Theorem regexmid 4351

Description: The axiom of foundation implies excluded middle.

By foundation (or regularity), we mean the principle that every inhabited set has an element which is minimal (when arranged by e.). The statement of foundation here is taken from Metamath Proof Explorer's ax-reg, and is identical (modulo one unnecessary quantifier) to the statement of foundation in Theorem "Foundation implies instances of EM" of [Crosilla], p. "Set-theoretic principles incompatible with intuitionistic logic".

For this reason, IZF does not adopt foundation as an axiom and instead replaces it with ax-setind 4353. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Sep-2019.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
regexmid.1	|- ( E. y y e. x -> E. y ( y e. x /\ A. z ( z e. y -> -. z e. x ) ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
regexmid	|- ( ph \/ -. ph )

Distinct variable group:   ph, x, y, z

Proof of Theorem regexmid

Dummy variable w is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqid 2088	. . 3 |- { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } = { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) }
2	1	regexmidlemm 4348	. 2 |- E. y y e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) }
3		pp0ex 4024	. . . 4 |- { (/) , { (/) } } e. _V
4	3	rabex 3983	. . 3 |- { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } e. _V
5		eleq2 2151	. . . . 5 |- ( x = { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } -> ( y e. x <-> y e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } ) )
6	5	exbidv 1753	. . . 4 |- ( x = { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } -> ( E. y y e. x <-> E. y y e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } ) )
7		eleq2 2151	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( x = { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } -> ( z e. x <-> z e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } ) )
8	7	notbid 627	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( x = { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } -> ( -. z e. x <-> -. z e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } ) )
9	8	imbi2d 228	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x = { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } -> ( ( z e. y -> -. z e. x ) <-> ( z e. y -> -. z e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } ) ) )
10	9	albidv 1752	. . . . . 6 |- ( x = { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } -> ( A. z ( z e. y -> -. z e. x ) <-> A. z ( z e. y -> -. z e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } ) ) )
11	5, 10	anbi12d 457	. . . . 5 |- ( x = { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } -> ( ( y e. x /\ A. z ( z e. y -> -. z e. x ) ) <-> ( y e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } /\ A. z ( z e. y -> -. z e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } ) ) ) )
12	11	exbidv 1753	. . . 4 |- ( x = { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } -> ( E. y ( y e. x /\ A. z ( z e. y -> -. z e. x ) ) <-> E. y ( y e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } /\ A. z ( z e. y -> -. z e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } ) ) ) )
13	6, 12	imbi12d 232	. . 3 |- ( x = { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } -> ( ( E. y y e. x -> E. y ( y e. x /\ A. z ( z e. y -> -. z e. x ) ) ) <-> ( E. y y e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } -> E. y ( y e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } /\ A. z ( z e. y -> -. z e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } ) ) ) ) )
14		regexmid.1	. . 3 |- ( E. y y e. x -> E. y ( y e. x /\ A. z ( z e. y -> -. z e. x ) ) )
15	4, 13, 14	vtocl 2673	. 2 |- ( E. y y e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } -> E. y ( y e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } /\ A. z ( z e. y -> -. z e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } ) ) )
16	1	regexmidlem1 4349	. 2 |- ( E. y ( y e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } /\ A. z ( z e. y -> -. z e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } ) ) -> ( ph \/ -. ph ) )
17	2, 15, 16	mp2b 8	1 |- ( ph \/ -. ph )

Syntax hints:   -. wn 3   -> wi 4   /\ wa 102   \/ wo 664   A.wal 1287   = wceq 1289   E.wex 1426   e. wcel 1438   {crab 2363   (/)c0 3286   {csn 3446   {cpr 3447

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-in1 579  ax-in2 580  ax-io 665  ax-5 1381  ax-7 1382  ax-gen 1383  ax-ie1 1427  ax-ie2 1428  ax-8 1440  ax-10 1441  ax-11 1442  ax-i12 1443  ax-bndl 1444  ax-4 1445  ax-14 1450  ax-17 1464  ax-i9 1468  ax-ial 1472  ax-i5r 1473  ax-ext 2070  ax-sep 3957  ax-nul 3965  ax-pow 4009

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-tru 1292  df-nf 1395  df-sb 1693  df-clab 2075  df-cleq 2081  df-clel 2084  df-nfc 2217  df-rab 2368  df-v 2621  df-dif 3001  df-un 3003  df-in 3005  df-ss 3012  df-nul 3287  df-pw 3431  df-sn 3452  df-pr 3453

This theorem is referenced by: (None)