Theorem axunndlem1 10579

Description: Lemma for the Axiom of Union with no distinct variable conditions. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2402. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
axunndlem1	⊢ ∃𝑥∀𝑦(∃𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦   𝑥,𝑧

Proof of Theorem axunndlem1

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		en2lp 9574	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ¬ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦)
2		elequ2 2156	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧))
3	2	anbi2d 641	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧)))
4	1, 3	mtbii 329	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ¬ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧))
5	4	sps 2219	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → ¬ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧))
6	5	nexdv 1964	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧))
7	6	pm2.21d 122	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → (∃𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))
8	7	axc4i 2353	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑦(∃𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))
9	8	19.8ad 2216	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∃𝑥∀𝑦(∃𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))
10		zfun 7733	. . 3 ⊢ ∃𝑥∀𝑤(∃𝑥(𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥)
11		nfnae 2464	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦 ¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧
12		nfnae 2464	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 ¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧
13		nfvd 1943	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → Ⅎ𝑦 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥)
14		nfcvf 2949	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → Ⅎ𝑦𝑧)
15	14	nfcrd 2917	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → Ⅎ𝑦 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧)
16	13, 15	nfand 1925	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → Ⅎ𝑦(𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧))
17	12, 16	nfexd 2360	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → Ⅎ𝑦∃𝑥(𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧))
18	17, 13	nfimd 1922	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → Ⅎ𝑦(∃𝑥(𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥))
19		elequ1 2148	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑦 → (𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))
20	19	anbi1d 642	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑦 → ((𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧)))
21	20	exbidv 1949	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑥(𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧)))
22	21, 19	imbi12d 347	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑦 → ((∃𝑥(𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ (∃𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)))
23	22	a1i 11	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝑤 = 𝑦 → ((∃𝑥(𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ (∃𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))))
24	11, 18, 23	cbvald 2437	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → (∀𝑤(∃𝑥(𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑦(∃𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)))
25	24	exbidv 1949	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → (∃𝑥∀𝑤(∃𝑥(𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∃𝑥∀𝑦(∃𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)))
26	10, 25	mpbii 236	. 2 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∃𝑥∀𝑦(∃𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))
27	9, 26	pm2.61i 184	1 ⊢ ∃𝑥∀𝑦(∃𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400  ∀wal 1566  ∃wex 1807

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1823  ax-4 1837  ax-5 1938  ax-6 1995  ax-7 2036  ax-8 2143  ax-9 2151  ax-10 2174  ax-11 2190  ax-12 2211  ax-13 2402  ax-ext 2733  ax-sep 5256  ax-pr 5404  ax-un 7732  ax-reg 9553

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1103  df-tru 1571  df-fal 1581  df-ex 1808  df-nf 1812  df-sb 2095  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nfc 2910  df-ne 2957  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-rab 3415  df-v 3455  df-dif 3907  df-un 3909  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921  df-nul 4286  df-if 4487  df-pw 4563  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4595  df-br 5109  df-opab 5173  df-eprel 5561  df-fr 5614

This theorem is referenced by:  axunnd  10580