Theorem rabeqf 3449

Description: Equality theorem for restricted class abstractions, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2004.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rabeqf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
rabeqf.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rabeqf	⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑})

Proof of Theorem rabeqf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rabeqf.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
2		rabeqf.2	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
3	1, 2	nfeq 2938	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 = 𝐵
4		eleq2 2852	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
5	4	anbi1d 640	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)))
6	3, 5	rabbida4 3440	1 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1561   ∈ wcel 2143  Ⅎwnfc 2910  {crab 3415

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1816  ax-4 1830  ax-5 1931  ax-6 1988  ax-7 2029  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-11 2192  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-or 859  df-tru 1564  df-ex 1801  df-nf 1805  df-sb 2092  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-rab 3416

This theorem is referenced by:  fpwrelmapffs  32942  rabeq12f  38661  issmfdf  47302  smfpimltmpt  47311  smfpimltxrmptf  47323  smfpimgtmpt  47346  smfpimgtxrmptf  47349  smfsupmpt  47380