Theorem nfcrd 2921

Description: Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
nfcrd.1	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfcrd	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝐴(𝑥, 𝑦)

Proof of Theorem nfcrd

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfcrd.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)
2		nfcr 2917	. 2 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
3	1, 2	syl 18	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4  Ⅎwnf 1816   ∈ wcel 2146  Ⅎwnfc 2912

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-clel 2840  df-nfc 2914

This theorem is used by:  nfeld  2938  dvelimdc  2951  nfraldw  3312  nfcsbd  3879  nfcsbw  3880  nfifd  4519  nfdisjw  5090  axextnd  10591  axrepndlem1  10592  axunndlem1  10595  axregnd  10604  nfchnd  18689  axsepg3  35611  axsepg3ALT  35612  axsepg5  35614  axextdist  36326  nfintd  50508  nfiund  50509  nfiundg  50510