Theorem weeq12d 5648

Description: Equality deduction for well-orderings. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Jan-2015.) (Proof shortened by Matthew House, 10-Sep-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
weeq12d.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = 𝑆)
weeq12d.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
weeq12d	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 We 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 We 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem weeq12d

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		weeq12d.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = 𝑆)
2		weeq12d.2	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
3		weeq1 5646	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → (𝑅 We 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 We 𝐴))
4		weeq2 5647	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑆 We 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 We 𝐵))
5	3, 4	sylan9bb 509	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 = 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → (𝑅 We 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 We 𝐵))
6	1, 2, 5	syl2anc 584	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 We 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 We 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   = wceq 1540   We wwe 5610

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-ext 2708

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-ex 1780  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2810  df-ral 3053  df-rex 3062  df-ss 3948  df-br 5125  df-po 5566  df-so 5567  df-fr 5611  df-we 5613

This theorem is referenced by:  hartogslem1  9561  fpwwe2cbv  10649  fpwwe2lem2  10651  fpwwe2lem4  10653  fpwwecbv  10663  fpwwelem  10664  canthwelem  10669  canthwe  10670  pwfseqlem4  10681  fnwe2lem1  43041  aomclem1  43045  aomclem4  43048  aomclem5  43049  aomclem6  43050