Theorem cbvrab 2724

Description: Rule to change the bound variable in a restricted class abstraction, using implicit substitution. This version has bound-variable hypotheses in place of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Oct-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
cbvrab.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
cbvrab.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
cbvrab.3	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
cbvrab.4	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
cbvrab.5	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cbvrab	⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}

Proof of Theorem cbvrab

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfv 1516	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)
2		cbvrab.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
3	2	nfcri 2302	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴
4		nfs1v 1927	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑
5	3, 4	nfan 1553	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑)
6		eleq1 2229	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))
7		sbequ12 1759	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
8	6, 7	anbi12d 465	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑)))
9	1, 5, 8	cbvab 2290	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} = {𝑧 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑)}
10		cbvrab.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
11	10	nfcri 2302	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴
12		cbvrab.3	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
13	12	nfsb 1934	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦[𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑
14	11, 13	nfan 1553	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑)
15		nfv 1516	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)
16		eleq1 2229	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
17		sbequ 1828	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
18		cbvrab.4	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
19		cbvrab.5	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
20	18, 19	sbie 1779	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
21	17, 20	bitrdi 195	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
22	16, 21	anbi12d 465	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)))
23	14, 15, 22	cbvab 2290	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)}
24	9, 23	eqtri 2186	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)}
25		df-rab 2453	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}
26		df-rab 2453	. 2 ⊢ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)}
27	24, 25, 26	3eqtr4i 2196	1 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103   ↔ wb 104   = wceq 1343  Ⅎwnf 1448  [wsb 1750   ∈ wcel 2136  {cab 2151  Ⅎwnfc 2295  {crab 2448

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 699  ax-5 1435  ax-7 1436  ax-gen 1437  ax-ie1 1481  ax-ie2 1482  ax-8 1492  ax-10 1493  ax-11 1494  ax-i12 1495  ax-bndl 1497  ax-4 1498  ax-17 1514  ax-i9 1518  ax-ial 1522  ax-i5r 1523  ax-ext 2147

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-nf 1449  df-sb 1751  df-clab 2152  df-cleq 2158  df-clel 2161  df-nfc 2297  df-rab 2453

This theorem is referenced by:  cbvrabv  2725  elrabsf  2989  tfis  4560