Theorem elrabf 2934

Description: Membership in a restricted class abstraction, using implicit substitution. This version has bound-variable hypotheses in place of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 21-Sep-2003.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
elrabf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
elrabf.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
elrabf.3	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
elrabf.4	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
elrabf	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓))

Proof of Theorem elrabf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elex 2788	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} → 𝐴 ∈ V)
2		elex 2788	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
3	2	adantr 276	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
4		df-rab 2495	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)}
5	4	eleq2i 2274	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)})
6		elrabf.1	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
7		elrabf.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
8	6, 7	nfel 2359	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵
9		elrabf.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
10	8, 9	nfan 1589	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)
11		eleq1 2270	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))
12		elrabf.4	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
13	11, 12	anbi12d 473	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)))
14	6, 10, 13	elabgf 2922	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)))
15	5, 14	bitrid 192	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)))
16	1, 3, 15	pm5.21nii 706	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105   = wceq 1373  Ⅎwnf 1484   ∈ wcel 2178  {cab 2193  Ⅎwnfc 2337  {crab 2490  Vcvv 2776

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 711  ax-5 1471  ax-7 1472  ax-gen 1473  ax-ie1 1517  ax-ie2 1518  ax-8 1528  ax-10 1529  ax-11 1530  ax-i12 1531  ax-bndl 1533  ax-4 1534  ax-17 1550  ax-i9 1554  ax-ial 1558  ax-i5r 1559  ax-ext 2189

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1376  df-nf 1485  df-sb 1787  df-clab 2194  df-cleq 2200  df-clel 2203  df-nfc 2339  df-rab 2495  df-v 2778

This theorem is referenced by:  elrab  2936  invdisjrab  4053  frind  4417  rabxfrd  4534  infssuzcldc  10415  nnwosdc  12475