Theorem regexmid 4657

Description: The axiom of foundation implies excluded middle.

By foundation (or regularity), we mean the principle that every inhabited set has an element which is minimal (when arranged by e.). The statement of foundation here is taken from Metamath Proof Explorer's ax-reg, and is identical (modulo one unnecessary quantifier) to the statement of foundation in Theorem "Foundation implies instances of EM" of [Crosilla], p. "Set-theoretic principles incompatible with intuitionistic logic".

For this reason, IZF does not adopt foundation as an axiom and instead replaces it with ax-setind 4659. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Sep-2019.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
regexmid.1	|- ( E. y y e. x -> E. y ( y e. x /\ A. z ( z e. y -> -. z e. x ) ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
regexmid	|- ( ph \/ -. ph )

Distinct variable group:   ph, x, y, z

Proof of Theorem regexmid

Dummy variable w is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqid 2232	. . 3 |- { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } = { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) }
2	1	regexmidlemm 4654	. 2 |- E. y y e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) }
3		pp0ex 4302	. . . 4 |- { (/) , { (/) } } e. _V
4	3	rabex 4256	. . 3 |- { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } e. _V
5		eleq2 2296	. . . . 5 |- ( x = { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } -> ( y e. x <-> y e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } ) )
6	5	exbidv 1874	. . . 4 |- ( x = { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } -> ( E. y y e. x <-> E. y y e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } ) )
7		eleq2 2296	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( x = { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } -> ( z e. x <-> z e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } ) )
8	7	notbid 673	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( x = { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } -> ( -. z e. x <-> -. z e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } ) )
9	8	imbi2d 230	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x = { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } -> ( ( z e. y -> -. z e. x ) <-> ( z e. y -> -. z e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } ) ) )
10	9	albidv 1873	. . . . . 6 |- ( x = { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } -> ( A. z ( z e. y -> -. z e. x ) <-> A. z ( z e. y -> -. z e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } ) ) )
11	5, 10	anbi12d 473	. . . . 5 |- ( x = { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } -> ( ( y e. x /\ A. z ( z e. y -> -. z e. x ) ) <-> ( y e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } /\ A. z ( z e. y -> -. z e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } ) ) ) )
12	11	exbidv 1874	. . . 4 |- ( x = { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } -> ( E. y ( y e. x /\ A. z ( z e. y -> -. z e. x ) ) <-> E. y ( y e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } /\ A. z ( z e. y -> -. z e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } ) ) ) )
13	6, 12	imbi12d 234	. . 3 |- ( x = { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } -> ( ( E. y y e. x -> E. y ( y e. x /\ A. z ( z e. y -> -. z e. x ) ) ) <-> ( E. y y e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } -> E. y ( y e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } /\ A. z ( z e. y -> -. z e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } ) ) ) ) )
14		regexmid.1	. . 3 |- ( E. y y e. x -> E. y ( y e. x /\ A. z ( z e. y -> -. z e. x ) ) )
15	4, 13, 14	vtocl 2869	. 2 |- ( E. y y e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } -> E. y ( y e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } /\ A. z ( z e. y -> -. z e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } ) ) )
16	1	regexmidlem1 4655	. 2 |- ( E. y ( y e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } /\ A. z ( z e. y -> -. z e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } ) ) -> ( ph \/ -. ph ) )
17	2, 15, 16	mp2b 8	1 |- ( ph \/ -. ph )

Syntax hints:   -. wn 3   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   \/ wo 716   A.wal 1396   = wceq 1398   E.wex 1541   e. wcel 2203   {crab 2524   (/)c0 3508   {csn 3689   {cpr 3690

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 619  ax-in2 620  ax-io 717  ax-5 1496  ax-7 1497  ax-gen 1498  ax-ie1 1542  ax-ie2 1543  ax-8 1553  ax-10 1554  ax-11 1555  ax-i12 1556  ax-bndl 1558  ax-4 1559  ax-17 1575  ax-i9 1579  ax-ial 1583  ax-i5r 1584  ax-14 2206  ax-ext 2214  ax-sep 4228  ax-nul 4236  ax-pow 4287

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1401  df-nf 1510  df-sb 1812  df-clab 2219  df-cleq 2225  df-clel 2228  df-nfc 2373  df-rab 2529  df-v 2815  df-dif 3213  df-un 3215  df-in 3217  df-ss 3224  df-nul 3509  df-pw 3671  df-sn 3695  df-pr 3696

This theorem is referenced by: (None)