Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next > Nearby theorems Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  inrab2 GIF version

Theorem inrab2 3273
 Description: Intersection with a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-2007.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
inrab2 ({𝑥𝐴𝜑} ∩ 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ∣ 𝜑}
Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐵
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝐴(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem inrab2
StepHypRef Expression
1 df-rab 2369 . . 3 {𝑥𝐴𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)}
2 abid2 2209 . . . 4 {𝑥𝑥𝐵} = 𝐵
32eqcomi 2093 . . 3 𝐵 = {𝑥𝑥𝐵}
41, 3ineq12i 3200 . 2 ({𝑥𝐴𝜑} ∩ 𝐵) = ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)} ∩ {𝑥𝑥𝐵})
5 df-rab 2369 . . 3 {𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)}
6 inab 3268 . . . 4 ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)} ∩ {𝑥𝑥𝐵}) = {𝑥 ∣ ((𝑥𝐴𝜑) ∧ 𝑥𝐵)}
7 elin 3184 . . . . . . 7 (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ↔ (𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐵))
87anbi1i 447 . . . . . 6 ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐵) ∧ 𝜑))
9 an32 530 . . . . . 6 (((𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑥𝐴𝜑) ∧ 𝑥𝐵))
108, 9bitri 183 . . . . 5 ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑥𝐴𝜑) ∧ 𝑥𝐵))
1110abbii 2204 . . . 4 {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)} = {𝑥 ∣ ((𝑥𝐴𝜑) ∧ 𝑥𝐵)}
126, 11eqtr4i 2112 . . 3 ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)} ∩ {𝑥𝑥𝐵}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)}
135, 12eqtr4i 2112 . 2 {𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ∣ 𝜑} = ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)} ∩ {𝑥𝑥𝐵})
144, 13eqtr4i 2112 1 ({𝑥𝐴𝜑} ∩ 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ∣ 𝜑}
 Colors of variables: wff set class Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 103   = wceq 1290   ∈ wcel 1439  {cab 2075  {crab 2364   ∩ cin 2999 This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 666  ax-5 1382  ax-7 1383  ax-gen 1384  ax-ie1 1428  ax-ie2 1429  ax-8 1441  ax-10 1442  ax-11 1443  ax-i12 1444  ax-bndl 1445  ax-4 1446  ax-17 1465  ax-i9 1469  ax-ial 1473  ax-i5r 1474  ax-ext 2071 This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1293  df-nf 1396  df-sb 1694  df-clab 2076  df-cleq 2082  df-clel 2085  df-nfc 2218  df-rab 2369  df-v 2622  df-in 3006 This theorem is referenced by:  iooval2  9394  fzval2  9488  dfphi2  11535  znnen  11550
 Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator