Theorem pm2.61da2ne 3035

Description: Deduction eliminating two inequalities in an antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2013.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
pm2.61da2ne.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → 𝜓)
pm2.61da2ne.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐷) → 𝜓)
pm2.61da2ne.3	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)) → 𝜓)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
pm2.61da2ne	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)

Proof of Theorem pm2.61da2ne

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		pm2.61da2ne.1	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → 𝜓)
2		pm2.61da2ne.2	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐷) → 𝜓)
3	2	adantlr 712	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐷) → 𝜓)
4		pm2.61da2ne.3	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)) → 𝜓)
5	4	anassrs 468	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷) → 𝜓)
6	3, 5	pm2.61dane 3034	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → 𝜓)
7	1, 6	pm2.61dane 3034	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 396   = wceq 1542   ≠ wne 2945

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-ne 2946

This theorem is referenced by:  pm2.61da3ne  3036  isabvd  20078  xrsxmet  23970  chordthmlem3  25982  mumul  26328  lgsdirnn0  26490  lgsdinn0  26491  lfl1dim  37131  lfl1dim2N  37132  pmodlem2  37857  cdlemg29  38715  cdlemg39  38726  cdlemg44b  38742  dia2dimlem9  39082  dihprrn  39436  dvh3dim  39456  lcfl9a  39515  lclkrlem2l  39528  lcfrlem42  39594  mapdh6kN  39756  hdmap1l6k  39830