| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > f1otrgds | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Convenient lemma for f1otrg 29277. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Mar-2019.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| f1otrkg.p | ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) |
| f1otrkg.d | ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝐺) |
| f1otrkg.i | ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) |
| f1otrkg.b | ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐻) |
| f1otrkg.e | ⊢ 𝐸 = (dist‘𝐻) |
| f1otrkg.j | ⊢ 𝐽 = (Itv‘𝐻) |
| f1otrkg.f | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝑃) |
| f1otrkg.1 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑒𝐸𝑓) = ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑓))) |
| f1otrkg.2 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑔 ∈ (𝑒𝐽𝑓) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑔) ∈ ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐼(𝐹‘𝑓)))) |
| f1otrgitv.x | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) |
| f1otrgitv.y | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| f1otrgds | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐸𝑌) = ((𝐹‘𝑋)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑌))) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | f1otrkg.1 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑒𝐸𝑓) = ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑓))) | |
| 2 | 1 | ralrimivva 3210 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑒𝐸𝑓) = ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑓))) |
| 3 | f1otrgitv.x | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) | |
| 4 | f1otrgitv.y | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) | |
| 5 | oveq1 7426 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑒 = 𝑋 → (𝑒𝐸𝑓) = (𝑋𝐸𝑓)) | |
| 6 | fveq2 6885 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑒 = 𝑋 → (𝐹‘𝑒) = (𝐹‘𝑋)) | |
| 7 | 6 | oveq1d 7434 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑒 = 𝑋 → ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑓)) = ((𝐹‘𝑋)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑓))) |
| 8 | 5, 7 | eqeq12d 2781 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑒 = 𝑋 → ((𝑒𝐸𝑓) = ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑓)) ↔ (𝑋𝐸𝑓) = ((𝐹‘𝑋)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑓)))) |
| 9 | oveq2 7427 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑌 → (𝑋𝐸𝑓) = (𝑋𝐸𝑌)) | |
| 10 | fveq2 6885 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑌 → (𝐹‘𝑓) = (𝐹‘𝑌)) | |
| 11 | 10 | oveq2d 7435 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑌 → ((𝐹‘𝑋)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑓)) = ((𝐹‘𝑋)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑌))) |
| 12 | 9, 11 | eqeq12d 2781 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑌 → ((𝑋𝐸𝑓) = ((𝐹‘𝑋)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑓)) ↔ (𝑋𝐸𝑌) = ((𝐹‘𝑋)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑌)))) |
| 13 | 8, 12 | rspc2v 3594 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (∀𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑒𝐸𝑓) = ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑓)) → (𝑋𝐸𝑌) = ((𝐹‘𝑋)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑌)))) |
| 14 | 3, 4, 13 | syl2anc 596 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑒𝐸𝑓) = ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑓)) → (𝑋𝐸𝑌) = ((𝐹‘𝑋)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑌)))) |
| 15 | 2, 14 | mpd 16 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐸𝑌) = ((𝐹‘𝑋)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑌))) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| This proof depends on syntax axioms: → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 401 ∧ w3a 1103 = wceq 1570 ∈ wcel 2146 ∀wral 3081 –1-1-onto→wf1o 6539 ‘cfv 6540 (class class class)co 7419 Basecbs 17293 distcds 17343 Itvcitv 28755 |
| This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1828 ax-4 1842 ax-5 1943 ax-6 2000 ax-7 2041 ax-8 2148 ax-9 2156 ax-ext 2737 |
| This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-or 862 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1573 df-fal 1583 df-ex 1813 df-sb 2100 df-clab 2744 df-cleq 2757 df-clel 2840 df-ral 3082 df-rab 3419 df-v 3459 df-dif 3909 df-un 3911 df-ss 3923 df-nul 4287 df-if 4490 df-sn 4592 df-pr 4594 df-op 4598 df-uni 4875 df-br 5112 df-iota 6496 df-fv 6548 df-ov 7422 |
| This theorem is used by: f1otrg 29277 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |