Theorem regexmid 4633

Description: The axiom of foundation implies excluded middle.

By foundation (or regularity), we mean the principle that every inhabited set has an element which is minimal (when arranged by e.). The statement of foundation here is taken from Metamath Proof Explorer's ax-reg, and is identical (modulo one unnecessary quantifier) to the statement of foundation in Theorem "Foundation implies instances of EM" of [Crosilla], p. "Set-theoretic principles incompatible with intuitionistic logic".

For this reason, IZF does not adopt foundation as an axiom and instead replaces it with ax-setind 4635. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Sep-2019.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
regexmid.1	|- ( E. y y e. x -> E. y ( y e. x /\ A. z ( z e. y -> -. z e. x ) ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
regexmid	|- ( ph \/ -. ph )

Distinct variable group:   ph, x, y, z

Proof of Theorem regexmid

Dummy variable w is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqid 2231	. . 3 |- { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } = { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) }
2	1	regexmidlemm 4630	. 2 |- E. y y e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) }
3		pp0ex 4279	. . . 4 |- { (/) , { (/) } } e. _V
4	3	rabex 4234	. . 3 |- { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } e. _V
5		eleq2 2295	. . . . 5 |- ( x = { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } -> ( y e. x <-> y e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } ) )
6	5	exbidv 1873	. . . 4 |- ( x = { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } -> ( E. y y e. x <-> E. y y e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } ) )
7		eleq2 2295	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( x = { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } -> ( z e. x <-> z e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } ) )
8	7	notbid 673	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( x = { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } -> ( -. z e. x <-> -. z e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } ) )
9	8	imbi2d 230	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x = { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } -> ( ( z e. y -> -. z e. x ) <-> ( z e. y -> -. z e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } ) ) )
10	9	albidv 1872	. . . . . 6 |- ( x = { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } -> ( A. z ( z e. y -> -. z e. x ) <-> A. z ( z e. y -> -. z e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } ) ) )
11	5, 10	anbi12d 473	. . . . 5 |- ( x = { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } -> ( ( y e. x /\ A. z ( z e. y -> -. z e. x ) ) <-> ( y e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } /\ A. z ( z e. y -> -. z e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } ) ) ) )
12	11	exbidv 1873	. . . 4 |- ( x = { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } -> ( E. y ( y e. x /\ A. z ( z e. y -> -. z e. x ) ) <-> E. y ( y e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } /\ A. z ( z e. y -> -. z e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } ) ) ) )
13	6, 12	imbi12d 234	. . 3 |- ( x = { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } -> ( ( E. y y e. x -> E. y ( y e. x /\ A. z ( z e. y -> -. z e. x ) ) ) <-> ( E. y y e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } -> E. y ( y e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } /\ A. z ( z e. y -> -. z e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } ) ) ) ) )
14		regexmid.1	. . 3 |- ( E. y y e. x -> E. y ( y e. x /\ A. z ( z e. y -> -. z e. x ) ) )
15	4, 13, 14	vtocl 2858	. 2 |- ( E. y y e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } -> E. y ( y e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } /\ A. z ( z e. y -> -. z e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } ) ) )
16	1	regexmidlem1 4631	. 2 |- ( E. y ( y e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } /\ A. z ( z e. y -> -. z e. { w e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( w = { (/) } \/ ( w = (/) /\ ph ) ) } ) ) -> ( ph \/ -. ph ) )
17	2, 15, 16	mp2b 8	1 |- ( ph \/ -. ph )

Syntax hints:   -. wn 3   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   \/ wo 715   A.wal 1395   = wceq 1397   E.wex 1540   e. wcel 2202   {crab 2514   (/)c0 3494   {csn 3669   {cpr 3670

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 619  ax-in2 620  ax-io 716  ax-5 1495  ax-7 1496  ax-gen 1497  ax-ie1 1541  ax-ie2 1542  ax-8 1552  ax-10 1553  ax-11 1554  ax-i12 1555  ax-bndl 1557  ax-4 1558  ax-17 1574  ax-i9 1578  ax-ial 1582  ax-i5r 1583  ax-14 2205  ax-ext 2213  ax-sep 4207  ax-nul 4215  ax-pow 4264

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1400  df-nf 1509  df-sb 1811  df-clab 2218  df-cleq 2224  df-clel 2227  df-nfc 2363  df-rab 2519  df-v 2804  df-dif 3202  df-un 3204  df-in 3206  df-ss 3213  df-nul 3495  df-pw 3654  df-sn 3675  df-pr 3676

This theorem is referenced by: (None)