ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  elintrab GIF version

Theorem elintrab 3677
Description: Membership in the intersection of a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-1999.)
Hypothesis
Ref Expression
inteqab.1 𝐴 ∈ V
Assertion
Ref Expression
elintrab (𝐴 {𝑥𝐵𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥𝐵 (𝜑𝐴𝑥))
Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝐵(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem elintrab
StepHypRef Expression
1 inteqab.1 . . . 4 𝐴 ∈ V
21elintab 3676 . . 3 (𝐴 {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)} ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥𝐵𝜑) → 𝐴𝑥))
3 impexp 259 . . . 4 (((𝑥𝐵𝜑) → 𝐴𝑥) ↔ (𝑥𝐵 → (𝜑𝐴𝑥)))
43albii 1402 . . 3 (∀𝑥((𝑥𝐵𝜑) → 𝐴𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥𝐵 → (𝜑𝐴𝑥)))
52, 4bitri 182 . 2 (𝐴 {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥𝐵 → (𝜑𝐴𝑥)))
6 df-rab 2364 . . . 4 {𝑥𝐵𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)}
76inteqi 3669 . . 3 {𝑥𝐵𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)}
87eleq2i 2151 . 2 (𝐴 {𝑥𝐵𝜑} ↔ 𝐴 {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)})
9 df-ral 2360 . 2 (∀𝑥𝐵 (𝜑𝐴𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥𝐵 → (𝜑𝐴𝑥)))
105, 8, 93bitr4i 210 1 (𝐴 {𝑥𝐵𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥𝐵 (𝜑𝐴𝑥))
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wa 102  wb 103  wal 1285  wcel 1436  {cab 2071  wral 2355  {crab 2359  Vcvv 2614   cint 3665
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 663  ax-5 1379  ax-7 1380  ax-gen 1381  ax-ie1 1425  ax-ie2 1426  ax-8 1438  ax-10 1439  ax-11 1440  ax-i12 1441  ax-bndl 1442  ax-4 1443  ax-17 1462  ax-i9 1466  ax-ial 1470  ax-i5r 1471  ax-ext 2067
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-tru 1290  df-nf 1393  df-sb 1690  df-clab 2072  df-cleq 2078  df-clel 2081  df-nfc 2214  df-ral 2360  df-rab 2364  df-v 2616  df-int 3666
This theorem is referenced by:  elintrabg  3678  intmin  3685  bj-indint  11183
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator