Theorem abssdv 3231

Description: Deduction of abstraction subclass from implication. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jan-2006.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
abssdv.1	|- ( ph -> ( ps -> x e. A ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
abssdv	|- ( ph -> { x | ps } C_ A )

Distinct variable groups:   ph, x   x, A

Allowed substitution hint:   ps( x)

Proof of Theorem abssdv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		abssdv.1	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( ps -> x e. A ) )
2	1	alrimiv 1874	. 2 |- ( ph -> A. x ( ps -> x e. A ) )
3		abss 3226	. 2 |- ( { x | ps } C_ A <-> A. x ( ps -> x e. A ) )
4	2, 3	sylibr 134	1 |- ( ph -> { x | ps } C_ A )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   A.wal 1351   e. wcel 2148   {cab 2163   C_ wss 3131

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 709  ax-5 1447  ax-7 1448  ax-gen 1449  ax-ie1 1493  ax-ie2 1494  ax-8 1504  ax-10 1505  ax-11 1506  ax-i12 1507  ax-bndl 1509  ax-4 1510  ax-17 1526  ax-i9 1530  ax-ial 1534  ax-i5r 1535  ax-ext 2159

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-nf 1461  df-sb 1763  df-clab 2164  df-cleq 2170  df-clel 2173  df-nfc 2308  df-in 3137  df-ss 3144

This theorem is referenced by:  fmpt  5668  tfrlemibacc  6329  tfrlemibfn  6331  tfr1onlembacc  6345  tfr1onlembfn  6347  tfrcllembacc  6358  tfrcllembfn  6360  eroprf  6630  genipv  7510  hashfacen  10818  lss1d  13475  lspsn  13507  metrest  14091