Theorem cbvopab2v 4013

Description: Rule used to change the second bound variable in an ordered pair abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-1999.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
cbvopab2v.1	⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cbvopab2v	⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓}

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧   𝜑,𝑧   𝜓,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem cbvopab2v

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		opeq2 3714	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩)
2	1	eqeq2d 2152	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ↔ 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩))
3		cbvopab2v.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
4	2, 3	anbi12d 465	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ((𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
5	4	cbvexv 1891	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓))
6	5	exbii 1585	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓))
7	6	abbii 2256	. 2 ⊢ {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)}
8		df-opab 3998	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
9		df-opab 3998	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)}
10	7, 8, 9	3eqtr4i 2171	1 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓}

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103   ↔ wb 104   = wceq 1332  ∃wex 1469  {cab 2126  ⟨cop 3535  {copab 3996

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 699  ax-5 1424  ax-7 1425  ax-gen 1426  ax-ie1 1470  ax-ie2 1471  ax-8 1483  ax-10 1484  ax-11 1485  ax-i12 1486  ax-bndl 1487  ax-4 1488  ax-17 1507  ax-i9 1511  ax-ial 1515  ax-i5r 1516  ax-ext 2122

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 965  df-tru 1335  df-nf 1438  df-sb 1737  df-clab 2127  df-cleq 2133  df-clel 2136  df-nfc 2271  df-v 2691  df-un 3080  df-sn 3538  df-pr 3539  df-op 3541  df-opab 3998

This theorem is referenced by: (None)