Theorem nfopdALT 35500

Description: Deduction version of bound-variable hypothesis builder nfop 4687. This shows how the deduction version of a not-free theorem such as nfop 4687 can be created from the corresponding not-free inference theorem. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nfopdALT.1	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)
nfopdALT.2	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfopdALT	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)

Proof of Theorem nfopdALT

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfopdALT.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)
2		nfopdALT.2	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)
3		abidnf 3602	. . . 4 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴)
4	3	adantr 473	. . 3 ⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) → {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴)
5		abidnf 3602	. . . 4 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 → {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵} = 𝐵)
6	5	adantl 474	. . 3 ⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) → {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵} = 𝐵)
7	4, 6	opeq12d 4679	. 2 ⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) → ⟨{𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}, {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵}⟩ = ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)
8		nfaba1 2933	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}
9		nfaba1 2933	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵}
10	8, 9	nfop 4687	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥⟨{𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}, {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵}⟩
11	1, 2, 7, 10	nfded2 35497	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 387  ∀wal 1505   = wceq 1507   ∈ wcel 2048  {cab 2753  Ⅎwnfc 2910  ⟨cop 4441

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1758  ax-4 1772  ax-5 1869  ax-6 1928  ax-7 1964  ax-8 2050  ax-9 2057  ax-10 2077  ax-11 2091  ax-12 2104  ax-13 2299  ax-ext 2745

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 199  df-an 388  df-or 834  df-3an 1070  df-tru 1510  df-ex 1743  df-nf 1747  df-sb 2014  df-clab 2754  df-cleq 2765  df-clel 2840  df-nfc 2912  df-rab 3091  df-v 3411  df-dif 3828  df-un 3830  df-in 3832  df-ss 3839  df-nul 4174  df-if 4345  df-sn 4436  df-pr 4438  df-op 4442

This theorem is referenced by: (None)