Theorem nfcrd 2888

Description: Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
nfcrd.1	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfcrd	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐴(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem nfcrd

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfcrd.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)
2		nfcr 2884	. 2 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
3	1, 2	syl 17	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4  Ⅎwnf 1784   ∈ wcel 2111  Ⅎwnfc 2879

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2113

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-clel 2806  df-nfc 2881

This theorem is referenced by:  nfeld  2906  dvelimdc  2919  nfraldw  3277  nfcsbd  3870  nfcsbw  3871  nfifd  4502  axextnd  10482  axrepndlem1  10483  axunndlem1  10486  axregnd  10495  nfchnd  18517  axsepg2  35094  axsepg2ALT  35095  axextdist  35841  nfintd  49713  nfiund  49714  nfiundg  49715