ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  abeq2 Unicode version

Theorem abeq2 2223
Description: Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (also called a class builder). Theorem 5.1 of [Quine] p. 34. This theorem shows the relationship between expressions with class abstractions and expressions with class variables. Note that abbi 2228 and its relatives are among those useful for converting theorems with class variables to equivalent theorems with wff variables, by first substituting a class abstraction for each class variable.

Class variables can always be eliminated from a theorem to result in an equivalent theorem with wff variables, and vice-versa. The idea is roughly as follows. To convert a theorem with a wff variable  ph (that has a free variable  x) to a theorem with a class variable  A, we substitute  x  e.  A for  ph throughout and simplify, where  A is a new class variable not already in the wff. Conversely, to convert a theorem with a class variable  A to one with  ph, we substitute  { x  |  ph } for  A throughout and simplify, where  x and  ph are new set and wff variables not already in the wff. For more information on class variables, see Quine pp. 15-21 and/or Takeuti and Zaring pp. 10-13. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)

Assertion
Ref Expression
abeq2  |-  ( A  =  { x  | 
ph }  <->  A. x
( x  e.  A  <->  ph ) )
Distinct variable group:    x, A
Allowed substitution hint:    ph( x)

Proof of Theorem abeq2
Dummy variable  y is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 ax-17 1489 . . 3  |-  ( y  e.  A  ->  A. x  y  e.  A )
2 hbab1 2104 . . 3  |-  ( y  e.  { x  | 
ph }  ->  A. x  y  e.  { x  |  ph } )
31, 2cleqh 2214 . 2  |-  ( A  =  { x  | 
ph }  <->  A. x
( x  e.  A  <->  x  e.  { x  | 
ph } ) )
4 abid 2103 . . . 4  |-  ( x  e.  { x  | 
ph }  <->  ph )
54bibi2i 226 . . 3  |-  ( ( x  e.  A  <->  x  e.  { x  |  ph }
)  <->  ( x  e.  A  <->  ph ) )
65albii 1429 . 2  |-  ( A. x ( x  e.  A  <->  x  e.  { x  |  ph } )  <->  A. x
( x  e.  A  <->  ph ) )
73, 6bitri 183 1  |-  ( A  =  { x  | 
ph }  <->  A. x
( x  e.  A  <->  ph ) )
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:    <-> wb 104   A.wal 1312    = wceq 1314    e. wcel 1463   {cab 2101
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-5 1406  ax-7 1407  ax-gen 1408  ax-ie1 1452  ax-ie2 1453  ax-8 1465  ax-11 1467  ax-4 1470  ax-17 1489  ax-i9 1493  ax-ial 1497  ax-i5r 1498  ax-ext 2097
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-nf 1420  df-sb 1719  df-clab 2102  df-cleq 2108  df-clel 2111
This theorem is referenced by:  abeq1  2224  abbi2i  2229  abbi2dv  2233  clabel  2240  sbabel  2281  rabid2  2581  ru  2877  sbcabel  2958  dfss2  3052  vpwex  4063  dmopab3  4712
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator