Users' Mathboxes Mathbox for Peter Mazsa < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >   Mathboxes  >  inxpss2 Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem inxpss2 38300
Description: Two ways to say that intersections with Cartesian products are in a subclass relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 8-Mar-2019.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
inxpss2 ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ (𝑆 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ ∀𝑥𝐴𝑦𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑥𝑆𝑦))
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦   𝑥,𝑆,𝑦

Proof of Theorem inxpss2
StepHypRef Expression
1 relinxp 5785 . . 3 Rel (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))
2 ssrel3 5757 . . 3 (Rel (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) → ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ (𝑆 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ ∀𝑥𝑦(𝑥(𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝑦𝑥(𝑆 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝑦)))
31, 2ax-mp 5 . 2 ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ (𝑆 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ ∀𝑥𝑦(𝑥(𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝑦𝑥(𝑆 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝑦))
4 inxpss3 38299 . 2 (∀𝑥𝑦(𝑥(𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝑦𝑥(𝑆 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥𝐴𝑦𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑥𝑆𝑦))
53, 4bitri 275 1 ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ (𝑆 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ ∀𝑥𝐴𝑦𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑥𝑆𝑦))
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wb 206  wal 1538  wral 3046  cin 3921  wss 3922   class class class wbr 5115   × cxp 5644  Rel wrel 5651
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-ext 2702  ax-sep 5259  ax-nul 5269  ax-pr 5395
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-sb 2066  df-clab 2709  df-cleq 2722  df-clel 2804  df-ral 3047  df-rex 3056  df-rab 3412  df-v 3457  df-dif 3925  df-un 3927  df-in 3929  df-ss 3939  df-nul 4305  df-if 4497  df-sn 4598  df-pr 4600  df-op 4604  df-br 5116  df-opab 5178  df-xp 5652  df-rel 5653
This theorem is referenced by:  inxpssidinxp  38301  idinxpssinxp  38302
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator