Theorem abssdv 3275

Description: Deduction of abstraction subclass from implication. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jan-2006.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
abssdv.1	|- ( ph -> ( ps -> x e. A ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
abssdv	|- ( ph -> { x | ps } C_ A )

Distinct variable groups:   ph, x   x, A

Allowed substitution hint:   ps( x)

Proof of Theorem abssdv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		abssdv.1	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( ps -> x e. A ) )
2	1	alrimiv 1898	. 2 |- ( ph -> A. x ( ps -> x e. A ) )
3		abss 3270	. 2 |- ( { x | ps } C_ A <-> A. x ( ps -> x e. A ) )
4	2, 3	sylibr 134	1 |- ( ph -> { x | ps } C_ A )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   A.wal 1371   e. wcel 2178   {cab 2193   C_ wss 3174

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 711  ax-5 1471  ax-7 1472  ax-gen 1473  ax-ie1 1517  ax-ie2 1518  ax-8 1528  ax-10 1529  ax-11 1530  ax-i12 1531  ax-bndl 1533  ax-4 1534  ax-17 1550  ax-i9 1554  ax-ial 1558  ax-i5r 1559  ax-ext 2189

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-nf 1485  df-sb 1787  df-clab 2194  df-cleq 2200  df-clel 2203  df-nfc 2339  df-in 3180  df-ss 3187

This theorem is referenced by:  fmpt  5753  tfrlemibacc  6435  tfrlemibfn  6437  tfr1onlembacc  6451  tfr1onlembfn  6453  tfrcllembacc  6464  tfrcllembfn  6466  eroprf  6738  genipv  7657  hashfacen  11018  4sqlemafi  12833  4sqlemffi  12834  4sqleminfi  12835  4sqlem11  12839  lss1d  14260  lspsn  14293  metrest  15093