ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  abeq2 Unicode version

Theorem abeq2 2273
Description: Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (also called a class builder). Theorem 5.1 of [Quine] p. 34. This theorem shows the relationship between expressions with class abstractions and expressions with class variables. Note that abbi 2278 and its relatives are among those useful for converting theorems with class variables to equivalent theorems with wff variables, by first substituting a class abstraction for each class variable.

Class variables can always be eliminated from a theorem to result in an equivalent theorem with wff variables, and vice-versa. The idea is roughly as follows. To convert a theorem with a wff variable  ph (that has a free variable  x) to a theorem with a class variable  A, we substitute  x  e.  A for  ph throughout and simplify, where  A is a new class variable not already in the wff. Conversely, to convert a theorem with a class variable  A to one with  ph, we substitute  { x  |  ph } for  A throughout and simplify, where  x and  ph are new set and wff variables not already in the wff. For more information on class variables, see Quine pp. 15-21 and/or Takeuti and Zaring pp. 10-13. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)

Assertion
Ref Expression
abeq2  |-  ( A  =  { x  | 
ph }  <->  A. x
( x  e.  A  <->  ph ) )
Distinct variable group:    x, A
Allowed substitution hint:    ph( x)

Proof of Theorem abeq2
Dummy variable  y is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 ax-17 1513 . . 3  |-  ( y  e.  A  ->  A. x  y  e.  A )
2 hbab1 2153 . . 3  |-  ( y  e.  { x  | 
ph }  ->  A. x  y  e.  { x  |  ph } )
31, 2cleqh 2264 . 2  |-  ( A  =  { x  | 
ph }  <->  A. x
( x  e.  A  <->  x  e.  { x  | 
ph } ) )
4 abid 2152 . . . 4  |-  ( x  e.  { x  | 
ph }  <->  ph )
54bibi2i 226 . . 3  |-  ( ( x  e.  A  <->  x  e.  { x  |  ph }
)  <->  ( x  e.  A  <->  ph ) )
65albii 1457 . 2  |-  ( A. x ( x  e.  A  <->  x  e.  { x  |  ph } )  <->  A. x
( x  e.  A  <->  ph ) )
73, 6bitri 183 1  |-  ( A  =  { x  | 
ph }  <->  A. x
( x  e.  A  <->  ph ) )
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:    <-> wb 104   A.wal 1340    = wceq 1342    e. wcel 2135   {cab 2150
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-5 1434  ax-7 1435  ax-gen 1436  ax-ie1 1480  ax-ie2 1481  ax-8 1491  ax-11 1493  ax-4 1497  ax-17 1513  ax-i9 1517  ax-ial 1521  ax-i5r 1522  ax-ext 2146
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-nf 1448  df-sb 1750  df-clab 2151  df-cleq 2157  df-clel 2160
This theorem is referenced by:  abeq1  2274  abbi2i  2279  abbi2dv  2283  clabel  2291  sbabel  2333  rabid2  2640  ru  2945  sbcabel  3027  dfss2  3126  vpwex  4152  dmopab3  4811
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator