Theorem rabss 3260

Description: Restricted class abstraction in a subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-2006.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rabss	|- ( { x e. A | ph } C_ B <-> A. x e. A ( ph -> x e. B ) )

Distinct variable group:   x, B

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x)   A( x)

Proof of Theorem rabss

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-rab 2484	. . 3 |- { x e. A | ph } = { x | ( x e. A /\ ph ) }
2	1	sseq1i 3209	. 2 |- ( { x e. A | ph } C_ B <-> { x | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } C_ B )
3		abss 3252	. 2 |- ( { x | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } C_ B <-> A. x ( ( x e. A /\ ph ) -> x e. B ) )
4		impexp 263	. . . 4 |- ( ( ( x e. A /\ ph ) -> x e. B ) <-> ( x e. A -> ( ph -> x e. B ) ) )
5	4	albii 1484	. . 3 |- ( A. x ( ( x e. A /\ ph ) -> x e. B ) <-> A. x ( x e. A -> ( ph -> x e. B ) ) )
6		df-ral 2480	. . 3 |- ( A. x e. A ( ph -> x e. B ) <-> A. x ( x e. A -> ( ph -> x e. B ) ) )
7	5, 6	bitr4i 187	. 2 |- ( A. x ( ( x e. A /\ ph ) -> x e. B ) <-> A. x e. A ( ph -> x e. B ) )
8	2, 3, 7	3bitri 206	1 |- ( { x e. A | ph } C_ B <-> A. x e. A ( ph -> x e. B ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   <-> wb 105   A.wal 1362   e. wcel 2167   {cab 2182   A.wral 2475   {crab 2479   C_ wss 3157

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1461  ax-7 1462  ax-gen 1463  ax-ie1 1507  ax-ie2 1508  ax-8 1518  ax-10 1519  ax-11 1520  ax-i12 1521  ax-bndl 1523  ax-4 1524  ax-17 1540  ax-i9 1544  ax-ial 1548  ax-i5r 1549  ax-ext 2178

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-nf 1475  df-sb 1777  df-clab 2183  df-cleq 2189  df-clel 2192  df-nfc 2328  df-ral 2480  df-rab 2484  df-in 3163  df-ss 3170

This theorem is referenced by:  rabssdv  3263  dvdsssfz1  12017  phibndlem  12384  dfphi2  12388  mgmidsssn0  13027  istopon  14249  blsscls2  14729