Users' Mathboxes Mathbox for Peter Mazsa < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >   Mathboxes  >  inxpss2 Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem inxpss2 38250
Description: Two ways to say that intersections with Cartesian products are in a subclass relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 8-Mar-2019.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
inxpss2 ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ (𝑆 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ ∀𝑥𝐴𝑦𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑥𝑆𝑦))
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦   𝑥,𝑆,𝑦

Proof of Theorem inxpss2
StepHypRef Expression
1 relinxp 5804 . . 3 Rel (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))
2 ssrel3 5776 . . 3 (Rel (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) → ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ (𝑆 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ ∀𝑥𝑦(𝑥(𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝑦𝑥(𝑆 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝑦)))
31, 2ax-mp 5 . 2 ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ (𝑆 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ ∀𝑥𝑦(𝑥(𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝑦𝑥(𝑆 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝑦))
4 inxpss3 38249 . 2 (∀𝑥𝑦(𝑥(𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝑦𝑥(𝑆 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥𝐴𝑦𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑥𝑆𝑦))
53, 4bitri 275 1 ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ (𝑆 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ ∀𝑥𝐴𝑦𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑥𝑆𝑦))
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wb 206  wal 1537  wral 3050  cin 3930  wss 3931   class class class wbr 5123   × cxp 5663  Rel wrel 5670
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1794  ax-4 1808  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1966  ax-7 2006  ax-8 2109  ax-9 2117  ax-ext 2706  ax-sep 5276  ax-nul 5286  ax-pr 5412
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1779  df-sb 2064  df-clab 2713  df-cleq 2726  df-clel 2808  df-ral 3051  df-rex 3060  df-rab 3420  df-v 3465  df-dif 3934  df-un 3936  df-in 3938  df-ss 3948  df-nul 4314  df-if 4506  df-sn 4607  df-pr 4609  df-op 4613  df-br 5124  df-opab 5186  df-xp 5671  df-rel 5672
This theorem is referenced by:  inxpssidinxp  38251  idinxpssinxp  38252
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator