Theorem nfcrd 2925

Description: Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
nfcrd.1	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfcrd	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐴(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem nfcrd

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfcrd.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)
2		nfcr 2921	. 2 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
3	1, 2	syl 18	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4  Ⅎwnf 1810   ∈ wcel 2149  Ⅎwnfc 2916

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1822  ax-4 1836  ax-5 1937  ax-6 1994  ax-7 2035  ax-8 2151

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-ex 1807  df-nf 1811  df-clel 2844  df-nfc 2918

This theorem is referenced by:  nfeld  2942  dvelimdc  2955  nfraldw  3316  nfcsbd  3886  nfcsbw  3887  nfifd  4522  nfdisjw  5092  axextnd  10575  axrepndlem1  10576  axunndlem1  10579  axregnd  10588  nfchnd  18666  axsepg3  35476  axsepg3ALT  35477  axsepg5  35479  axextdist  36187  nfintd  50335  nfiund  50336  nfiundg  50337