Theorem abssdv 3244

Description: Deduction of abstraction subclass from implication. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jan-2006.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
abssdv.1	|- ( ph -> ( ps -> x e. A ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
abssdv	|- ( ph -> { x | ps } C_ A )

Distinct variable groups:   ph, x   x, A

Allowed substitution hint:   ps( x)

Proof of Theorem abssdv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		abssdv.1	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( ps -> x e. A ) )
2	1	alrimiv 1885	. 2 |- ( ph -> A. x ( ps -> x e. A ) )
3		abss 3239	. 2 |- ( { x | ps } C_ A <-> A. x ( ps -> x e. A ) )
4	2, 3	sylibr 134	1 |- ( ph -> { x | ps } C_ A )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   A.wal 1362   e. wcel 2160   {cab 2175   C_ wss 3144

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1458  ax-7 1459  ax-gen 1460  ax-ie1 1504  ax-ie2 1505  ax-8 1515  ax-10 1516  ax-11 1517  ax-i12 1518  ax-bndl 1520  ax-4 1521  ax-17 1537  ax-i9 1541  ax-ial 1545  ax-i5r 1546  ax-ext 2171

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-nf 1472  df-sb 1774  df-clab 2176  df-cleq 2182  df-clel 2185  df-nfc 2321  df-in 3150  df-ss 3157

This theorem is referenced by:  fmpt  5682  tfrlemibacc  6345  tfrlemibfn  6347  tfr1onlembacc  6361  tfr1onlembfn  6363  tfrcllembacc  6374  tfrcllembfn  6376  eroprf  6646  genipv  7526  hashfacen  10834  lss1d  13660  lspsn  13693  metrest  14403