 626	Conjoin both sides of two equivalences. (Contributed by NM, 12-Mar-1993.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜃))
Theorem	anbi12ci 627	Variant of anbi12i 626 with commutation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	anbi2d 628	Deduction adding a left conjunct to both sides of a logical equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝜒)))
Theorem	anbi1d 629	Deduction adding a right conjunct to both sides of a logical equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)))
Theorem	anbi12d 630	Deduction joining two equivalences to form equivalence of conjunctions. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏)))
Theorem	anbi1 631	Introduce a right conjunct to both sides of a logical equivalence. Theorem *4.36 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 118. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)))
Theorem	anbi2 632	Introduce a left conjunct to both sides of a logical equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-2013.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜓)))
Theorem	anbi1cd 633	Introduce a proposition as left conjunct on the left-hand side and right conjunct on the right-hand side of an equivalence. Deduction form. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-May-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)))
Theorem	bianbi 634	Exchanging conjunction in a biconditional. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝜒))
Theorem	an2anr 635	Double commutation in conjunction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)) ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ (𝜃 ∧ 𝜒)))
Theorem	pm4.38 636	Theorem *4.38 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 118. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃)) → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)))
Theorem	bi2anan9 637	Deduction joining two equivalences to form equivalence of conjunctions. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-1995.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜏) ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜂)))
Theorem	bi2anan9r 638	Deduction joining two equivalences to form equivalence of conjunctions. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-1996.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜑) → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜏) ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜂)))
Theorem	bi2bian9 639	Deduction joining two biconditionals with different antecedents. (Contributed by NM, 12-May-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → ((𝜓 ↔ 𝜏) ↔ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜂)))
Theorem	anbiim 640	Adding biconditional when antecedents are conjuncted. (Contributed by metakunt, 16-Apr-2024.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 7-May-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))
Theorem	bianass 641	An inference to merge two lists of conjuncts. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 23-May-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜂 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝜂 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒))
Theorem	bianassc 642	An inference to merge two lists of conjuncts. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜂 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜒))
Theorem	an21 643	Swap two conjuncts. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 18-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)))
Theorem	an12 644	Swap two conjuncts. Note that the first digit (1) in the label refers to the outer conjunct position, and the next digit (2) to the inner conjunct position. (Contributed by NM, 12-Mar-1995.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 18-Sep-2022.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ↔ (𝜓 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)))
Theorem	an32 645	A rearrangement of conjuncts. (Contributed by NM, 12-Mar-1995.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 25-Dec-2012.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	an13 646	A rearrangement of conjuncts. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-2012.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 31-Dec-2012.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ↔ (𝜒 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑)))
Theorem	an31 647	A rearrangement of conjuncts. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-2012.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 31-Dec-2012.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	an12s 648	Swap two conjuncts in antecedent. The label suffix "s" means that an12 644 is combined with syl 17 (or a variant). (Contributed by NM, 13-Mar-1996.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜃)
Theorem	ancom2s 649	Inference commuting a nested conjunction in antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 24-May-2006.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜃)
Theorem	an13s 650	Swap two conjuncts in antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-2006.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑)) → 𝜃)
Theorem	an32s 651	Swap two conjuncts in antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 13-Mar-1996.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃)
Theorem	ancom1s 652	Inference commuting a nested conjunction in antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 24-May-2006.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)
Theorem	an31s 653	Swap two conjuncts in antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-2006.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝜒 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜃)
Theorem	anass1rs 654	Commutative-associative law for conjunction in an antecedent. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃)
Theorem	an4 655	Rearrangement of 4 conjuncts. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jul-1994.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜃)))
Theorem	an42 656	Rearrangement of 4 conjuncts. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-1996.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜃 ∧ 𝜓)))
Theorem	an43 657	Rearrangement of 4 conjuncts. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 24-Sep-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)))
Theorem	an3 658	A rearrangement of conjuncts. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 25-Sep-2010.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)) → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜃))
Theorem	an4s 659	Inference rearranging 4 conjuncts in antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1995.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜃)) → 𝜏)
Theorem	an42s 660	Inference rearranging 4 conjuncts in antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1995.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜃 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜏)
Theorem	anabs1 661	Absorption into embedded conjunct. (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-1995.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	anabs5 662	Absorption into embedded conjunct. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jul-1996.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 9-Dec-2012.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	anabs7 663	Absorption into embedded conjunct. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jul-1996.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 17-Nov-2013.)
⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	anabsan 664	Absorption of antecedent with conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-1996.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
Theorem	anabss1 665	Absorption of antecedent into conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jul-1996.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 31-Dec-2012.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
Theorem	anabss4 666	Absorption of antecedent into conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jul-1996.)
⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
Theorem	anabss5 667	Absorption of antecedent into conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 1-Jan-2013.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
Theorem	anabsi5 668	Absorption of antecedent into conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-1995.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 18-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
Theorem	anabsi6 669	Absorption of antecedent into conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-2000.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
Theorem	anabsi7 670	Absorption of antecedent into conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jul-1996.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 18-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (𝜓 → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
Theorem	anabsi8 671	Absorption of antecedent into conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 26-Sep-1999.)
⊢ (𝜓 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
Theorem	anabss7 672	Absorption of antecedent into conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jul-1996.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 19-Nov-2013.)
⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
Theorem	anabsan2 673	Absorption of antecedent with conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-2004.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
Theorem	anabss3 674	Absorption of antecedent into conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jul-1996.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 1-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
Theorem	anandi 675	Distribution of conjunction over conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1995.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)))
Theorem	anandir 676	Distribution of conjunction over conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-1995.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)))
Theorem	anandis 677	Inference that undistributes conjunction in the antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jun-2004.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜏)
Theorem	anandirs 678	Inference that undistributes conjunction in the antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jun-2004.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜏)
Theorem	sylanl1 679	A syllogism inference. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)
Theorem	sylanl2 680	A syllogism inference. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jan-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)
Theorem	sylanr1 681	A syllogism inference. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜃)) → 𝜏)
Theorem	sylanr2 682	A syllogism inference. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃)    &   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜑)) → 𝜏)
Theorem	syl6an 683	A syllogism deduction combined with conjoining antecedents. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 28-Oct-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏))
Theorem	syl2an2r 684	syl2anr 596 with antecedents in standard conjunction form. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 27-Aug-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 28-Mar-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)    &   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜏)
Theorem	syl2an2 685	syl2an 595 with antecedents in standard conjunction form. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 27-Aug-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜃)    &   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜏)
Theorem	mpdan 686	An inference based on modus ponens. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 22-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)
Theorem	mpancom 687	An inference based on modus ponens with commutation of antecedents. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 7-Apr-2013.)
⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜑)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜒)
Theorem	mpidan 688	A deduction which "stacks" a hypothesis. (Contributed by Stanislas Polu, 9-Mar-2020.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 28-Mar-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃)
Theorem	mpan 689	An inference based on modus ponens. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 7-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜒)
Theorem	mpan2 690	An inference based on modus ponens. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 19-Nov-2012.)
⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)
Theorem	mp2an 691	An inference based on modus ponens. (Contributed by NM, 13-Apr-1995.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜒
Theorem	mp4an 692	An inference based on modus ponens. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 15-Jun-2010.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ 𝜒    &   ⊢ 𝜃    &   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜏
Theorem	mpan2d 693	A deduction based on modus ponens. (Contributed by NM, 12-Dec-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))
Theorem	mpand 694	A deduction based on modus ponens. (Contributed by NM, 12-Dec-2004.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 7-Apr-2013.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))
Theorem	mpani 695	An inference based on modus ponens. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 19-Nov-2012.)
⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))
Theorem	mpan2i 696	An inference based on modus ponens. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 19-Nov-2012.)
⊢ 𝜒    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))
Theorem	mp2ani 697	An inference based on modus ponens. (Contributed by NM, 12-Dec-2004.)
⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ 𝜒    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃)
Theorem	mp2and 698	A deduction based on modus ponens. (Contributed by NM, 12-Dec-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃)
Theorem	mpanl1 699	An inference based on modus ponens. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 7-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)
Theorem	mpanl2 700	An inference based on modus ponens. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 7-May-2011.)
⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)