Theorem rabeqf 3448

Description: Equality theorem for restricted class abstractions, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2004.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rabeqf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
rabeqf.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rabeqf	⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑})

Proof of Theorem rabeqf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rabeqf.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
2		rabeqf.2	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
3	1, 2	nfeq 2936	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 = 𝐵
4		eleq2 2850	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
5	4	anbi1d 642	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)))
6	3, 5	rabbida4 3439	1 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1568   ∈ wcel 2141  Ⅎwnfc 2908  {crab 3414

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1823  ax-4 1837  ax-5 1938  ax-6 1995  ax-7 2036  ax-8 2143  ax-9 2151  ax-10 2174  ax-11 2190  ax-12 2211  ax-ext 2733

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-tru 1571  df-ex 1808  df-nf 1812  df-sb 2095  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nfc 2910  df-rab 3415

This theorem is referenced by:  fpwrelmapffs  33045  rabeq12f  38752  issmfdf  47399  smfpimltmpt  47408  smfpimltxrmptf  47420  smfpimgtmpt  47443  smfpimgtxrmptf  47446  smfsupmpt  47477