Theorem rabeqf 3424

Description: Equality theorem for restricted class abstractions, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2004.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rabeqf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
rabeqf.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rabeqf	⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑})

Proof of Theorem rabeqf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rabeqf.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
2		rabeqf.2	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
3	1, 2	nfeq 2913	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 = 𝐵
4		eleq2 2826	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
5	4	anbi1d 632	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)))
6	3, 5	rabbida4 3415	1 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2114  Ⅎwnfc 2884  {crab 3390

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2185  ax-ext 2709

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-tru 1545  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2812  df-nfc 2886  df-rab 3391

This theorem is referenced by:  fpwrelmapffs  32826  rabeq12f  38498  issmfdf  47189  smfpimltmpt  47198  smfpimltxrmptf  47210  smfpimgtmpt  47233  smfpimgtxrmptf  47236  smfsupmpt  47267