Theorem rabeqf 3432

Description: Equality theorem for restricted class abstractions, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2004.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rabeqf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
rabeqf.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rabeqf	⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑})

Proof of Theorem rabeqf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rabeqf.1	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
2		rabeqf.2	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
3	1, 2	nfeq 2911	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 = 𝐵
4		eleq2 2824	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
5	4	anbi1d 632	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)))
6	3, 5	abbid 2803	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)})
7		df-rab 3399	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}
8		df-rab 3399	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)}
9	6, 7, 8	3eqtr4g 2795	1 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2114  {cab 2713  Ⅎwnfc 2882  {crab 3398

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2183  ax-ext 2707

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-tru 1545  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2714  df-cleq 2727  df-clel 2810  df-nfc 2884  df-rab 3399

This theorem is referenced by:  fpwrelmapffs  32792  rabeq12f  38327  issmfdf  47018  smfpimltmpt  47027  smfpimltxrmptf  47039  smfpimgtmpt  47062  smfpimgtxrmptf  47065  smfsupmpt  47096