Theorem nfcrd 2890

Description: Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
nfcrd.1	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfcrd	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐴(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem nfcrd

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfcrd.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)
2		nfcr 2886	. 2 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
3	1, 2	syl 17	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4  Ⅎwnf 1783   ∈ wcel 2104  Ⅎwnfc 2881

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2106

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 395  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-clel 2808  df-nfc 2883

This theorem is referenced by:  nfeld  2912  dvelimdc  2928  nfraldw  3304  nfcsbd  3918  nfcsbw  3919  nfifd  4556  axextnd  10588  axrepndlem1  10589  axunndlem1  10592  axregnd  10601  axextdist  35075  nfintd  47805  nfiund  47806  nfiundg  47807