Theorem nfopdALT 38927

Description: Deduction version of bound-variable hypothesis builder nfop 4913. This shows how the deduction version of a not-free theorem such as nfop 4913 can be created from the corresponding not-free inference theorem. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nfopdALT.1	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)
nfopdALT.2	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfopdALT	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)

Proof of Theorem nfopdALT

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfopdALT.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)
2		nfopdALT.2	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)
3		abidnf 3724	. . . 4 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴)
4	3	adantr 480	. . 3 ⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) → {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴)
5		abidnf 3724	. . . 4 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 → {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵} = 𝐵)
6	5	adantl 481	. . 3 ⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) → {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵} = 𝐵)
7	4, 6	opeq12d 4905	. 2 ⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) → ⟨{𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}, {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵}⟩ = ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)
8		nfaba1 2916	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}
9		nfaba1 2916	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵}
10	8, 9	nfop 4913	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥⟨{𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}, {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵}⟩
11	1, 2, 7, 10	nfded2 38924	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1535   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2108  {cab 2717  Ⅎwnfc 2893  ⟨cop 4654

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2711

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1778  df-nf 1782  df-sb 2065  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2819  df-nfc 2895  df-rab 3444  df-v 3490  df-dif 3979  df-un 3981  df-ss 3993  df-nul 4353  df-if 4549  df-sn 4649  df-pr 4651  df-op 4655

This theorem is referenced by: (None)