Theorem inxpssidinxp 36378

Description: Two ways to say that intersections with Cartesian products are in a subclass relation, special case of inxpss2 36377. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 4-Jul-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
inxpssidinxp	⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦

Proof of Theorem inxpssidinxp

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		inxpss2 36377	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥 I 𝑦))
2		ideqg 5749	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ V → (𝑥 I 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
3	2	elv 3428	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 I 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦)
4	3	imbi2i 335	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥 I 𝑦) ↔ (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦))
5	4	2ralbii 3091	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥 I 𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦))
6	1, 5	bitri 274	1 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205  ∀wral 3063  Vcvv 3422   ∩ cin 3882   ⊆ wss 3883   class class class wbr 5070   I cid 5479   × cxp 5578

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5218  ax-nul 5225  ax-pr 5347

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 844  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1784  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2817  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3069  df-rab 3072  df-v 3424  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-nul 4254  df-if 4457  df-sn 4559  df-pr 4561  df-op 4565  df-br 5071  df-opab 5133  df-id 5480  df-xp 5586  df-rel 5587

This theorem is referenced by:  dfcnvrefrels3  36572  dfcnvrefrel3  36574