Theorem inrab 3287

Description: Intersection of two restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 1-Sep-2006.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
inrab	⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)}

Proof of Theorem inrab

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-rab 2379	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}
2		df-rab 2379	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)}
3	1, 2	ineq12i 3214	. 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)})
4		df-rab 2379	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))}
5		inab 3283	. . . 4 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)}) = {𝑥 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓))}
6		anandi 558	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)))
7	6	abbii 2210	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))} = {𝑥 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓))}
8	5, 7	eqtr4i 2118	. . 3 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))}
9	4, 8	eqtr4i 2118	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)} = ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)})
10	3, 9	eqtr4i 2118	1 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)}

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 103   = wceq 1296   ∈ wcel 1445  {cab 2081  {crab 2374   ∩ cin 3012

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 668  ax-5 1388  ax-7 1389  ax-gen 1390  ax-ie1 1434  ax-ie2 1435  ax-8 1447  ax-10 1448  ax-11 1449  ax-i12 1450  ax-bndl 1451  ax-4 1452  ax-17 1471  ax-i9 1475  ax-ial 1479  ax-i5r 1480  ax-ext 2077

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1299  df-nf 1402  df-sb 1700  df-clab 2082  df-cleq 2088  df-clel 2091  df-nfc 2224  df-rab 2379  df-v 2635  df-in 3019

This theorem is referenced by:  rabnc  3334  iooinsup  10820  phiprmpw  11625  unennn  11637