Theorem nfcrd 2918

Description: Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
nfcrd.1	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfcrd	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐴(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem nfcrd

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfcrd.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)
2		nfcr 2914	. 2 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
3	1, 2	syl 17	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4  Ⅎwnf 1803   ∈ wcel 2142  Ⅎwnfc 2909

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1815  ax-4 1829  ax-5 1930  ax-6 1987  ax-7 2028  ax-8 2144

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-ex 1800  df-nf 1804  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911

This theorem is referenced by:  nfeld  2935  dvelimdc  2948  nfraldw  3307  nfcsbd  3877  nfcsbw  3878  nfifd  4510  nfdisjw  5079  axextnd  10549  axrepndlem1  10550  axunndlem1  10553  axregnd  10562  nfchnd  18643  axsepg3  35434  axsepg3ALT  35435  axsepg5  35437  axextdist  36144  nfintd  50291  nfiund  50292  nfiundg  50293