Theorem cbvrabw 3437

Description: Rule to change the bound variable in a restricted class abstraction, using implicit substitution. Version of cbvrab 3438 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2379. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) (Revised by Gino Giotto, 10-Jan-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
cbvrabw.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
cbvrabw.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
cbvrabw.3	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
cbvrabw.4	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
cbvrabw.5	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cbvrabw	⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐴(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem cbvrabw

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfv 1915	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)
2		cbvrabw.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
3	2	nfcri 2943	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴
4		nfs1v 2157	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑
5	3, 4	nfan 1900	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑)
6		eleq1w 2872	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))
7		sbequ12 2250	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
8	6, 7	anbi12d 633	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑)))
9	1, 5, 8	cbvabw 2867	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} = {𝑧 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑)}
10		cbvrabw.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
11	10	nfcri 2943	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴
12		cbvrabw.3	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
13	12	nfsbv 2338	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦[𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑
14	11, 13	nfan 1900	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑)
15		nfv 1915	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)
16		eleq1w 2872	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
17		sbequ 2088	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
18		cbvrabw.4	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
19		cbvrabw.5	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
20	18, 19	sbiev 2322	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
21	17, 20	syl6bb 290	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
22	16, 21	anbi12d 633	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)))
23	14, 15, 22	cbvabw 2867	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)}
24	9, 23	eqtri 2821	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)}
25		df-rab 3115	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}
26		df-rab 3115	. 2 ⊢ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)}
27	24, 25, 26	3eqtr4i 2831	1 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 399   = wceq 1538  Ⅎwnf 1785  [wsb 2069   ∈ wcel 2111  {cab 2776  Ⅎwnfc 2936  {crab 3110

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2770

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-or 845  df-tru 1541  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2070  df-clab 2777  df-cleq 2791  df-clel 2870  df-nfc 2938  df-rab 3115

This theorem is referenced by:  elrabsf  3764  f1ossf1o  6867  tfis  7549  cantnflem1  9136  scottexs  9300  scott0s  9301  elmptrab  22432  bnj1534  32235  scottexf  35606  scott0f  35607  eq0rabdioph  39717  rexrabdioph  39735  rexfrabdioph  39736  elnn0rabdioph  39744  dvdsrabdioph  39751  binomcxplemdvsum  41059  fnlimcnv  42309  fnlimabslt  42321  stoweidlem34  42676  stoweidlem59  42701  pimltmnf2  43336  pimgtpnf2  43342  pimltpnf2  43348  issmff  43368  smfpimltxrmpt  43392  smfpreimagtf  43401  smflim  43410  smfpimgtxr  43413  smfpimgtxrmpt  43417  smflim2  43437  smflimsup  43459  smfliminf  43462