Theorem nfopdALT 39765

Description: Deduction version of bound-variable hypothesis builder nfop 4854. This shows how the deduction version of a not-free theorem such as nfop 4854 can be created from the corresponding not-free inference theorem. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nfopdALT.1	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)
nfopdALT.2	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfopdALT	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)

Proof of Theorem nfopdALT

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfopdALT.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)
2		nfopdALT.2	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)
3		abidnf 3665	. . . 4 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴)
4	3	adantr 485	. . 3 ⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) → {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴)
5		abidnf 3665	. . . 4 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 → {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵} = 𝐵)
6	5	adantl 486	. . 3 ⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) → {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵} = 𝐵)
7	4, 6	opeq12d 4846	. 2 ⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) → ⟨{𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}, {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵}⟩ = ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)
8		nfaba1 2933	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}
9		nfaba1 2933	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵}
10	8, 9	nfop 4854	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥⟨{𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}, {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵}⟩
11	1, 2, 7, 10	nfded2 39762	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 400  ∀wal 1568   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2143  {cab 2741  Ⅎwnfc 2910  ⟨cop 4595

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-11 2192  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-nf 1814  df-sb 2097  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-dif 3908  df-un 3910  df-ss 3922  df-nul 4287  df-if 4488  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596

This theorem is referenced by: (None)