Theorem nfcrd 2945

Description: Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
nfcrd.1	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfcrd	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦   𝑦,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐴(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem nfcrd

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfcrd.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)
2		nfcr 2941	. 2 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
3	1, 2	syl 17	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4  Ⅎwnf 1785   ∈ wcel 2111  Ⅎwnfc 2936

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2113

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-clel 2870  df-nfc 2938

This theorem is referenced by:  nfeld  2966  dvelimdc  2979  nfcsbd  3853  nfcsbw  3854  nfifd  4453  axextnd  10002  axrepndlem1  10003  axunndlem1  10006  axregnd  10015  axextdist  33157  wl-clelsb3df  35028  nfintd  45203  nfiund  45204  nfiundg  45205