Theorem rabeqf 3458

Description: Equality theorem for restricted class abstractions, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2004.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rabeqf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
rabeqf.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rabeqf	⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑})

Proof of Theorem rabeqf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rabeqf.1	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
2		rabeqf.2	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
3	1, 2	nfeq 2908	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 = 𝐵
4		eleq2 2814	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
5	4	anbi1d 629	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)))
6	3, 5	abbid 2795	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)})
7		df-rab 3425	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}
8		df-rab 3425	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)}
9	6, 7, 8	3eqtr4g 2789	1 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1533   ∈ wcel 2098  {cab 2701  Ⅎwnfc 2875  {crab 3424

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1789  ax-4 1803  ax-5 1905  ax-6 1963  ax-7 2003  ax-8 2100  ax-9 2108  ax-10 2129  ax-11 2146  ax-12 2163  ax-ext 2695

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 845  df-tru 1536  df-ex 1774  df-nf 1778  df-sb 2060  df-clab 2702  df-cleq 2716  df-clel 2802  df-nfc 2877  df-rab 3425

This theorem is referenced by:  fpwrelmapffs  32454  rabeq12f  37529  issmfdf  45999  smfpimltmpt  46008  smfpimltxrmptf  46020  smfpimgtmpt  46043  smfpimgtxrmptf  46046  smfsupmpt  46077  smfinfmpt  46081