Theorem rabeqf 3449

Description: Equality theorem for restricted class abstractions, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2004.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rabeqf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
rabeqf.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rabeqf	⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑})

Proof of Theorem rabeqf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rabeqf.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
2		rabeqf.2	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
3	1, 2	nfeq 2937	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 = 𝐵
4		eleq2 2851	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
5	4	anbi1d 642	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)))
6	3, 5	rabbida4 3440	1 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑})

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2142  Ⅎwnfc 2909  {crab 3415

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1824  ax-4 1838  ax-5 1939  ax-6 1996  ax-7 2037  ax-8 2144  ax-9 2152  ax-10 2175  ax-11 2191  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2734

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-tru 1572  df-ex 1809  df-nf 1813  df-sb 2096  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-rab 3416

This theorem is used by:  fpwrelmapffs  33090  rabeq12f  38834  issmfdf  47479  smfpimltmpt  47488  smfpimltxrmptf  47500  smfpimgtmpt  47523  smfpimgtxrmptf  47526  smfsupmpt  47557