Theorem nfcrd 2976

Description: Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
nfeqd.1	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfcrd	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦   𝑦,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐴(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem nfcrd

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfeqd.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)
2		nfcr 2961	. 2 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
3	1, 2	syl 17	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4  Ⅎwnf 1882   ∈ wcel 2164  Ⅎwnfc 2956

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1894  ax-4 1908  ax-5 2009  ax-6 2075  ax-7 2112  ax-12 2220

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 199  df-ex 1879  df-nfc 2958

This theorem is referenced by:  nfeqd  2977  nfeld  2978  dvelimdc  2991  nfcsbd  3774  nfifd  4336  axextnd  9735  axrepndlem1  9736  axunndlem1  9739  axregnd  9748  axextdist  32238  nfintd  43325  nfiund  43326