P. 46 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 4501-4600   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	reg3exmidlemwe 4501*	Lemma for reg3exmid 4502. Our counterexample A satisfies We. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Oct-2021.)
|- A = { x e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( x = { (/) } \/ ( x = (/) /\ ph ) ) }   =>    |- _E We A
Theorem	reg3exmid 4502*	If any inhabited set satisfying df-wetr 4264 for _E has a minimal element, excluded middle follows. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Oct-2021.)
|- ( ( _E We z /\ E. w w e. z ) -> E. x e. z A. y e. z x C_ y )   =>    |- ( ph \/ -. ph )
Theorem	dcextest 4503*	If it is decidable whether { x | ph } is a set, then -. ph is decidable (where x does not occur in ph). From this fact, we can deduce (outside the formal system, since we cannot quantify over classes) that if it is decidable whether any class is a set, then "weak excluded middle" (that is, any negated proposition -. ph is decidable) holds. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Jul-2022.)
|- DECID { x | ph } e. _V   =>    |- DECID -. ph
2.5.3  Transfinite induction
Theorem	tfi 4504*	The Principle of Transfinite Induction. Theorem 7.17 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 39. This principle states that if A is a class of ordinal numbers with the property that every ordinal number included in A also belongs to A, then every ordinal number is in A. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2004.)
|- ( ( A C_ On /\ A. x e. On ( x C_ A -> x e. A ) ) -> A = On )
Theorem	tfis 4505*	Transfinite Induction Schema. If all ordinal numbers less than a given number x have a property (induction hypothesis), then all ordinal numbers have the property (conclusion). Exercise 25 of [Enderton] p. 200. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Nov-2016.)
|- ( x e. On -> ( A. y e. x [ y / x ] ph -> ph ) )   =>    |- ( x e. On -> ph )
Theorem	tfis2f 4506*	Transfinite Induction Schema, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1994.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x e. On -> ( A. y e. x ps -> ph ) )   =>    |- ( x e. On -> ph )
Theorem	tfis2 4507*	Transfinite Induction Schema, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1994.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x e. On -> ( A. y e. x ps -> ph ) )   =>    |- ( x e. On -> ph )
Theorem	tfis3 4508*	Transfinite Induction Schema, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2003.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x e. On -> ( A. y e. x ps -> ph ) )   =>    |- ( A e. On -> ch )
Theorem	tfisi 4509*	A transfinite induction scheme in "implicit" form where the induction is done on an object derived from the object of interest. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Aug-2015.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> T e. On )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( R e. On /\ R C_ T ) /\ A. y ( S e. R -> ch ) ) -> ps )   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ps <-> th ) )   &    |- ( x = y -> R = S )   &    |- ( x = A -> R = T )   =>    |- ( ph -> th )
2.6  IZF Set Theory - add the Axiom of Infinity
2.6.1  Introduce the Axiom of Infinity
Axiom	ax-iinf 4510*	Axiom of Infinity. Axiom 5 of [Crosilla] p. "Axioms of CZF and IZF". (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Nov-2018.)
|- E. x ( (/) e. x /\ A. y ( y e. x -> suc y e. x ) )
Theorem	zfinf2 4511*	A standard version of the Axiom of Infinity, using definitions to abbreviate. Axiom Inf of [BellMachover] p. 472. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-1993.)
|- E. x ( (/) e. x /\ A. y e. x suc y e. x )
2.6.2  The natural numbers
Syntax	com 4512	Extend class notation to include the class of natural numbers.
class om
Definition	df-iom 4513*	Define the class of natural numbers as the smallest inductive set, which is valid provided we assume the Axiom of Infinity. Definition 6.3 of [Eisenberg] p. 82. Note: the natural numbers om are a subset of the ordinal numbers df-on 4298. Later, when we define complex numbers, we will be able to also define a subset of the complex numbers (df-inn 8745) with analogous properties and operations, but they will be different sets. We are unable to use the terms finite ordinal and natural number interchangeably, as shown at exmidonfin 7067. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-1994.) Use its alias dfom3 4514 instead for naming consistency with set.mm. (New usage is discouraged.)
|- om = |^| { x | ( (/) e. x /\ A. y e. x suc y e. x ) }
Theorem	dfom3 4514*	Alias for df-iom 4513. Use it instead of df-iom 4513 for naming consistency with set.mm. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-1994.)
|- om = |^| { x | ( (/) e. x /\ A. y e. x suc y e. x ) }
Theorem	omex 4515	The existence of omega (the class of natural numbers). Axiom 7 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 43. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-1994.)
|- om e. _V
2.6.3  Peano's postulates
Theorem	peano1 4516	Zero is a natural number. One of Peano's five postulates for arithmetic. Proposition 7.30(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 42. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1994.)
|- (/) e. om
Theorem	peano2 4517	The successor of any natural number is a natural number. One of Peano's five postulates for arithmetic. Proposition 7.30(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 42. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2003.)
|- ( A e. om -> suc A e. om )
Theorem	peano3 4518	The successor of any natural number is not zero. One of Peano's five postulates for arithmetic. Proposition 7.30(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 42. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2003.)
|- ( A e. om -> suc A =/= (/) )
Theorem	peano4 4519	Two natural numbers are equal iff their successors are equal, i.e. the successor function is one-to-one. One of Peano's five postulates for arithmetic. Proposition 7.30(4) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 43. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2003.)
|- ( ( A e. om /\ B e. om ) -> ( suc A = suc B <-> A = B ) )
Theorem	peano5 4520*	The induction postulate: any class containing zero and closed under the successor operation contains all natural numbers. One of Peano's five postulates for arithmetic. Proposition 7.30(5) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 43. The more traditional statement of mathematical induction as a theorem schema, with a basis and an induction step, is derived from this theorem as theorem findes 4525. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2004.)
|- ( ( (/) e. A /\ A. x e. om ( x e. A -> suc x e. A ) ) -> om C_ A )
2.6.4  Finite induction (for finite ordinals)
Theorem	find 4521*	The Principle of Finite Induction (mathematical induction). Corollary 7.31 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 43. The simpler hypothesis shown here was suggested in an email from "Colin" on 1-Oct-2001. The hypothesis states that A is a set of natural numbers, zero belongs to A, and given any member of A the member's successor also belongs to A. The conclusion is that every natural number is in A. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
|- ( A C_ om /\ (/) e. A /\ A. x e. A suc x e. A )   =>    |- A = om
Theorem	finds 4522*	Principle of Finite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first four hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last two are the basis and the induction step. Theorem Schema 22 of [Suppes] p. 136. This is Metamath 100 proof #74. (Contributed by NM, 14-Apr-1995.)
|- ( x = (/) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = suc y -> ( ph <-> th ) )   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ta ) )   &    |- ps   &    |- ( y e. om -> ( ch -> th ) )   =>    |- ( A e. om -> ta )
Theorem	finds2 4523*	Principle of Finite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first three hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last two are the basis and the induction step. Theorem Schema 22 of [Suppes] p. 136. (Contributed by NM, 29-Nov-2002.)
|- ( x = (/) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = suc y -> ( ph <-> th ) )   &    |- ( ta -> ps )   &    |- ( y e. om -> ( ta -> ( ch -> th ) ) )   =>    |- ( x e. om -> ( ta -> ph ) )
Theorem	finds1 4524*	Principle of Finite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first three hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last two are the basis and the induction step. Theorem Schema 22 of [Suppes] p. 136. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-2006.)
|- ( x = (/) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = suc y -> ( ph <-> th ) )   &    |- ps   &    |- ( y e. om -> ( ch -> th ) )   =>    |- ( x e. om -> ph )
Theorem	findes 4525	Finite induction with explicit substitution. The first hypothesis is the basis and the second is the induction step. Theorem Schema 22 of [Suppes] p. 136. This is an alternative for Metamath 100 proof #74. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 9-Jul-2003.)
|- [. (/) / x ]. ph   &    |- ( x e. om -> ( ph -> [. suc x / x ]. ph ) )   =>    |- ( x e. om -> ph )
2.6.5  The Natural Numbers (continued)
Theorem	nn0suc 4526*	A natural number is either 0 or a successor. Similar theorems for arbitrary sets or real numbers will not be provable (without the law of the excluded middle), but equality of natural numbers is decidable. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.)
|- ( A e. om -> ( A = (/) \/ E. x e. om A = suc x ) )
Theorem	elnn 4527	A member of a natural number is a natural number. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1998.)
|- ( ( A e. B /\ B e. om ) -> A e. om )
Theorem	ordom 4528	Omega is ordinal. Theorem 7.32 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 43. (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-1995.)
|- Ord om
Theorem	omelon2 4529	Omega is an ordinal number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Jan-2013.)
|- ( om e. _V -> om e. On )
Theorem	omelon 4530	Omega is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Jan-2013.)
|- om e. On
Theorem	nnon 4531	A natural number is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jun-1994.)
|- ( A e. om -> A e. On )
Theorem	nnoni 4532	A natural number is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jun-1994.)
|- A e. om   =>    |- A e. On
Theorem	nnord 4533	A natural number is ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-1995.)
|- ( A e. om -> Ord A )
Theorem	omsson 4534	Omega is a subset of On. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-1994.)
|- om C_ On
Theorem	limom 4535	Omega is a limit ordinal. Theorem 2.8 of [BellMachover] p. 473. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-1995.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 5-Jan-2019.)
|- Lim om
Theorem	peano2b 4536	A class belongs to omega iff its successor does. (Contributed by NM, 3-Dec-1995.)
|- ( A e. om <-> suc A e. om )
Theorem	nnsuc 4537*	A nonzero natural number is a successor. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2004.)
|- ( ( A e. om /\ A =/= (/) ) -> E. x e. om A = suc x )
Theorem	nnsucpred 4538	The successor of the precedessor of a nonzero natural number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Jul-2022.)
|- ( ( A e. om /\ A =/= (/) ) -> suc U. A = A )
Theorem	nndceq0 4539	A natural number is either zero or nonzero. Decidable equality for natural numbers is a special case of the law of the excluded middle which holds in most constructive set theories including ours. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Jan-2019.)
|- ( A e. om -> DECID A = (/) )
Theorem	0elnn 4540	A natural number is either the empty set or has the empty set as an element. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Aug-2019.)
|- ( A e. om -> ( A = (/) \/ (/) e. A ) )
Theorem	nn0eln0 4541	A natural number is nonempty iff it contains the empty set. Although in constructive mathematics it is generally more natural to work with inhabited sets and ignore the whole concept of nonempty sets, in the specific case of natural numbers this theorem may be helpful in converting proofs which were written assuming excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Aug-2019.)
|- ( A e. om -> ( (/) e. A <-> A =/= (/) ) )
Theorem	nnregexmid 4542*	If inhabited sets of natural numbers always have minimal elements, excluded middle follows. The argument is essentially the same as regexmid 4458 and the larger lesson is that although natural numbers may behave "non-constructively" even in a constructive set theory (for example see nndceq 6403 or nntri3or 6397), sets of natural numbers are a different animal. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Sep-2019.)
|- ( ( x C_ om /\ E. y y e. x ) -> E. y ( y e. x /\ A. z ( z e. y -> -. z e. x ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph \/ -. ph )
Theorem	omsinds 4543*	Strong (or "total") induction principle over om. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Jul-2015.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x e. om -> ( A. y e. x ps -> ph ) )   =>    |- ( A e. om -> ch )
Theorem	nnpredcl 4544	The predecessor of a natural number is a natural number. This theorem is most interesting when the natural number is a successor (as seen in theorems like onsucuni2 4487) but also holds when it is (/) by uni0 3771. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Jul-2022.)
|- ( A e. om -> U. A e. om )
2.6.6  Relations
Syntax	cxp 4545	Extend the definition of a class to include the cross product.
class ( A X. B )
Syntax	ccnv 4546	Extend the definition of a class to include the converse of a class.
class `' A
Syntax	cdm 4547	Extend the definition of a class to include the domain of a class.
class dom A
Syntax	crn 4548	Extend the definition of a class to include the range of a class.
class ran A
Syntax	cres 4549	Extend the definition of a class to include the restriction of a class. (Read: The restriction of A to B.)
class ( A |` B )
Syntax	cima 4550	Extend the definition of a class to include the image of a class. (Read: The image of B under A.)
class ( A " B )
Syntax	ccom 4551	Extend the definition of a class to include the composition of two classes. (Read: The composition of A and B.)
class ( A o. B )
Syntax	wrel 4552	Extend the definition of a wff to include the relation predicate. (Read: A is a relation.)
wff Rel A
Definition	df-xp 4553*	Define the cross product of two classes. Definition 9.11 of [Quine] p. 64. For example, ( { 1 , 5 } X. { 2 , 7 } ) = ( { <. 1 , 2 >., <. 1 , 7 >. } u. { <. 5 , 2 >., <. 5 , 7 >. } ) . Another example is that the set of rational numbers are defined in using the cross-product ( Z X. N ) ; the left- and right-hand sides of the cross-product represent the top (integer) and bottom (natural) numbers of a fraction. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-1994.)
|- ( A X. B ) = { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) }
Definition	df-rel 4554	Define the relation predicate. Definition 6.4(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 23. For alternate definitions, see dfrel2 4997 and dfrel3 5004. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
|- ( Rel A <-> A C_ ( _V X. _V ) )
Definition	df-cnv 4555*	Define the converse of a class. Definition 9.12 of [Quine] p. 64. The converse of a binary relation swaps its arguments, i.e., if A e. _V and B e. _V then ( A `' R B <-> B R A ), as proven in brcnv 4730 (see df-br 3938 and df-rel 4554 for more on relations). For example, `' { <. 2 , 6 >., <. 3 , 9 >. } = { <. 6 , 2 >., <. 9 , 3 >. } . We use Quine's breve accent (smile) notation. Like Quine, we use it as a prefix, which eliminates the need for parentheses. Many authors use the postfix superscript "to the minus one." "Converse" is Quine's terminology; some authors call it "inverse," especially when the argument is a function. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-1994.)
|- `' A = { <. x , y >. | y A x }
Definition	df-co 4556*	Define the composition of two classes. Definition 6.6(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 24. Note that Definition 7 of [Suppes] p. 63 reverses A and B, uses a slash instead of o., and calls the operation "relative product." (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-1994.)
|- ( A o. B ) = { <. x , y >. | E. z ( x B z /\ z A y ) }
Definition	df-dm 4557*	Define the domain of a class. Definition 3 of [Suppes] p. 59. For example, F = { <. 2 , 6 >., <. 3 , 9 >. } -> dom F = { 2 , 3 } . Contrast with range (defined in df-rn 4558). For alternate definitions see dfdm2 5081, dfdm3 4734, and dfdm4 4739. The notation " dom " is used by Enderton; other authors sometimes use script D. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
|- dom A = { x | E. y x A y }
Definition	df-rn 4558	Define the range of a class. For example, F = { <. 2 , 6 >., <. 3 , 9 >. } -> ran F = { 6 , 9 } . Contrast with domain (defined in df-dm 4557). For alternate definitions, see dfrn2 4735, dfrn3 4736, and dfrn4 5007. The notation " ran " is used by Enderton; other authors sometimes use script R or script W. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
|- ran A = dom `' A
Definition	df-res 4559	Define the restriction of a class. Definition 6.6(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 24. For example ( F = { <. 2 , 6 >., <. 3 , 9 >. } /\ B = { 1 , 2 } ) -> ( F |` B ) = { <. 2 , 6 >. } . (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-1994.)
|- ( A |` B ) = ( A i^i ( B X. _V ) )
Definition	df-ima 4560	Define the image of a class (as restricted by another class). Definition 6.6(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 24. For example, ( F = { <. 2 , 6 >., <. 3 , 9 >. } /\ B = { 1 , 2 } ) -> ( F " B ) = { 6 } . Contrast with restriction (df-res 4559) and range (df-rn 4558). For an alternate definition, see dfima2 4891. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-1994.)
|- ( A " B ) = ran ( A |` B )
Theorem	xpeq1 4561	Equality theorem for cross product. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-1994.)
|- ( A = B -> ( A X. C ) = ( B X. C ) )
Theorem	xpeq2 4562	Equality theorem for cross product. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jul-1994.)
|- ( A = B -> ( C X. A ) = ( C X. B ) )
Theorem	elxpi 4563*	Membership in a cross product. Uses fewer axioms than elxp 4564. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-1994.)
|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) -> E. x E. y ( A = <. x , y >. /\ ( x e. B /\ y e. C ) ) )
Theorem	elxp 4564*	Membership in a cross product. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-1994.)
|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) <-> E. x E. y ( A = <. x , y >. /\ ( x e. B /\ y e. C ) ) )
Theorem	elxp2 4565*	Membership in a cross product. (Contributed by NM, 23-Feb-2004.)
|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) <-> E. x e. B E. y e. C A = <. x , y >. )
Theorem	xpeq12 4566	Equality theorem for cross product. (Contributed by FL, 31-Aug-2009.)
|- ( ( A = B /\ C = D ) -> ( A X. C ) = ( B X. D ) )
Theorem	xpeq1i 4567	Equality inference for cross product. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2008.)
|- A = B   =>    |- ( A X. C ) = ( B X. C )
Theorem	xpeq2i 4568	Equality inference for cross product. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2008.)
|- A = B   =>    |- ( C X. A ) = ( C X. B )
Theorem	xpeq12i 4569	Equality inference for cross product. (Contributed by FL, 31-Aug-2009.)
|- A = B   &    |- C = D   =>    |- ( A X. C ) = ( B X. D )
Theorem	xpeq1d 4570	Equality deduction for cross product. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 17-Jun-2010.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A X. C ) = ( B X. C ) )
Theorem	xpeq2d 4571	Equality deduction for cross product. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 17-Jun-2010.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( C X. A ) = ( C X. B ) )
Theorem	xpeq12d 4572	Equality deduction for Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> C = D )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A X. C ) = ( B X. D ) )
Theorem	sqxpeqd 4573	Equality deduction for a Cartesian square, see Wikipedia "Cartesian product", https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartesian_product#n-ary_Cartesian_power. (Contributed by AV, 13-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A X. A ) = ( B X. B ) )
Theorem	nfxp 4574	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for cross product. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ x B   =>    |- F/_ x ( A X. B )
Theorem	0nelxp 4575	The empty set is not a member of a cross product. (Contributed by NM, 2-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- -. (/) e. ( A X. B )
Theorem	0nelelxp 4576	A member of a cross product (ordered pair) doesn't contain the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 15-Dec-2008.)
|- ( C e. ( A X. B ) -> -. (/) e. C )
Theorem	opelxp 4577	Ordered pair membership in a cross product. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( <. A , B >. e. ( C X. D ) <-> ( A e. C /\ B e. D ) )
Theorem	brxp 4578	Binary relation on a cross product. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2004.)
|- ( A ( C X. D ) B <-> ( A e. C /\ B e. D ) )
Theorem	opelxpi 4579	Ordered pair membership in a cross product (implication). (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.)
|- ( ( A e. C /\ B e. D ) -> <. A , B >. e. ( C X. D ) )
Theorem	opelxpd 4580	Ordered pair membership in a Cartesian product, deduction form. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 3-Mar-2021.)
|- ( ph -> A e. C )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. D )   =>    |- ( ph -> <. A , B >. e. ( C X. D ) )
Theorem	opelxp1 4581	The first member of an ordered pair of classes in a cross product belongs to first cross product argument. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( <. A , B >. e. ( C X. D ) -> A e. C )
Theorem	opelxp2 4582	The second member of an ordered pair of classes in a cross product belongs to second cross product argument. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( <. A , B >. e. ( C X. D ) -> B e. D )
Theorem	otelxp1 4583	The first member of an ordered triple of classes in a cross product belongs to first cross product argument. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-2008.)
|- ( <. <. A , B >. , C >. e. ( ( R X. S ) X. T ) -> A e. R )
Theorem	rabxp 4584*	Membership in a class builder restricted to a cross product. (Contributed by NM, 20-Feb-2014.)
|- ( x = <. y , z >. -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- { x e. ( A X. B ) | ph } = { <. y , z >. | ( y e. A /\ z e. B /\ ps ) }
Theorem	brrelex12 4585	A true binary relation on a relation implies the arguments are sets. (This is a property of our ordered pair definition.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( ( Rel R /\ A R B ) -> ( A e. _V /\ B e. _V ) )
Theorem	brrelex1 4586	A true binary relation on a relation implies the first argument is a set. (This is a property of our ordered pair definition.) (Contributed by NM, 18-May-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( ( Rel R /\ A R B ) -> A e. _V )
Theorem	brrelex 4587	A true binary relation on a relation implies the first argument is a set. (This is a property of our ordered pair definition.) (Contributed by NM, 18-May-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( ( Rel R /\ A R B ) -> A e. _V )
Theorem	brrelex2 4588	A true binary relation on a relation implies the second argument is a set. (This is a property of our ordered pair definition.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( ( Rel R /\ A R B ) -> B e. _V )
Theorem	brrelex12i 4589	Two classes that are related by a binary relation are sets. (An artifact of our ordered pair definition.) (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2022.)
|- Rel R   =>    |- ( A R B -> ( A e. _V /\ B e. _V ) )
Theorem	brrelex1i 4590	The first argument of a binary relation exists. (An artifact of our ordered pair definition.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-1998.)
|- Rel R   =>    |- ( A R B -> A e. _V )
Theorem	brrelex2i 4591	The second argument of a binary relation exists. (An artifact of our ordered pair definition.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- Rel R   =>    |- ( A R B -> B e. _V )
Theorem	nprrel 4592	No proper class is related to anything via any relation. (Contributed by Roy F. Longton, 30-Jul-2005.)
|- Rel R   &    |- -. A e. _V   =>    |- -. A R B
Theorem	0nelrel 4593	A binary relation does not contain the empty set. (Contributed by AV, 15-Nov-2021.)
|- ( Rel R -> (/) e/ R )
Theorem	fconstmpt 4594*	Representation of a constant function using the mapping operation. (Note that x cannot appear free in B.) (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2013.)
|- ( A X. { B } ) = ( x e. A |-> B )
Theorem	vtoclr 4595*	Variable to class conversion of transitive relation. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- Rel R   &    |- ( ( x R y /\ y R z ) -> x R z )   =>    |- ( ( A R B /\ B R C ) -> A R C )
Theorem	opelvvg 4596	Ordered pair membership in the universal class of ordered pairs. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> <. A , B >. e. ( _V X. _V ) )
Theorem	opelvv 4597	Ordered pair membership in the universal class of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- <. A , B >. e. ( _V X. _V )
Theorem	opthprc 4598	Justification theorem for an ordered pair definition that works for any classes, including proper classes. This is a possible definition implied by the footnote in [Jech] p. 78, which says, "The sophisticated reader will not object to our use of a pair of classes." (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2003.)
|- ( ( ( A X. { (/) } ) u. ( B X. { { (/) } } ) ) = ( ( C X. { (/) } ) u. ( D X. { { (/) } } ) ) <-> ( A = C /\ B = D ) )
Theorem	brel 4599	Two things in a binary relation belong to the relation's domain. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- R C_ ( C X. D )   =>    |- ( A R B -> ( A e. C /\ B e. D ) )
Theorem	brab2a 4600*	Ordered pair membership in an ordered pair class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Nov-2015.)
|- ( ( x = A /\ y = B ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- R = { <. x , y >. | ( ( x e. C /\ y e. D ) /\ ph ) }   =>    |- ( A R B <-> ( ( A e. C /\ B e. D ) /\ ps ) )