ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  elintrab GIF version

Theorem elintrab 3886
Description: Membership in the intersection of a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-1999.)
Hypothesis
Ref Expression
inteqab.1 𝐴 ∈ V
Assertion
Ref Expression
elintrab (𝐴 {𝑥𝐵𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥𝐵 (𝜑𝐴𝑥))
Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝐵(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem elintrab
StepHypRef Expression
1 inteqab.1 . . . 4 𝐴 ∈ V
21elintab 3885 . . 3 (𝐴 {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)} ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥𝐵𝜑) → 𝐴𝑥))
3 impexp 263 . . . 4 (((𝑥𝐵𝜑) → 𝐴𝑥) ↔ (𝑥𝐵 → (𝜑𝐴𝑥)))
43albii 1484 . . 3 (∀𝑥((𝑥𝐵𝜑) → 𝐴𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥𝐵 → (𝜑𝐴𝑥)))
52, 4bitri 184 . 2 (𝐴 {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥𝐵 → (𝜑𝐴𝑥)))
6 df-rab 2484 . . . 4 {𝑥𝐵𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)}
76inteqi 3878 . . 3 {𝑥𝐵𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)}
87eleq2i 2263 . 2 (𝐴 {𝑥𝐵𝜑} ↔ 𝐴 {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)})
9 df-ral 2480 . 2 (∀𝑥𝐵 (𝜑𝐴𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥𝐵 → (𝜑𝐴𝑥)))
105, 8, 93bitr4i 212 1 (𝐴 {𝑥𝐵𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥𝐵 (𝜑𝐴𝑥))
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wa 104  wb 105  wal 1362  wcel 2167  {cab 2182  wral 2475  {crab 2479  Vcvv 2763   cint 3874
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1461  ax-7 1462  ax-gen 1463  ax-ie1 1507  ax-ie2 1508  ax-8 1518  ax-10 1519  ax-11 1520  ax-i12 1521  ax-bndl 1523  ax-4 1524  ax-17 1540  ax-i9 1544  ax-ial 1548  ax-i5r 1549  ax-ext 2178
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1367  df-nf 1475  df-sb 1777  df-clab 2183  df-cleq 2189  df-clel 2192  df-nfc 2328  df-ral 2480  df-rab 2484  df-v 2765  df-int 3875
This theorem is referenced by:  elintrabg  3887  intmin  3894  bj-indint  15577
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator