Theorem caovcanrd 6037

Description: Commute the arguments of an operation cancellation law. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
caovcang.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑥𝐹𝑧) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑧))
caovcand.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑇)
caovcand.3	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)
caovcand.4	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)
caovcanrd.5	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)
caovcanrd.6	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
caovcanrd	⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐵𝐹𝐴) = (𝐶𝐹𝐴) ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝐶,𝑦,𝑧   𝜑,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝐹,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝑆,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝑇,𝑦,𝑧

Proof of Theorem caovcanrd

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		caovcanrd.6	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥))
2		caovcanrd.5	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)
3		caovcand.3	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)
4	1, 2, 3	caovcomd 6030	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐵𝐹𝐴))
5		caovcand.4	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)
6	1, 2, 5	caovcomd 6030	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐹𝐶) = (𝐶𝐹𝐴))
7	4, 6	eqeq12d 2192	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐴𝐹𝐶) ↔ (𝐵𝐹𝐴) = (𝐶𝐹𝐴)))
8		caovcang.1	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑥𝐹𝑧) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑧))
9		caovcand.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑇)
10	8, 9, 3, 5	caovcand 6036	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐴𝐹𝐶) ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶))
11	7, 10	bitr3d 190	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐵𝐹𝐴) = (𝐶𝐹𝐴) ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105   ∧ w3a 978   = wceq 1353   ∈ wcel 2148  (class class class)co 5874

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 709  ax-5 1447  ax-7 1448  ax-gen 1449  ax-ie1 1493  ax-ie2 1494  ax-8 1504  ax-10 1505  ax-11 1506  ax-i12 1507  ax-bndl 1509  ax-4 1510  ax-17 1526  ax-i9 1530  ax-ial 1534  ax-i5r 1535  ax-ext 2159

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 980  df-tru 1356  df-nf 1461  df-sb 1763  df-clab 2164  df-cleq 2170  df-clel 2173  df-nfc 2308  df-ral 2460  df-rex 2461  df-v 2739  df-un 3133  df-sn 3598  df-pr 3599  df-op 3601  df-uni 3810  df-br 4004  df-iota 5178  df-fv 5224  df-ov 5877

This theorem is referenced by: (None)