ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  elintrab GIF version

Theorem elintrab 3747
Description: Membership in the intersection of a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-1999.)
Hypothesis
Ref Expression
inteqab.1 𝐴 ∈ V
Assertion
Ref Expression
elintrab (𝐴 {𝑥𝐵𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥𝐵 (𝜑𝐴𝑥))
Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝐵(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem elintrab
StepHypRef Expression
1 inteqab.1 . . . 4 𝐴 ∈ V
21elintab 3746 . . 3 (𝐴 {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)} ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥𝐵𝜑) → 𝐴𝑥))
3 impexp 261 . . . 4 (((𝑥𝐵𝜑) → 𝐴𝑥) ↔ (𝑥𝐵 → (𝜑𝐴𝑥)))
43albii 1427 . . 3 (∀𝑥((𝑥𝐵𝜑) → 𝐴𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥𝐵 → (𝜑𝐴𝑥)))
52, 4bitri 183 . 2 (𝐴 {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥𝐵 → (𝜑𝐴𝑥)))
6 df-rab 2397 . . . 4 {𝑥𝐵𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)}
76inteqi 3739 . . 3 {𝑥𝐵𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)}
87eleq2i 2179 . 2 (𝐴 {𝑥𝐵𝜑} ↔ 𝐴 {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)})
9 df-ral 2393 . 2 (∀𝑥𝐵 (𝜑𝐴𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥𝐵 → (𝜑𝐴𝑥)))
105, 8, 93bitr4i 211 1 (𝐴 {𝑥𝐵𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥𝐵 (𝜑𝐴𝑥))
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wa 103  wb 104  wal 1310  wcel 1461  {cab 2099  wral 2388  {crab 2392  Vcvv 2655   cint 3735
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 681  ax-5 1404  ax-7 1405  ax-gen 1406  ax-ie1 1450  ax-ie2 1451  ax-8 1463  ax-10 1464  ax-11 1465  ax-i12 1466  ax-bndl 1467  ax-4 1468  ax-17 1487  ax-i9 1491  ax-ial 1495  ax-i5r 1496  ax-ext 2095
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1315  df-nf 1418  df-sb 1717  df-clab 2100  df-cleq 2106  df-clel 2109  df-nfc 2242  df-ral 2393  df-rab 2397  df-v 2657  df-int 3736
This theorem is referenced by:  elintrabg  3748  intmin  3755  bj-indint  12812
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator