Theorem nfcrd 2916

Description: Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
nfcrd.1	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfcrd	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝐴(𝑥, 𝑦)

Proof of Theorem nfcrd

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfcrd.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)
2		nfcr 2912	. 2 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
3	1, 2	syl 18	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4  Ⅎwnf 1815   ∈ wcel 2144  Ⅎwnfc 2907

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909

This theorem is used by:  nfeld  2933  dvelimdc  2946  nfraldw  3307  nfcsbd  3872  nfcsbw  3873  nfifd  4511  nfdisjw  5081  axextnd  10683  axrepndlem1  10684  axunndlem1  10687  axregnd  10696  nfchnd  18794  axsepg3  35877  axsepg3ALT  35878  axsepg5  35880  axextdist  36685  nfintd  50992  nfiund  50993  nfiundg  50994