Theorem axunndlem1 10607

Description: Lemma for the Axiom of Union with no distinct variable conditions. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2403. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
axunndlem1	⊢ ∃𝑥∀𝑦(∃𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦   𝑥,𝑧

Proof of Theorem axunndlem1

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		en2lp 9588	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ¬ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦)
2		elequ2 2160	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧))
3	2	anbi2d 642	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧)))
4	1, 3	mtbii 329	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ¬ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧))
5	4	sps 2223	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → ¬ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧))
6	5	nexdv 1969	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧))
7	6	pm2.21d 122	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → (∃𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))
8	7	axc4i 2354	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑦(∃𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))
9	8	19.8ad 2220	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∃𝑥∀𝑦(∃𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))
10		zfun 7740	. . 3 ⊢ ∃𝑥∀𝑤(∃𝑥(𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥)
11		nfnae 2465	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦 ¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧
12		nfnae 2465	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 ¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧
13		nfvd 1948	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → Ⅎ𝑦 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥)
14		nfcvf 2950	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → Ⅎ𝑦𝑧)
15	14	nfcrd 2918	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → Ⅎ𝑦 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧)
16	13, 15	nfand 1930	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → Ⅎ𝑦(𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧))
17	12, 16	nfexd 2361	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → Ⅎ𝑦∃𝑥(𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧))
18	17, 13	nfimd 1927	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → Ⅎ𝑦(∃𝑥(𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥))
19		elequ1 2152	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑦 → (𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))
20	19	anbi1d 643	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑦 → ((𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧)))
21	20	exbidv 1954	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑥(𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧)))
22	21, 19	imbi12d 347	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑦 → ((∃𝑥(𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ (∃𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)))
23	22	a1i 11	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝑤 = 𝑦 → ((∃𝑥(𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ (∃𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))))
24	11, 18, 23	cbvald 2438	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → (∀𝑤(∃𝑥(𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑦(∃𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)))
25	24	exbidv 1954	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → (∃𝑥∀𝑤(∃𝑥(𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∃𝑥∀𝑦(∃𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)))
26	10, 25	mpbii 236	. 2 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∃𝑥∀𝑦(∃𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))
27	9, 26	pm2.61i 184	1 ⊢ ∃𝑥∀𝑦(∃𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401  ∀wal 1568  ∃wex 1812

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2215  ax-13 2403  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5255  ax-pr 5402  ax-un 7739  ax-reg 9567

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3415  df-v 3455  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-nul 4283  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590  df-op 4594  df-br 5108  df-opab 5172  df-eprel 5559  df-fr 5612

This theorem is used by:  axunnd  10608