Theorem ceqsalg 2740

Description: A representation of explicit substitution of a class for a variable, inferred from an implicit substitution hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ceqsalg.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
ceqsalg.2	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ceqsalg	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑥)   𝑉(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem ceqsalg

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elisset 2726	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴)
2		nfa1 1521	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)
3		ceqsalg.1	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
4		ceqsalg.2	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
5	4	biimpd 143	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))
6	5	a2i 11	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜓))
7	6	sps 1517	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜓))
8	2, 3, 7	exlimd 1577	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) → (∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜓))
9	1, 8	syl5com 29	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) → 𝜓))
10	4	biimprcd 159	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑))
11	3, 10	alrimi 1502	. 2 ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑))
12	9, 11	impbid1 141	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 104  ∀wal 1333   = wceq 1335  Ⅎwnf 1440  ∃wex 1472   ∈ wcel 2128

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-5 1427  ax-gen 1429  ax-ie1 1473  ax-ie2 1474  ax-8 1484  ax-4 1490  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-ext 2139

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-nf 1441  df-sb 1743  df-clab 2144  df-cleq 2150  df-clel 2153  df-v 2714

This theorem is referenced by:  ceqsal  2741  sbc6g  2961  uniiunlem  3216  sucprcreg  4506  funimass4  5516  ralrnmpo  5929