ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  regexmid GIF version

Theorem regexmid 4682
Description: The axiom of foundation implies excluded middle.

By foundation (or regularity), we mean the principle that every inhabited set has an element which is minimal (when arranged by ∈). The statement of foundation here is taken from Metamath Proof Explorer's ax-reg, and is identical (modulo one unnecessary quantifier) to the statement of foundation in Theorem "Foundation implies instances of EM" of [Crosilla], p. "Set-theoretic principles incompatible with intuitionistic logic".

For this reason, IZF does not adopt foundation as an axiom and instead replaces it with ax-setind 4684. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Sep-2019.)

Hypothesis
Ref Expression
regexmid.1 (∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)))
Assertion
Ref Expression
regexmid (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)
Distinct variable group:   𝜑,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧

Proof of Theorem regexmid
Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 eqid 2238 . . 3 {𝑤 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑤 = {∅} ∨ (𝑤 = ∅ ∧ 𝜑))} = {𝑤 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑤 = {∅} ∨ (𝑤 = ∅ ∧ 𝜑))}
21regexmidlemm 4679 . 2 ∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑤 = {∅} ∨ (𝑤 = ∅ ∧ 𝜑))}
3 pp0ex 4326 . . . 4 {∅, {∅}} ∈ V
43rabex 4280 . . 3 {𝑤 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑤 = {∅} ∨ (𝑤 = ∅ ∧ 𝜑))} ∈ V
5 eleq2 2302 . . . . 5 (𝑥 = {𝑤 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑤 = {∅} ∨ (𝑤 = ∅ ∧ 𝜑))} → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑤 = {∅} ∨ (𝑤 = ∅ ∧ 𝜑))}))
65exbidv 1878 . . . 4 (𝑥 = {𝑤 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑤 = {∅} ∨ (𝑤 = ∅ ∧ 𝜑))} → (∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑤 = {∅} ∨ (𝑤 = ∅ ∧ 𝜑))}))
7 eleq2 2302 . . . . . . . . 9 (𝑥 = {𝑤 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑤 = {∅} ∨ (𝑤 = ∅ ∧ 𝜑))} → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑤 = {∅} ∨ (𝑤 = ∅ ∧ 𝜑))}))
87notbid 677 . . . . . . . 8 (𝑥 = {𝑤 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑤 = {∅} ∨ (𝑤 = ∅ ∧ 𝜑))} → (¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑤 = {∅} ∨ (𝑤 = ∅ ∧ 𝜑))}))
98imbi2d 230 . . . . . . 7 (𝑥 = {𝑤 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑤 = {∅} ∨ (𝑤 = ∅ ∧ 𝜑))} → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑤 = {∅} ∨ (𝑤 = ∅ ∧ 𝜑))})))
109albidv 1877 . . . . . 6 (𝑥 = {𝑤 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑤 = {∅} ∨ (𝑤 = ∅ ∧ 𝜑))} → (∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑤 = {∅} ∨ (𝑤 = ∅ ∧ 𝜑))})))
115, 10anbi12d 477 . . . . 5 (𝑥 = {𝑤 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑤 = {∅} ∨ (𝑤 = ∅ ∧ 𝜑))} → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑤 = {∅} ∨ (𝑤 = ∅ ∧ 𝜑))} ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑤 = {∅} ∨ (𝑤 = ∅ ∧ 𝜑))}))))
1211exbidv 1878 . . . 4 (𝑥 = {𝑤 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑤 = {∅} ∨ (𝑤 = ∅ ∧ 𝜑))} → (∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑤 = {∅} ∨ (𝑤 = ∅ ∧ 𝜑))} ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑤 = {∅} ∨ (𝑤 = ∅ ∧ 𝜑))}))))
136, 12imbi12d 234 . . 3 (𝑥 = {𝑤 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑤 = {∅} ∨ (𝑤 = ∅ ∧ 𝜑))} → ((∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))) ↔ (∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑤 = {∅} ∨ (𝑤 = ∅ ∧ 𝜑))} → ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑤 = {∅} ∨ (𝑤 = ∅ ∧ 𝜑))} ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑤 = {∅} ∨ (𝑤 = ∅ ∧ 𝜑))})))))
14 regexmid.1 . . 3 (∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)))
154, 13, 14vtocl 2877 . 2 (∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑤 = {∅} ∨ (𝑤 = ∅ ∧ 𝜑))} → ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑤 = {∅} ∨ (𝑤 = ∅ ∧ 𝜑))} ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑤 = {∅} ∨ (𝑤 = ∅ ∧ 𝜑))})))
161regexmidlem1 4680 . 2 (∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑤 = {∅} ∨ (𝑤 = ∅ ∧ 𝜑))} ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑤 = {∅} ∨ (𝑤 = ∅ ∧ 𝜑))})) → (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑))
172, 15, 16mp2b 8 1 (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)
Colors of variables:    wff set class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ∨ wo 720  ∀wal 1400   = wceq 1402  ∃wex 1545   ∈ wcel 2209  {crab 2532  ∅c0 3520  {csn 3709  {cpr 3710
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 623  ax-in2 624  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-14 2212  ax-ext 2220  ax-sep 4249  ax-nul 4259  ax-pow 4311
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1405  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-rab 2537  df-v 2823  df-dif 3222  df-un 3224  df-in 3226  df-ss 3233  df-nul 3521  df-pw 3690  df-sn 3715  df-pr 3716
This theorem is used by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator