| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 425 of 503) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-30989) |
(30990-32512) |
(32513-50280) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | hlhil0 42401 | The zero vector for the final constructed Hilbert space. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐿 = ((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((HLHil‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻)) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐿) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 = (0g‘𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | hlhillsm 42402 | The vector sum operation for the final constructed Hilbert space. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jun-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐿 = ((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((HLHil‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻)) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐿) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | hlhilocv 42403 | The orthocomplement for the final constructed Hilbert space. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jun-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐿 = ((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((HLHil‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻)) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝐿) & ⊢ 𝑁 = ((ocH‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (ocv‘𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ⊆ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑂‘𝑋) = (𝑁‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | hlhillcs 42404 | The closed subspaces of the final constructed Hilbert space. TODO: hlhilbase 42382 is applied over and over to conclusion rather than applied once to antecedent - would compressed proof be shorter if applied once to antecedent? (Contributed by NM, 23-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐼 = ((DIsoH‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((HLHil‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (ClSubSp‘𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = ran 𝐼) | ||
| Theorem | hlhilphllem 42405* | Lemma for hlhil 25410. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((HLHil‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻)) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐿 = ((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝐿) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐿) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝐿) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ ⨣ = (+g‘𝑅) & ⊢ × = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐿) & ⊢ , = (·𝑖‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐽 = ((HDMap‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((HGMap‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ ((𝐽‘𝑦)‘𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ PreHil) | ||
| Theorem | hlhilhillem 42406* | Lemma for hlhil 25410. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((HLHil‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻)) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐿 = ((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝐿) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐿) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝐿) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ ⨣ = (+g‘𝑅) & ⊢ × = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐿) & ⊢ , = (·𝑖‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐽 = ((HDMap‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((HGMap‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ ((𝐽‘𝑦)‘𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (ocv‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (ClSubSp‘𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ Hil) | ||
| Theorem | hlathil 42407 |
Construction of a Hilbert space (df-hil 21684) 𝑈 from a Hilbert
lattice (df-hlat 39797) 𝐾, where 𝑊 is a fixed but arbitrary
hyperplane (co-atom) in 𝐾.
The Hilbert space 𝑈 is identical to the vector space ((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑊) (see dvhlvec 41555) except that it is extended with involution and inner product components. The construction of these two components is provided by Theorem 3.6 in [Holland95] p. 13, whose proof we follow loosely. An example of involution is the complex conjugate when the division ring is the field of complex numbers. The nature of the division ring we constructed is indeterminate, however, until we specialize the initial Hilbert lattice with additional conditions found by Maria Solèr in 1995 and refined by René Mayet in 1998 that result in a division ring isomorphic to ℂ. See additional discussion at https://us.metamath.org/qlegif/mmql.html#what 41555. 𝑊 corresponds to the w in the proof of Theorem 13.4 of [Crawley] p. 111. Such a 𝑊 always exists since HL has lattice rank of at least 4 by df-hil 21684. It can be eliminated if we just want to show the existence of a Hilbert space, as is done in the literature. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((HLHil‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ Hil) | ||
| Syntax | ccsrg 42408 | Extend class notation with the class of all commutative semirings. |
| class CSRing | ||
| Definition | df-csring 42409 | Define the class of all commutative semirings. (Contributed by metakunt, 4-Apr-2025.) |
| ⊢ CSRing = {𝑓 ∈ SRing ∣ (mulGrp‘𝑓) ∈ CMnd} | ||
| Theorem | iscsrg 42410 | A commutative semiring is a semiring whose multiplication is a commutative monoid. (Contributed by metakunt, 4-Apr-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (mulGrp‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ CSRing ↔ (𝑅 ∈ SRing ∧ 𝐺 ∈ CMnd)) | ||
| Theorem | rhmzrhval 42411 | Evaluation of integers across a ring homomorphism. (Contributed by metakunt, 4-Jun-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 RingHom 𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (ℤRHom‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (ℤRHom‘𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘(𝑀‘𝑋)) = (𝑁‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | zndvdchrrhm 42412* | Construction of a ring homomorphism from ℤ/nℤ to 𝑅 when the characteristic of 𝑅 divides 𝑁. (Contributed by metakunt, 4-Jun-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Ring) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (chr‘𝑅) ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (chr‘𝑅) ∥ 𝑁) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑍) ↦ ∪ ((ℤRHom‘𝑅) “ 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑍 RingHom 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | relogbcld 42413 | Closure of the general logarithm with a positive real base on positive reals, a deduction version. (Contributed by metakunt, 22-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 1) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 logb 𝑋) ∈ ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | relogbexpd 42414 | Identity law for general logarithm: the logarithm of a power to the base is the exponent, a deduction version. (Contributed by metakunt, 22-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 1) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 logb (𝐵↑𝑀)) = 𝑀) | ||
| Theorem | relogbzexpd 42415 | Power law for the general logarithm for integer powers: The logarithm of a positive real number to the power of an integer is equal to the product of the exponent and the logarithm of the base of the power, a deduction version. (Contributed by metakunt, 22-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 1) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 logb (𝐶↑𝑁)) = (𝑁 · (𝐵 logb 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | logblebd 42416 | The general logarithm is monotone/increasing, a deduction version. (Contributed by metakunt, 22-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 2 ≤ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 logb 𝑋) ≤ (𝐵 logb 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | uzindd 42417* | Induction on the upper integers that start at 𝑀. The first four hypotheses give us the substitution instances we need; the following two are the basis and the induction step, a deduction version. (Contributed by metakunt, 8-Jun-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑀 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑗 = (𝑘 + 1) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑁 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜂)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ (𝑘 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑘)) → 𝜏) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂) | ||
| Theorem | fzadd2d 42418 | Membership of a sum in a finite interval of integers, a deduction version. (Contributed by metakunt, 10-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑂...𝑃)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 = (𝑀 + 𝑂)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = (𝑁 + 𝑃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 + 𝐾) ∈ (𝑄...𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | fzne2d 42419 | Elementhood in a finite set of sequential integers, except its upper bound. (Contributed by metakunt, 23-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ≠ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 < 𝑁) | ||
| Theorem | eqfnfv2d2 42420* | Equality of functions is determined by their values, a deduction version. (Contributed by metakunt, 28-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = 𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | fzsplitnd 42421 | Split a finite interval of integers into two parts. (Contributed by metakunt, 28-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀...𝑁) = ((𝑀...(𝐾 − 1)) ∪ (𝐾...𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | fzsplitnr 42422 | Split a finite interval of integers into two parts. (Contributed by metakunt, 28-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≤ 𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ≤ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀...𝑁) = ((𝑀...(𝐾 − 1)) ∪ (𝐾...𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | addassnni 42423 | Associative law for addition. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | addcomnni 42424 | Commutative law for addition. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | mulassnni 42425 | Associative law for multiplication. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | mulcomnni 42426 | Commutative law for multiplication. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 · 𝐵) = (𝐵 · 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | gcdcomnni 42427 | Commutative law for gcd. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ ⇒ ⊢ (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = (𝑁 gcd 𝑀) | ||
| Theorem | gcdnegnni 42428 | Negation invariance for gcd. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ ⇒ ⊢ (𝑀 gcd -𝑁) = (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) | ||
| Theorem | neggcdnni 42429 | Negation invariance for gcd. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ ⇒ ⊢ (-𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) | ||
| Theorem | bccl2d 42430 | Closure of the binomial coefficient, a deduction version. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ≤ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁C𝐾) ∈ ℕ) | ||
| Theorem | recbothd 42431 | Take reciprocal on both sides. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ≠ 0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 / 𝐵) = (𝐶 / 𝐷) ↔ (𝐵 / 𝐴) = (𝐷 / 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | gcdmultiplei 42432 | The GCD of a multiple of a positive integer is the positive integer itself. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ ⇒ ⊢ (𝑀 gcd (𝑀 · 𝑁)) = 𝑀 | ||
| Theorem | gcdaddmzz2nni 42433 | Adding a multiple of one operand of the gcd operator to the other does not alter the result. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐾 ∈ ℤ ⇒ ⊢ (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = (𝑀 gcd (𝑁 + (𝐾 · 𝑀))) | ||
| Theorem | gcdaddmzz2nncomi 42434 | Adding a multiple of one operand of the gcd operator to the other does not alter the result. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐾 ∈ ℤ ⇒ ⊢ (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = (𝑀 gcd ((𝐾 · 𝑀) + 𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | gcdnncli 42435 | Closure of the gcd operator. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ ⇒ ⊢ (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) ∈ ℕ | ||
| Theorem | muldvds1d 42436 | If a product divides an integer, so does one of its factors, a deduction version. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 · 𝑀) ∥ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∥ 𝑁) | ||
| Theorem | muldvds2d 42437 | If a product divides an integer, so does one of its factors, a deduction version. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 · 𝑀) ∥ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∥ 𝑁) | ||
| Theorem | nndivdvdsd 42438 | A positive integer divides a natural number if and only if the quotient is a positive integer, a deduction version of nndivdvds 16230. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 ∥ 𝑁 ↔ (𝑁 / 𝑀) ∈ ℕ)) | ||
| Theorem | nnproddivdvdsd 42439 | A product of natural numbers divides a natural number if and only if a factor divides the quotient, a deduction version. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐾 · 𝑀) ∥ 𝑁 ↔ 𝐾 ∥ (𝑁 / 𝑀))) | ||
| Theorem | coprmdvds2d 42440 | If an integer is divisible by two coprime integers, then it is divisible by their product, a deduction version. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 gcd 𝑀) = 1) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∥ 𝑁) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∥ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 · 𝑀) ∥ 𝑁) | ||
| Theorem | imadomfi 42441 | An image of a function under a finite set is dominated by the set. (Contributed by SN, 10-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ Fun 𝐹) → (𝐹 “ 𝐴) ≼ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | 12gcd5e1 42442 | The gcd of 12 and 5 is 1. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ (;12 gcd 5) = 1 | ||
| Theorem | 60gcd6e6 42443 | The gcd of 60 and 6 is 6. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ (;60 gcd 6) = 6 | ||
| Theorem | 60gcd7e1 42444 | The gcd of 60 and 7 is 1. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ (;60 gcd 7) = 1 | ||
| Theorem | 420gcd8e4 42445 | The gcd of 420 and 8 is 4. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ (;;420 gcd 8) = 4 | ||
| Theorem | lcmeprodgcdi 42446 | Calculate the least common multiple of two natural numbers. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = 𝐺 & ⊢ (𝐺 · 𝐻) = 𝐴 & ⊢ (𝑀 · 𝑁) = 𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑀 lcm 𝑁) = 𝐻 | ||
| Theorem | 12lcm5e60 42447 | The lcm of 12 and 5 is 60. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ (;12 lcm 5) = ;60 | ||
| Theorem | 60lcm6e60 42448 | The lcm of 60 and 6 is 60. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ (;60 lcm 6) = ;60 | ||
| Theorem | 60lcm7e420 42449 | The lcm of 60 and 7 is 420. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ (;60 lcm 7) = ;;420 | ||
| Theorem | 420lcm8e840 42450 | The lcm of 420 and 8 is 840. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ (;;420 lcm 8) = ;;840 | ||
| Theorem | lcmfunnnd 42451 | Useful equation to calculate the least common multiple of 1 to n. (Contributed by metakunt, 29-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (lcm‘(1...𝑁)) = ((lcm‘(1...(𝑁 − 1))) lcm 𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | lcm1un 42452 | Least common multiple of natural numbers up to 1 equals 1. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ (lcm‘(1...1)) = 1 | ||
| Theorem | lcm2un 42453 | Least common multiple of natural numbers up to 2 equals 2. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ (lcm‘(1...2)) = 2 | ||
| Theorem | lcm3un 42454 | Least common multiple of natural numbers up to 3 equals 6. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ (lcm‘(1...3)) = 6 | ||
| Theorem | lcm4un 42455 | Least common multiple of natural numbers up to 4 equals 12. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ (lcm‘(1...4)) = ;12 | ||
| Theorem | lcm5un 42456 | Least common multiple of natural numbers up to 5 equals 60. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ (lcm‘(1...5)) = ;60 | ||
| Theorem | lcm6un 42457 | Least common multiple of natural numbers up to 6 equals 60. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ (lcm‘(1...6)) = ;60 | ||
| Theorem | lcm7un 42458 | Least common multiple of natural numbers up to 7 equals 420. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ (lcm‘(1...7)) = ;;420 | ||
| Theorem | lcm8un 42459 | Least common multiple of natural numbers up to 8 equals 840. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ (lcm‘(1...8)) = ;;840 | ||
| Theorem | 3factsumint1 42460* | Move constants out of integrals or sums and/or commute sum and integral. (Contributed by metakunt, 26-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐿[,]𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐹 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐹) ∈ (𝐴–cn→ℂ)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐺 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐵)) → 𝐻 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐻) ∈ (𝐴–cn→ℂ)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∫𝐴Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐹 · (𝐺 · 𝐻)) d𝑥 = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 ∫𝐴(𝐹 · (𝐺 · 𝐻)) d𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | 3factsumint2 42461* | Move constants out of integrals or sums and/or commute sum and integral. (Contributed by metakunt, 26-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐹 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐺 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐵)) → 𝐻 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 ∫𝐴(𝐹 · (𝐺 · 𝐻)) d𝑥 = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 ∫𝐴(𝐺 · (𝐹 · 𝐻)) d𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | 3factsumint3 42462* | Move constants out of integrals or sums and/or commute sum and integral. (Contributed by metakunt, 26-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐿[,]𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐹 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐹) ∈ (𝐴–cn→ℂ)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐺 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐵)) → 𝐻 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐻) ∈ (𝐴–cn→ℂ)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 ∫𝐴(𝐺 · (𝐹 · 𝐻)) d𝑥 = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐺 · ∫𝐴(𝐹 · 𝐻) d𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | 3factsumint4 42463* | Move constants out of integrals or sums and/or commute sum and integral. (Contributed by metakunt, 26-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐹 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐺 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐵)) → 𝐻 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∫𝐴Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐹 · (𝐺 · 𝐻)) d𝑥 = ∫𝐴(𝐹 · Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐺 · 𝐻)) d𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | 3factsumint 42464* | Helpful equation for lcm inequality proof. (Contributed by metakunt, 26-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐿[,]𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐹) ∈ (𝐴–cn→ℂ)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐺 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐻) ∈ (𝐴–cn→ℂ)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∫𝐴(𝐹 · Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐺 · 𝐻)) d𝑥 = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐺 · ∫𝐴(𝐹 · 𝐻) d𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | resopunitintvd 42465 | Restrict continuous function on open unit interval. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (ℂ–cn→ℂ)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ (0(,)1) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ ((0(,)1)–cn→ℂ)) | ||
| Theorem | resclunitintvd 42466 | Restrict continuous function on closed unit interval. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (ℂ–cn→ℂ)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ (0[,]1) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ ((0[,]1)–cn→ℂ)) | ||
| Theorem | resdvopclptsd 42467* | Restrict derivative on unit interval. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (ℂ D (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ 𝐴)) = (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ 𝐵)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℂ) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℂ) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (ℝ D (𝑥 ∈ (0[,]1) ↦ 𝐴)) = (𝑥 ∈ (0(,)1) ↦ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem1 42468* | Part of lcm inequality lemma, this part eventually shows that F times the least common multiple of 1 to n is an integer. (Contributed by metakunt, 29-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = ∫(0[,]1)((𝑥↑(𝑀 − 1)) · ((1 − 𝑥)↑(𝑁 − 𝑀))) d𝑥 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = ∫(0[,]1)((𝑥↑(𝑀 − 1)) · Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 𝑀))(((-1↑𝑘) · ((𝑁 − 𝑀)C𝑘)) · (𝑥↑𝑘))) d𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem2 42469* | Part of lcm inequality lemma, this part eventually shows that F times the least common multiple of 1 to n is an integer. (Contributed by metakunt, 29-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = ∫(0[,]1)((𝑥↑(𝑀 − 1)) · ((1 − 𝑥)↑(𝑁 − 𝑀))) d𝑥 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 𝑀))(((-1↑𝑘) · ((𝑁 − 𝑀)C𝑘)) · ∫(0[,]1)((𝑥↑(𝑀 − 1)) · (𝑥↑𝑘)) d𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem3 42470* | Part of lcm inequality lemma, this part eventually shows that F times the least common multiple of 1 to n is an integer. (Contributed by metakunt, 30-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = ∫(0[,]1)((𝑥↑(𝑀 − 1)) · ((1 − 𝑥)↑(𝑁 − 𝑀))) d𝑥 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 𝑀))(((-1↑𝑘) · ((𝑁 − 𝑀)C𝑘)) · (1 / (𝑀 + 𝑘)))) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem4 42471 | Part of lcm inequality lemma, this part eventually shows that F times the least common multiple of 1 to n is an integer. F is found in lcmineqlem6 42473. (Contributed by metakunt, 10-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 𝑀))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lcm‘(1...𝑁)) / (𝑀 + 𝐾)) ∈ ℤ) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem5 42472 | Technical lemma for reciprocal multiplication in deduction form. (Contributed by metakunt, 10-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · (𝐵 · (1 / 𝐶))) = (𝐵 · (𝐴 / 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem6 42473* | Part of lcm inequality lemma, this part eventually shows that F times the least common multiple of 1 to n is an integer. (Contributed by metakunt, 10-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = ∫(0[,]1)((𝑥↑(𝑀 − 1)) · ((1 − 𝑥)↑(𝑁 − 𝑀))) d𝑥 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lcm‘(1...𝑁)) · 𝐹) ∈ ℤ) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem7 42474 | Derivative of 1-x for chain rule application. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (ℂ D (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ (1 − 𝑥))) = (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ -1) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem8 42475* | Derivative of (1-x)^(N-M). (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 < 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (ℂ D (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ ((1 − 𝑥)↑(𝑁 − 𝑀)))) = (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ (-(𝑁 − 𝑀) · ((1 − 𝑥)↑((𝑁 − 𝑀) − 1))))) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem9 42476* | (1-x)^(N-M) is continuous. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ ((1 − 𝑥)↑(𝑁 − 𝑀))) ∈ (ℂ–cn→ℂ)) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem10 42477* | Induction step of lcmineqlem13 42480 (deduction form). (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 < 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∫(0[,]1)((𝑥↑((𝑀 + 1) − 1)) · ((1 − 𝑥)↑(𝑁 − (𝑀 + 1)))) d𝑥 = ((𝑀 / (𝑁 − 𝑀)) · ∫(0[,]1)((𝑥↑(𝑀 − 1)) · ((1 − 𝑥)↑(𝑁 − 𝑀))) d𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem11 42478 | Induction step, continuation for binomial coefficients. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 < 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (1 / ((𝑀 + 1) · (𝑁C(𝑀 + 1)))) = ((𝑀 / (𝑁 − 𝑀)) · (1 / (𝑀 · (𝑁C𝑀))))) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem12 42479* | Base case for induction. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∫(0[,]1)((𝑡↑(1 − 1)) · ((1 − 𝑡)↑(𝑁 − 1))) d𝑡 = (1 / (1 · (𝑁C1)))) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem13 42480* | Induction proof for lcm integral. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = ∫(0[,]1)((𝑥↑(𝑀 − 1)) · ((1 − 𝑥)↑(𝑁 − 𝑀))) d𝑥 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (1 / (𝑀 · (𝑁C𝑀)))) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem14 42481 | Technical lemma for inequality estimate. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐶) ∥ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 · 𝐶) ∥ 𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∥ 𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 1) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) ∥ 𝐸) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem15 42482* | F times the least common multiple of 1 to n is a natural number. (Contributed by metakunt, 10-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = ∫(0[,]1)((𝑥↑(𝑀 − 1)) · ((1 − 𝑥)↑(𝑁 − 𝑀))) d𝑥 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lcm‘(1...𝑁)) · 𝐹) ∈ ℕ) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem16 42483 | Technical divisibility lemma. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 · (𝑁C𝑀)) ∥ (lcm‘(1...𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem17 42484 | Inequality of 2^{2n}. (Contributed by metakunt, 29-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (2↑(2 · 𝑁)) ≤ (((2 · 𝑁) + 1) · ((2 · 𝑁)C𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem18 42485 | Technical lemma to shift factors in binomial coefficient. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑁 + 1) · (((2 · 𝑁) + 1)C(𝑁 + 1))) = (((2 · 𝑁) + 1) · ((2 · 𝑁)C𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem19 42486 | Dividing implies inequality for lcm inequality lemma. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑁 · ((2 · 𝑁) + 1)) · ((2 · 𝑁)C𝑁)) ∥ (lcm‘(1...((2 · 𝑁) + 1)))) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem20 42487 | Inequality for lcm lemma. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 · (2↑(2 · 𝑁))) ≤ (lcm‘(1...((2 · 𝑁) + 1)))) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem21 42488 | The lcm inequality lemma without base cases 7 and 8. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 4 ≤ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (2↑((2 · 𝑁) + 2)) ≤ (lcm‘(1...((2 · 𝑁) + 1)))) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem22 42489 | The lcm inequality lemma without base cases 7 and 8. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 4 ≤ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((2↑((2 · 𝑁) + 1)) ≤ (lcm‘(1...((2 · 𝑁) + 1))) ∧ (2↑((2 · 𝑁) + 2)) ≤ (lcm‘(1...((2 · 𝑁) + 2))))) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem23 42490 | Penultimate step to the lcm inequality lemma. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 9 ≤ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (2↑𝑁) ≤ (lcm‘(1...𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem 42491 | The least common multiple inequality lemma, a central result for future use. Theorem 3.1 from https://www3.nd.edu/%7eandyp/notes/AKS.pdf (Contributed by metakunt, 16-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 7 ≤ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (2↑𝑁) ≤ (lcm‘(1...𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | 3exp7 42492 | 3 to the power of 7 equals 2187. (Contributed by metakunt, 21-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ (3↑7) = ;;;2187 | ||
| Theorem | 3lexlogpow5ineq1 42493 | First inequality in inequality chain, proposed by Mario Carneiro (Contributed by metakunt, 22-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ 9 < ((;11 / 7)↑5) | ||
| Theorem | 3lexlogpow5ineq2 42494 | Second inequality in inequality chain, proposed by Mario Carneiro. (Contributed by metakunt, 22-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 3 ≤ 𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((;11 / 7)↑5) ≤ ((2 logb 𝑋)↑5)) | ||
| Theorem | 3lexlogpow5ineq4 42495 | Sharper logarithm inequality chain. (Contributed by metakunt, 21-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 3 ≤ 𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 9 < ((2 logb 𝑋)↑5)) | ||
| Theorem | 3lexlogpow5ineq3 42496 | Combined inequality chain for a specific power of the binary logarithm, proposed by Mario Carneiro. (Contributed by metakunt, 22-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 3 ≤ 𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 7 < ((2 logb 𝑋)↑5)) | ||
| Theorem | 3lexlogpow2ineq1 42497 | Result for bound in AKS inequality lemma. (Contributed by metakunt, 21-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((3 / 2) < (2 logb 3) ∧ (2 logb 3) < (5 / 3)) | ||
| Theorem | 3lexlogpow2ineq2 42498 | Result for bound in AKS inequality lemma. (Contributed by metakunt, 21-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ (2 < ((2 logb 3)↑2) ∧ ((2 logb 3)↑2) < 3) | ||
| Theorem | 3lexlogpow5ineq5 42499 | Result for bound in AKS inequality lemma. (Contributed by metakunt, 21-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((2 logb 3)↑5) ≤ ;15 | ||
| Theorem | intlewftc 42500* | Inequality inference by invoking fundamental theorem of calculus. (Contributed by metakunt, 22-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ((𝐴[,]𝐵)–cn→ℝ)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ ((𝐴[,]𝐵)–cn→ℝ)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (ℝ D 𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 = (ℝ D 𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ((𝐴(,)𝐵)–cn→ℝ)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ((𝐴(,)𝐵)–cn→ℝ)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐿1) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝐿1) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴(,)𝐵) ↦ 𝑃)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴(,)𝐵) ↦ 𝑄)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴(,)𝐵)) → 𝑃 ≤ 𝑄) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐴) ≤ (𝐺‘𝐴)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐵) ≤ (𝐺‘𝐵)) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |