Theorem cbvrabv 2619

Description: Rule to change the bound variable in a restricted class abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1999.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
cbvrabv.1	|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cbvrabv	|- { x e. A | ph } = { y e. A | ps }

Distinct variable groups:   x, y, A   ph, y   ps, x

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x)   ps( y)

Proof of Theorem cbvrabv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfcv 2229	. 2 |- F/_ x A
2		nfcv 2229	. 2 |- F/_ y A
3		nfv 1467	. 2 |- F/ y ph
4		nfv 1467	. 2 |- F/ x ps
5		cbvrabv.1	. 2 |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
6	1, 2, 3, 4, 5	cbvrab 2618	1 |- { x e. A | ph } = { y e. A | ps }

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   <-> wb 104   = wceq 1290   {crab 2364

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 666  ax-5 1382  ax-7 1383  ax-gen 1384  ax-ie1 1428  ax-ie2 1429  ax-8 1441  ax-10 1442  ax-11 1443  ax-i12 1444  ax-bndl 1445  ax-4 1446  ax-17 1465  ax-i9 1469  ax-ial 1473  ax-i5r 1474  ax-ext 2071

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-nf 1396  df-sb 1694  df-clab 2076  df-cleq 2082  df-clel 2085  df-nfc 2218  df-rab 2369

This theorem is referenced by:  pwnss  4000  acexmidlemv  5664  genipv  7129  ltexpri  7233  sqne2sq  11494