Theorem elrabf 2957

Description: Membership in a restricted class abstraction, using implicit substitution. This version has bound-variable hypotheses in place of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 21-Sep-2003.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
elrabf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
elrabf.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
elrabf.3	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
elrabf.4	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
elrabf	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓))

Proof of Theorem elrabf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elex 2811	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} → 𝐴 ∈ V)
2		elex 2811	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
3	2	adantr 276	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
4		df-rab 2517	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)}
5	4	eleq2i 2296	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)})
6		elrabf.1	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
7		elrabf.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
8	6, 7	nfel 2381	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵
9		elrabf.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
10	8, 9	nfan 1611	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)
11		eleq1 2292	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))
12		elrabf.4	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
13	11, 12	anbi12d 473	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)))
14	6, 10, 13	elabgf 2945	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)))
15	5, 14	bitrid 192	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)))
16	1, 3, 15	pm5.21nii 709	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105   = wceq 1395  Ⅎwnf 1506   ∈ wcel 2200  {cab 2215  Ⅎwnfc 2359  {crab 2512  Vcvv 2799

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 714  ax-5 1493  ax-7 1494  ax-gen 1495  ax-ie1 1539  ax-ie2 1540  ax-8 1550  ax-10 1551  ax-11 1552  ax-i12 1553  ax-bndl 1555  ax-4 1556  ax-17 1572  ax-i9 1576  ax-ial 1580  ax-i5r 1581  ax-ext 2211

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1398  df-nf 1507  df-sb 1809  df-clab 2216  df-cleq 2222  df-clel 2225  df-nfc 2361  df-rab 2517  df-v 2801

This theorem is referenced by:  elrab  2959  invdisjrab  4076  frind  4442  rabxfrd  4559  infssuzcldc  10450  nnwosdc  12555