ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  inrab GIF version

Theorem inrab 3352
Description: Intersection of two restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 1-Sep-2006.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
inrab ({𝑥𝐴𝜑} ∩ {𝑥𝐴𝜓}) = {𝑥𝐴 ∣ (𝜑𝜓)}

Proof of Theorem inrab
StepHypRef Expression
1 df-rab 2426 . . 3 {𝑥𝐴𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)}
2 df-rab 2426 . . 3 {𝑥𝐴𝜓} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜓)}
31, 2ineq12i 3279 . 2 ({𝑥𝐴𝜑} ∩ {𝑥𝐴𝜓}) = ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)} ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜓)})
4 df-rab 2426 . . 3 {𝑥𝐴 ∣ (𝜑𝜓)} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴 ∧ (𝜑𝜓))}
5 inab 3348 . . . 4 ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)} ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜓)}) = {𝑥 ∣ ((𝑥𝐴𝜑) ∧ (𝑥𝐴𝜓))}
6 anandi 580 . . . . 5 ((𝑥𝐴 ∧ (𝜑𝜓)) ↔ ((𝑥𝐴𝜑) ∧ (𝑥𝐴𝜓)))
76abbii 2256 . . . 4 {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴 ∧ (𝜑𝜓))} = {𝑥 ∣ ((𝑥𝐴𝜑) ∧ (𝑥𝐴𝜓))}
85, 7eqtr4i 2164 . . 3 ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)} ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜓)}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴 ∧ (𝜑𝜓))}
94, 8eqtr4i 2164 . 2 {𝑥𝐴 ∣ (𝜑𝜓)} = ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)} ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜓)})
103, 9eqtr4i 2164 1 ({𝑥𝐴𝜑} ∩ {𝑥𝐴𝜓}) = {𝑥𝐴 ∣ (𝜑𝜓)}
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  wa 103   = wceq 1332  wcel 1481  {cab 2126  {crab 2421  cin 3074
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 699  ax-5 1424  ax-7 1425  ax-gen 1426  ax-ie1 1470  ax-ie2 1471  ax-8 1483  ax-10 1484  ax-11 1485  ax-i12 1486  ax-bndl 1487  ax-4 1488  ax-17 1507  ax-i9 1511  ax-ial 1515  ax-i5r 1516  ax-ext 2122
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1335  df-nf 1438  df-sb 1737  df-clab 2127  df-cleq 2133  df-clel 2136  df-nfc 2271  df-rab 2426  df-v 2691  df-in 3081
This theorem is referenced by:  rabnc  3399  iooinsup  11077  phiprmpw  11932  unennn  11944
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator